Were human evolution and history tampered with?
Yes, world history for the last 600 years.
Yes, human evolution for the last 150 years.
Yes, the manipulation of human evolution accelerated in 2017
History was, is, and will be tampered with if science doesn’t stop it. To boast, to lie, to pretend is a part of the human homo-sapiens nature. On one hand, the winners justified their claims to titles and lands through alleged ancestry and glorious deeds. On the other hand, the court historians knew only too well how to please their masters.
Did events and eras such as the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the Roman Empire, the Dark Ages, and the Renaissance, Ancient Egypt, Greece, Persia, India, and China, Buddha, Shiva, Alexander, Confucius, and Ghengis Khan occur within a very different chronology from what we’ve been told?
US research on Earth-Moon mechanics by late NASA astrophysicist Robert Newton leads MSU mathematicians Dr. Fomenko et al. to develop a new chronology. As a result, the timeline of Civilization, based on Occam’s razor and irrefutably dated events and artifacts, shrinks drastically to 1000 years.
The civilization of the Homo sapiens population is defined as a hierarchical system consisting of a state, army, ideology, religion, exchange, writing, and communication that is both drastically shorter and dramatically different than generally presumed and drilled.
The age of the planet Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years. Our homo sapiens species appeared on our planet barely 120,000 years ago and nearly got wiped out during the Ice Age that lasted 110,000 years ago. Once the Ice Age ended, we started to multiply rapidly in the regions with fluvial agriculture.
The so-called universal classic world history is a pack of intricate lies about most events before the 16th century. As we learn it today, world history was entirely fabricated in the 16th-18th centuries on the ‘firm’ foundation laid down by Italian ‘scholars’, idem white- and black-robed clergy, idem ‘humanists’ in the 14th-16th centuries.
Petrarca and Dante, Bracciolini and Machiavelli, Giotto, Bernini, Da Vinci, and Michelangelo Corporations not only created immortal masterpieces exceedingly well paid by Roman Popes et al and Medici Princes of Florence, but also mass-produced ‘ancient’ manuscripts, frescoes, statues very much in demand by the wealthy customers from England, France, Germany, and Russia.
Medici family, along with other families of Italy – such as the Visconti and Sforza in Milan, the Este in Ferrara, and the Gonzaga in Mantua – created an environment in which art and humanism could flourish, inspired, and fostered the birth of the “Renaissance” in the XV-XVIII centuries.
Better yet, they made both money and power in Europe. The Medici Bank was one of Europe’s most prosperous and respected institutions. By some estimates, the Medici family was Europe’s wealthiest. They used this base to gain political power, first in Florence and later across Italy and Europe.
Oxbridge scholars earned their daily bread & butter by cooking very Ancient Greece & Roman Empire history mostly from Italian ingredients. The Glorious Revolution in England had already taken place, and the British Empire was in the works and badly needed glorious predecessors like the Roman Empire.
The French learned crowd made their encyclopedic cuisine of the alleged ideal Roman Republic history, followed by Caesar, Augustus, and 12 Emperors, preparing French minds for the Ideal Republic and the French Caesar who turned it into an Empire.
The French Kings, out of pure spite of all things English (!), ran a ‘successful’ live test of the Ideal Republic in 1776 in the British American colonies by helping American freedom fighters free their lands from paying taxes to the British crown and found the United States of America.
The British Empire paid back by helping French freedom fighters make the dream of French scholars come true: founding the French Republic in 1789, etc.…. Somehow, the very liberal King Louis XVI lost control, his head, and his crown.
Corsican Napoleon Bouenaparté, a student of the artillery Academy of King Louis XVI, found the regal crown the libertarian King lost in the gutter of the Revolution and rapidly became Lieutenant, Captain, General Consul, and Emperor (!) Napoleon I of the French Republic (!) was blessed by the Roman Pope on a short leash.
Of course, neither generations after generations of historians nor Hollywood scriptwriters can’t be totally in the wrong. After what was learned in school and university, no one will easily believe that the classical history of ancient Rome, Greece, Asia, Egypt, China, Japan, India, etc., is manifestly false.
History: Fiction or Science? New Chronology Vol.IV. Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome.
Mainstream historians and history buffs will indignantly point the accusing finger at the gigantic pyramids in Egypt, the Coliseum in Rome, the Great Wall of China, and ancient Chinese inventions. They claim, aren’t they ancient, thousands of years ancient?
True that Renaissance artists, sculptors, architects, and engineers have not built Pyramids in Egypt or gigantic palaces in Persia, or the Great Wall in China, but a closer look at ‘evidence’ of the age of what is left of the 7 Wonders of Antiquity raises a suspicion that they were built only 5-8 hundred years ago.
The issue is that no valid, irrefutable scientific proof shows that ALL ‘ancient’ artifacts are older than 1000 years, contrary to the self-fulfilling radiocarbon dating obligingly rubber-stamped by radiocarbon labs to the prescriptions of mainstream historians.
How heartbreaking is it that the oldest ORIGINAL written documents that can be irrefutably and unambiguously dated belong only to the 11th century!
All dirty, worn-out originals of “ancient” manuscripts have somewhat conveniently disappeared in the Very Dark Ages, as illiterate but tidy monks kept only brand-new copies.
Better yet, most of the very old original documents and chronicles of the 11th-13th century tell very peculiar stories completely out of line with the consensual history.
New Chronology firmly asserts that Homo sapiens invented writing (Chinese hieroglyphics and cuneiform including) only about 1000 years ago. Writing skills were immediately and irreversibly put to the use of ruling powers and science.
Gentlemen, kindly don’t shout and wave about the fragile and dusty Dead Sea scrolls as irrefutable proof of pre-diluvian ancient primary sources. They contain valuable information to extract and analyze despite their medieval make.
For heaven’s sake, don’t quote the endless pearls of wisdom of Confucius allegedly from 551 B.C. These pearls are no more than the top-line quality product of the teamwork of learned Jesuit infiltrators to China and Lettered Chinese (who played along) of the 16th-18th century.
The case of ‘Ancient’ China is even funnier, as there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that can be independently and irrefutably dated as being older than the 15th century!
Evidence suggests that the system of Chinese hieroglyphs was invented and introduced by Jesuits, aka the Italian Jesuit missionary, mathematician, astronomer, cartographer, and translator Matteo Ricci.
Ricci was the first European to visit the Forbidden City and gained the confidence of the imperial family. He introduced the backward Chinese to advanced Western science and culture for the first time. The Chinese first learned Western cartography, mathematics, and astronomy thanks to Matteo Ricci.
The clean-up of all things written ordered by the Manchu dynasty, which took (with a sword, etc…) over from the Ming dynasty in 1644 A.D., was very thorough. All majestic Chinese inventions like powder, silk, and paper are actually of European and Middle Eastern origin.
Don’t throw the Sinai Codex Book from the British Museum at us, either. British Museum coughed up £100 000 ( £5 000 000 in today’s pounds) to buy from smart, illiterate Russian atheist Bolsheviks in 1932.
It’s too bad this precious Codex is also early medieval at best. German Indiana Tischendorff dug it personally from the wastebasket of St Catherine’s monastery in Sinai (fact!), invented a ‘science’ of paleography (fact!), proved with his ‘science’ the biblical age of the Codex (presumption?).
Learned Dr. Tischendorff presented this stamped by his own ‘science’ treasure to the Czar-Emperor Alexander II of the Russian Empire, reaped the Czar’s ransom of 50,000 gold roubles ($ 10 000 000 today), and was ennobled as Russian Count (sic!).
We learn about ancient history in school. Children love the magical lessons of history – they are sweet fairy tales. Teachers recite breathtaking stories; very soon, we know by heart the names and deeds of brave warriors, wise philosophers, fabulous Pharaohs, cunning high priests, and greedy scribes.
We find out about the gigantic Pyramids and sinister castles, kings and queens, dukes and barons, brave, powerful knights and beautiful ladies, emaciated saints, and low-life traitors.
We are caught up in tales of cruel wars, merciless Roman legions conquering everything in sight, noble knights, crusades, and contests. We are thrilled by perilous sea voyages, discoveries, passions, and adventures. Wow, we love it! As we grow up, our love of history grows even stronger, turning us into history buffs.
We watch megalomaniac, breathtaking Hollywood productions in 2D and 3D, read historical fiction, buy glossy and expensive books about mysteries of history, admire archaeological finds and digs, go to museums, travel to Egypt, Rome, Greece, India, and China to see it all with our own eyes.
History: Fiction or Science? New Chronology Vol.IV. Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome.
Oh yes, we finally understand the true meaning of universal world history. Ah, we see the rise and, ouch, the fall of civilizations. Human civilization began so very, very long ago. It was antediluvian, maybe? Aliens helped us along?
There is just too much fantasy to be found in history. The ‘ancient history’ of Antiquity and the Middle Ages is an enormous edifice of unspeakable perfection and beauty manufactured in the Renaissance but literally left hanging in the air.
This construct has no proven and reliably dated documentary foundation. The consensual version of World history generally accepted today is based on Kabbalist and Jesuit presumptions.
You might indignantly object that there are innumerable historical documents, manuscripts, ancient papyri, parchments, and old and not-so-old books buzzing with references to, from, and about the past. There appears to be more than enough historical material to reconstruct the glorious past completely and easily!
Oh yes, there are ‘documents’ and ‘stories’ in abundance to generate multitudes of dazzling Hollywood blockbusters, such as “Gladiator,” “Troy,” and “Alexander,” with the convincing acting of Russell Crowe or Brad Pitt.
There are enough sizzling ideas for further barn-burners like “Da Vinci Code”, but it is wrong to presume that the reconstruction of the past is simple. Lucas & Co. takes an ancient chronicle and translates it into contemporary language, and that’s it. History is reconstructed to the last detail, right?
Alas, and lack that is not so!
Ancient history is, first of all, a written, subjective history based on the following sources used in a perfect circular manner: documents, manuscripts, printed books, paintings, monuments, and artifacts.
When the textbooks tell us that Genghis Khan in year X A.D. or Alexander the Great in year Y B.C. has each conquered half of the world, it means only that it is so told in some copies of the written sources; alas, their originals have somehow disappeared long ago.
Seemingly simple questions practically never have clear, unambiguous answers. When were these sources written? Where and by whom were they found? The answers to these questions are very complex, require in-depth research, and refute the assumptions.
It is further wrongly presumed that numerous carefully preserved ancient and medieval chronicles are readily available, written by Genghis Khan’s or Alexander the Great’s contemporaries and eyewitnesses to their fantastic conquests.
Naturally, such precious primary sources are kept in the National Libraries of Mongolia, Greece, France, Germany, Italy, etc., in the Library of Congress or in the private collection of Microsoft, right?
Zilch comma zilch sources come from contemporaries and eyewitnesses: Mongols were a nomadic and illiterate bunch; sweet Alexander lived so long ago that most 100% reliable sources know for sure he was the son of Zeus, right?
Nobody has seen Alexander’s birth certificate, not even a copy, and Zeus doesn’t answer the phone to confirm his fatherhood. Sorry, only fairly recent sources are available, written hundreds or even thousands of years after the alleged events.
In most cases, ‘sources’ have been written only in the XVI-XVIII centuries or even later. As a rule, these ‘sources’ suffered, after they were discovered, considerable multiple manipulations, falsifications, and distortions by editing to this or other order of this or another power in command of the day.
At the same time, innumerable originals of ancient documents were DESTROYED in Europe under the pretext of heresy. The Roman Curia established a list of forbidden authors; contemporary and ancient heretical manuscripts were burned all over Europe.
Council of Trent of 1545-1563 transformed the pro-imperial Orthodox Catholic Church into the Roman Catholic Church. It started a bitter confrontation with Protestants who dared to translate the Bible into vernacular English and German.
The brand new Roman Church changed in 1582 Julian to the Gregorian calendar in Europe. Multi-volume collections of ancient Greek and Roman authors appear even before original masterpieces of the “ancients” are ever found.
History: Fiction or Science? New Chronology Vol.IV. Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome.
Of course, some real events were the source of most written documents, even those later falsified and manipulated. However, the same real events could have been described in Chronicles by authors writing in different languages and having contradictory points of view.
In many cases, such descriptions are plainly unrecognizable as the same event. The names of persons and geographical sites often changed meaning and location during the centuries.
The same name could have an entirely different meaning in different historical epochs. Geographical locations were clearly defined on maps with definite coordinates only with the advent of printing.
Printing made it possible to circulate identical copies of the same map for military, navigation, education, governance, etc.
Before the invention of printed maps, each original map was a unique work of art, both beautiful, non-exact, and contradictory.
Mainstream from Oxford says: «Stop… everybody knows that Julius Caesar lived in the first century B.C. Do you really doubt it?» Yes, we really do. For us, this statement is only a dominant point of view today. But it is only one of many possible points of view until the very fact of his life and deeds is proven.
In turn, we will also ask some simple questions: where did you get your information? From a textbook? That’s not good enough. When and who was the first to say that Julius Caesar lived in the first century B.C.?
What book, document, and/or manuscript can you quote as a primary source? Who is the author of this source? When and by whom was this primary source written down, and where was it discovered, please?
We do not accept the «the textbook says so» type of answer as proof. As soon as you dig for proof slightly deeper than the school textbook, the adamant grounds for the totally and utterly dominant point of view suddenly evaporate.
The world community of professional historians cannot produce irrefutable documentary proof that Julius Caesar existed, whether on paper, papyrus, parchment, or stone. Idem for all great names of Antiquity.
Cambridge Mainstream says: “here is the ancient chronicle that was written in the twelfth century A.D., which says, ‘Julius Caesar lived in the first century B.C.’.”
But what proves that this Chronicle was written in the twelfth century and not in the sixteenth century, which happens to be the age-oldest copy of the Chronicle they quote? Is your written source scientifically dated?
You know, the bronze (plastic or cardboard) panel made in the twenty-first century with the lettering: “Temple of Jupiter built I century B.C. by the personal command of the Great Magnificent Caesar the Emperor of Rome” is hanging on the ancient-looking edifice is not irrefutable proof of when, why, or what it was built for, even if the building is located in Rome, Italy, European Community.
Indeed, the chronicle’s dating to the twelfth century must be proven. That is where the buck stops. Actually, nobody is capable of proving the date of the writing of their «old» written sources irrefutably or producing independent datings of any of the ancient artifacts.
Better yet, most of the rare sources that survived to our day and can be reliably dated to the XI-XIV centuries do not show the polished textbook picture of classical history. They show a picture utterly different from consensual.
Therefore, such witnesses and sources are not admissible to the orderly court of history. Period. Learned mainstream historians know better. They say such sources are primitive and full of errors: wrong names and locations, chronologically impossible situations, etc…
Historians claim that these sources are unfortunate concoctions of half-illiterate monks, completely illiterate hermits, and misguided travelers; therefore, they cannot be accepted into the sacred temple of universal classical history.
Dating of primary sources
All existing methods of dating old and ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact, circular, subjective, and contradictory. This is, unfortunately, the case for archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical, and carbon dating. Judge for yourself.
Archaeological dating:
In an Egyptian dig of a pharaoh burial site attributed to the 16th- 19th dynasty (1500 years B.C. – this is allegedly known for a fact!) – an archaeologist finds a pot from allegedly Ancient Greece; let’s call it Article A, attributed to the Mycenaean culture.
It is inferred that they are the same age (1500 years B.C.). Logical. In another dig in Greece, definitely attributed to the Mycenaean culture, another archaeologist finds a “peculiar” button, let us call it Article B, next to a similar pot; and it is inferred that they are from the same age (1500 B.C ) as: (Age of Article A = age of Article B). OK, so far.
In further digs in Germany, archaeologists find other objects next to similar “peculiar” buttons, so it is also inferred that all these objects: Articles C, D,…N, found in the German dig, have the same age: (1500 years B.C). Logical? Seems so.
But the next day, the archaeologists in Sweden find exactly the same “peculiar” buttons in a dig of the fairly recent Dolmen burial of King Bjorn (born 953 A.D), presumably irrefutably dated to the 10th century AD.
Therefore, the “peculiar” button “proves” that King Bjorn lived 2500 years ago, and the burial Dolmen irrefutably proves that he was buried 1500 years later? Not so logical anymore.
Archaeologists call such a case a “mystery” – and .. sweep it under the carpet. Forget about logic! Archaeological dating, therefore, is, by definition, completely and inevitably SUBJECTIVE.
History: Fiction or Science? New Chronology Vol.IV. Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome.
Radiocarbon method:
Very sorry about the C14 radiocarbon dating methods; the poor Nobel Libby must be turning in his grave after arbitrary ‘calibration’ of his method (pity that!).
By ‘calibration’ on a statistically non-significant number of wood samples from Egypt with the arbitrarily suggested alleged age of 3100 B.C., the Arizona University radiocarbon team simply smuggled the consensual chronology into the C14 method of dating, turning it into a sheer fallacy. This ‘calibration’ curve allows arbitrary dating of samples by the radiocarbon laboratory.
Dr. Libby honestly earned his Nobel by developing a valid dating method (albeit a very pollution-sensitive one). On top of it, this method became very imprecise after the unknown tonnages of radiocarbon C14 isotope were dumped into the atmosphere in the course of US-USSR-France-UK 500 nuclear tests in the friendly nuclear race of the fifties.
The C14 radiocarbon dating procedure runs as follows: an archaeologist sends an artifact to a radiocarbon dating laboratory with his idea of the object’s age to get a ‘scientific’ rubber stamp. The laboratory gladly complies and makes the required radiocarbon dating, confirming the date suggested by the archaeologist.
Everybody’s happy: the lab makes good money by making an expensive test, and the archaeologist reaps the laurels for his earth-shattering discovery.
This method’s built-in low precision (because of high sensitivity) allows cooking up scientifically plausible results the customer-archaeologist wants. The general public doesn’t realize that it was duped again.
Just submit a sample of organic matter to any C14 lab and ask them to date it. The lab will ask for your idea of the sample’s age, then fiddle with lots of knobs (‘fine-tuning’) and give you the result you’ve ‘expected.’
Because C14 dating is allegedly so mind-bogglingly precise, C14 labs refuse to run a ‘black box’ test of any kind.
Nah, they assert that because their method is SO very sensitive, they must have maximum information about the sample.
This much-touted method often produces reliable dating of objects of organic origin with exactitude (mistakes that) of 50 up to plus-minus 1500 years; therefore, it is too crude for dating historical events in the 3000-year timeframe!
Dendrochronological method:
This method is unusable for reliably and irrefutably dating events in Europe older than 800 years. Samples from North America are reliably datable up to 5000 years but are irrelevant for dating ancient events in Europe, Africa, or Asia.
All dating methods used today are not independent of the classical Scaliger-Petavius chronology. Moreover, all these “fine” methods were developed and calibrated based on classical chronology. A vicious circle!
The dendrochronology in Europe and Minor Asia was ‘ordered’ to expand its scale over 12,500 years. This is another fallacy, as the number of ancient samples presented is statistically insignificant.
Why is this so?
The ‘sources’ are part of the classical chronology. Most Greek, Roman, and medieval chronicles, annals, and memoirs were massively produced in the XVI-XVIII centuries.
In fact, for the last 400 years, the whole class of historians has created, researched, perfected, and polished a world of phantom universal history and classical civilization, artfully constructed by their predecessors during the XVI-XVIII centuries at the command of the powers of that time.
Therefore, the ancient history taught in school is not the truth in the final instance; it is only the currently dominant and indoctrinated version of history. Until the contrary is proved, it is only one possible version, with an inbuilt bug of popery chronology.
The consensual version of chronology is based on a «chronological hypothesis» first formulated by the chronologists and historians Joseph Scaliger (1540-1609, leading Kabbalist of his time) and Dionysus Petavius (1583-1652, high-ranking Jesuit of his time).
Their chronology is about as irrefutable as Scaliger’s solution to the circle problem’s quadrature with π=3.16, of which Kabbalist Joseph Scaliger was anecdotal but the ferocious protagonist. Contemporary mathematicians giggled.
Genuflect and admire the Almagest, which lies as the solid foundation of the entire edifice of contemporary chronology! Almagest is supposed to have been written in the II century AD by Ptolemy, the founding grandfather of astronomy.
The fact is that Almagest, according to Robert R. Newton and Dr. A.T. Fomenko et al., was written in the XVI-XVII cy by astronomers Tycho Brahe and Kepler based on astronomical data of the X-XVI cy:
The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy Hardcover – September 1, 1977, by Professor Robert R. Newton
This presumably antediluvian tractate catalogs 1028 observable stars with a fairly high precision of 10′-15′ (arc minutes) of longitude. Now, Earth’s rotation makes the night sky turn by 1 arc degree every four minutes. One arc degree consists of 60 arc minutes, which means that the sky rotation speed equals 15′ (arc minutes) per one minute of time.
Ptolemy’s very precise measurements were simply too precise to have been made with the time-measurement instruments available in the alleged II century A.D. Ptolemy of the II century A.D. had at his disposal a sundial, a clepsydra (water jug with a hole), or a sand hourglass.
None of these contraptions has minute-level precision. Could he have used his Grandfather’s Swiss chronometer that had a minute hand? This seems improbable considering that minute hands are a novelty introduced to clocks only as recently as 1550 AD.
Another solid pillar of universal history is the Bronze Age, which supposedly occurred 3-5 thousand years ago. The numerous armies of alleged Antiquity, i.e., Egypt, Persia, Greece, and Rome, were all armed with hundreds of thousands of bronze swords, knives, etc.
Scores of thousands of tons of bronze had to be manufactured yearly for each valiant army that, according to ‘sources’, counted hundreds of thousands of brave warriors. To make bronze, you need 90% copper and 10% tin, meaning that you need thousands of tons of copper and tin per year.
Even more if you count the tonnages needed for household utensils for the wives of the warriors. Right? Yes, but the technology for crude industrial tin extraction dates back as late as the 14th century A.D.
The learned chronologists like Kabbalist Scaliger & Co did not bother to consult a chemist or alchemist. They have been driven by altogether different considerations, neither caring much for tin nor indeed for science itself!
As a result, ‘ancient’ Greek heroes (like Brad Pitt in «Troy») happily hack at each other with bronze swords that need tin for their manufacture but have not yet been discovered!
Do explore, Google, and Wikipedia the points (non-exhaustive) we made, and, step by step, you will find on your own sufficient proof to reach the inevitable conclusion that the classical Scaliger-Petavius chronology built on Kabbalistic numbers is false and, therefore, that the history of the ancient and medieval world built on this chronology and universally accepted today is also false.
After reading these books, you will certainly have a fresh and very suspicious outlook on everything said or printed about “ancient” and “enigmatic” Roman, Greek, Egyptian, Persian, and Chinese medieval, as well as all other “lost and found” civilizations.
Henry Ford once said: “History is more or less bunk! “.
Mathematician Dr. Anatoly Fomenko proved it.
P.S. Back in the USSR in 1973, a young, talented mathematician, Dr. Fomenko, worked on the Russian Lunar landing program, developing high-precision mathematical models of the Earth-Moon system.
He first got the impulse to look more closely into ancient history from the book Crime of Claudius Ptolemy by American astrophysicist Robert Newton (sic!).
For his brilliant research in applied mathematics, Dr. Fomenko was nominated as a Full Member of the Academy of the USSR, quite a sensation then, as he was only 30 years old and the youngest Full Member ever elected to the Academy.
Just a dozen years later, he was badly mauled by the Soviet and communist mainstream historians for ANTI-SOVIET and ANTIRUSSIAN activity for his application of mathematics to classical world history.
Today, the same indignant crowd of Russian (formerly Soviet & staunch communist) turncoat mainstream historians attacks him on his alleged Russian nationalism. DIRT CHEAP.
True, Dr. Fomenko is Russian and of Ukrainian origin. Also true that his theory finds short-lived instant sympathy with the Russian nationalistic crowd, but this sympathy immediately evaporates and turns into hate as soon as the same Russian nationalists discover, to their dismay, that in Dr. Fomenko’s books ancient Russians are not blue-eyed blonde Slavic-Nordic Arians, but Turks, Tartars, Arabs, and some Slavs.
Moreover, Dr. Fomenko dares to assert that the glorious 1100 years of noble Russia is a pack of lies invented by German historians and imported by Czar Peter the Great.
Actually, there wasn’t a single scientifically valid refutation of his theory. The lobby of Russian mainstream historians has hired a couple of Russian scientists from astronomy and physics, who cooked up ‘ scientific’ refutations allowing historians to slap a ‘pseudo-science’ sticker on Dr. Fomenko’s theories.
Mainstream historians don’t say that our good Doctor Fomenko didn’t take long to refute those ‘refutations’ in a very academic fashion.
See Contents of Part 1, vol.III
P.P.S.
We have here a true paradigm shift going through its works:
- complacency and/or marginalization,
- ridicule,
- criticism,
- acceptance.
It looks like it will take quite a while before reaching step 4.
P.P.P.S.
Anecdotal evidence of the ‘ancient’ history made up today:
Following the disintegration of the USSR Evil Empire, the mainstream of ex-Soviet turncoat historians has split into Russian, Ukrainian, Latvian, Estonian, Letlandian, and Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tadjikistan, Kyrizstan’s main-mid-min-streams, each one completely contradicting the others’ “ancient” history.
True Egyptian vs Fake Babylonian Eclipses
The vocabulary of astronomical symbols found in numerous Zodiacs from Egyptian Temples allows for their deciphering. They contain abundant astrological (i.e., astronomical) information sufficient for irrefutable, non-circular dating. See Contents of Part 2, vol.III
The horoscopes found in Sumerian/Babylonian tablets do not contain sufficient astronomical data; consequently, they have solutions every 30–50 years on the time axis and are, therefore, useless for dating purposes.
The vocabulary of Babylonian astronomical symbols once applied to clay tablets doesn’t allow the extraction of unique eclipse dates. The astronomical data contained therein is not sufficient for unique dating.
Either there are not enough symbols to allow astronomical interpretation to change from one clay tablet to another, or the clay tablets contain data about eclipses visible in Babylon that could have taken place every 30-40 years; therefore, they do not allow their exact pinpointing on the time axis.
An eclipse can easily be found for each allegedly ancient event mentioned in a clay cylinder or tablet of unknown age. Consequently, the dates of eclipses are attached in a circular manner.
Dr. Stephenson argues that ancient dates of Babylonian eclipses coincide with dates of Babylonian eclipses described in Ptolemy’s Almagest, which was a late medieval phantom cover for Tycho Brahe and Kepler vs. the Inquisition, but forgets to mention that the Almagest, composed in the XVI cy describes events of the X-XVI centuries. Circulus Vicious.
The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy Hardcover – September 1, 1977 by Professor Robert R. Newton
Why tamper with history?
By the middle of the XVIth century, the prime political agenda of Europe, which already had reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Empire of Eurasia.
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised, expanded Edition. See Table of Contents
The concerted effort of European aristocracy and black and white Catholic clergy, despite the severe fight with Protestants, humanists, and scientists in the XV-XVII centuries, created and disseminated ideas of the fictional Ancient World and Dark Ages that served this agenda perfectly.
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2 See Table of Contents
The fictional Ancient World that was created by black-and-white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists, and scientists served their particular agendas too by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before, according to the ancient authorities they invented and the sources they wrote under aliases.
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3. See Table of contents
The European aristocracy, partly fugitives from Byzantium and partly inheritors of former Eurasian warlords, thus justified their claims to self-rule over their lands. The Roman Curia declared its priority over the orthodoxy of the Evil Empire; Protestants, humanists, and scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4. See Table of contents
The Breakthrough New Chronology books published in the USA open new perspectives to check the veracity of history by applying mathematics, statistics, and astronomy in the same manner as they were applied to genetics.
Indeed, the time has come to check chronology scientifically, as it is the true foundation of history. Moreover, world history must not serve Judeo-Christian, Eurocentric, or any other agenda. It must become rocket science reporting the past of our home sapience species irrefutably.
Critics
History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023
History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: Chronology vol.7; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022 (Chronology Volume 7)
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6) Table of Contents V6
History: Fiction or Science? A new interpretation of Chinese and Western European history (New Chronology volume 5) Table of Contents V5 LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2
LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.
Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko
(List is non-exhaustive)
- Differential Geometry and Topology
- Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
- Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
- Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
- Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
- Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
- Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
- The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
- Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
- Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
- Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
- Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
- USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
- Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
- The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
- USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
- Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
- USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
- Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
- Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
- Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
- Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
- Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
- Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
- The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
- Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
- Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
- Taylor and Francis, 2003.
- Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
- Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
- Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
- Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
- Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
- New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
- Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
- Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.
More blogs:
- Jesus failed miracle
- Jesus, at the Nazareth school
- Jesus secret operation
- Jesus Fake Wine Plot
- Russians Convert Pope
- Christmas USA bailout
- Hell freezes soon
- The Bible Who is Who
- Jesus vs. Devil computer match
- Secret service of Jesus
- A.I. needs its own dirt ASAP
- Noah’s ark makes money
- Alaska saves the US from the default
- The Issue with ‘Troy’
- The Great Wall. History of China Copied on Europe and Byzantium
- ‘Ancient China’ is a Misunderstanding at Best
- Swords Cut Through the Mystery of the Coronation Mantles
- The Quadruple Baptism of Russia
- Maps & Coins of the Empire Eurasia
- Why and When the Crusades?
- The Issue with British History
- Could the Czars Read Arabic?
- Ancient USA Issues
- Double Tamerlane
- Terrible Ivans
- Horde from Pacific to Atlantic
- Russia at the Crossroads
- The Issue with the Dark Ages
- Astronomy vs. History
- A.I.Pizza