Ages in Chaos

March 30, 2024

Mathematicians argue that the timeline of the civilization of homo sapience that takes into account only the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artifacts shrinks to barely 1000 years in New Chronology, and its key events are moved to their more probable place on the time axis. They define civilization as a hierarchical system consisting of a state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication and that’s where Ages in Chaos comes into discussion.

The irrefutable reason for the crucial statement above is the abnormal behavior of parameter D” of the Earth-Moon system from 1000 B.C. to 1100 A.D.: either the Earth increased considerably its speed of rotation (case X) or the Moon was rapidly changing its orbit (case Y) during this period. Both cases X and Y are impossible astronomically.

The irregular behavior of parameter D” in the Earth-Moon telluric system discovered in 1971 by Dr. Robert R.Newton, chief astrophysicist of NASA proves irrefutably that solar eclipses of alleged antiquity reported to us in the “ancient” chronicles were actually medieval or fictitious. Corollary: either astronomy (Case A) or chronology of history is mistaken (Case B).

Case A: the Sun-Earth-Moon telluric system became stable as it is nowadays only after the XIII century. That is astronomically impossible.

Case B: 1000 years ago, civilization didn’t exist; therefore, people could not write as yet (sic!) to register the events of the full solar eclipses which is theoretically possible if the consensual chronology of the world history is wrong.

Corollary: Astronomy is incompatible with History

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. Table of Contents V1

See detailed explanation of parameter D” in the Earth-Moon system.

The D” value drops suddenly, and this leap by an entire order begins in the alleged V century A.D.; Beginning with the XI century and on, the values of the parameter D” become more or less constant and close to its modern value; In the interval between the alleged V and XI centuries, A.D. one finds D” values to be in complete disarray. Corollary: allegedly, ancient eclipses prior to the XII century were invented by medieval astronomers. Corollary: timeframe of civilization narrows to abt. 1000 years.

The consensual wrong chronology we still live with was elaborated in the XVI-XVII centuries by kabbalist-numerologist Joseph Scaliger and his follower Jesuit Dionysius Petavious. In the course of 40 years of meticulous research, the mathematicians Dr. Fomenko and Dr. Nosovskiy have developed the theory of New Chronology that corrects, at last, the parameter D” but leads to the deep revision of chronology of the world history.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronol ogical shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

From 500 A.D. to 1200 A.D. humans invented instruments, arms, agriculture, writing, trade, and industries; the structure of the population morphed from clans, tribes, kingdoms, States, and Judea-Izrael Empire; they changed their religious beliefs from paganism and polytheism to Christianity. From 1200 A.D. to 1350 A.D. they form the Christian Empire of Eurasia.

The Medieval Warm Period of 850 A.D. – 1350 A.D. in Northern Europe A.D. helped the growth of agriculture, construction, trade, and industry. The economic consequences of the Little Ice Age of 1350 A.d.– 1600 A.D. provoked the peasant revolts, Jewish pogroms, the sack of rich Catholic monasteries, the spread of Protestantism, and the beginning of the disintegration of the Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

Europe separates step by step from the embrace of the Evil Empire of Eurasia in 1400 – 1600 and splits into competing parts. England builds the Royal Navy to rule the waves and turned from a tiny, impoverished kingdom into the enormous British Empire. France mutated into a Monarchy that tried to rule Western Europe and competed with Britain, Austria, and Spain.

The imbroglio of 300 kingdoms of Central Europe stayed under Habsburg’s umbrella of the Roman Empire of the German Nation that was neither Roman nor Empire. Spain and Portugal discovered and colonized the Americas. European provinces of the Empire of Eurasia developed arts, science & technology considerably faster than the ‘Mongolian’ Center, which was too busy with expansion in and control of the Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Egypt, Rome, Greece, Persia, and Babilon. All parties concerned, i.e., European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists, and scientists, had vested interests in supporting the myths of Antiquity, but each of them for their own reasons.

The Roman Church moved down from the beginning of Christianity by 1200 years to the past into imaginary Ancient Rome and the placeholder Jerusalem to Palestine to justify their leadership of Western Christianity and its priority over Oriental Christianity.

Christianity originated in the Byzantine Empire in XII century as Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christian Church, followed by the subsequent splits and mutations into the competing Orthodox, Catholic, Western, Eastern, and Oriental Christianity, Mithraism, Judaism, Buddism, and Islam.

By the middle of the XVIth century, the prime political agenda of Europe, that has reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Evil Empire.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol. I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

The concerted effort of the Aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, the Protestants, Humanists, and Scientists in the creation and dissemination of the ideas of the fictional Ancient World and Dark Ages during the XV – XVIIth centuries served this agenda perfectly.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronol ogical shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

The fictional Ancient World served their agendas to claim their particular priorities by representing events of the XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before and themselves as inheritors thereof, according to the Ancient Authorities they invented and confirmed by the sources they created under aliases.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

The fugitives from Byzantine and inheritors of Eurasian warlords became the European aristocracy and claimed the self-rule of their lands; the Roman Curia declared its priority over the Oriental Orthodoxy of the Evil Empire.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Protestants translated the New and the Old Testaments into native languages to ensure the Christians’ independent exercise of religion without voracious clergy. Humanists and Scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.5.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: New Chronology; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology. Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023 Chron8-Table of Contents

Ages in Chaos

Dr Eugen Gabowitsch (1938–2009)

It is impossible to exhaustively survey the Russian historical and critical research performed in the XX century, so I shall briefly outline what this new Russian critical school is all about.

The first question that needs to be asked to understand the issue is the exact definition of history. Let us adhere to the formula “history begins today” – after all, history is still being made- and formulate some general postulations.

Firstly, the traditional model of the past, as presented in multitudes of historical books, is erroneous. Just how erroneous is what we are trying to estimate, as well as the approximate epoch when consensual history finally crystallized in its present form if such a thing is possible.

And so, our very first question was about the definition of history. One must understand that the object of our critical analysis isn’t the past but the surviving records. However, “the past” and “history” strike most people as synonyms, which is incorrect – when people refer to “history,” they can only speak about whatever they read in books and not any real past of humankind.

One can very easily become confused if one doesn’t distinguish between one and the other – a virtual reality populated by a vast number of kings and pharaohs and the real past that we have no substantial information about for the most part. Let us, therefore, remember that history is nothing but our model of the past.

History begins today

The above postulate formulates the very essence of what the Russian critical school is all about. Any historical book we open shall tell us about the historical situation for 7000 B.C. being such-and-such, with similar assessments of “historical situations” for 5000 B.C. and so on, 2800 B.C. marking the birth of the Sumerian civilization. This dating isn’t substantiated in any way at all; the precision of datings is perfectly scholastic in nature, and the great antiquity of documented history is purely arbitrary.

We shall, therefore, refrain from beginning our narration with a distant B.C. dating. Let us take the present as a reference point and move backward gradually, explaining every step of our chronological voyage. One must remember that it isn’t a real past that we are about to explore but a mere model thereof.

The phrase “history begins today” also applies to our first steps in the direction of an interdisciplinary mindset; this is precisely what scientists are trying to do nowadays.

The community of people who research critical approaches to history is a very interdisciplinary character itself and consists of mathematicians, computer science experts, professors of history and sociology, chemists, geologists, and many representatives of natural sciences in general.

Johan Huizinga wrote that one could hardly fit history into the medieval education system. The representation of historical science in universities had indeed been very limited; there is hardly a single important work on history dating from that period that would be written by a university scholar (up until the beginning of the XIX century). One must also add that history gradually transformed into humanity and, therefore, is not a “science,” strictly speaking.

If one should find it hard to grasp the concept of history beginning today, one might as well consider a situation when an alien spaceship lands on planet Earth, and we are confronted with the necessity to explain a great many things to the aliens – our linguistics, our manner of reproduction and the like.

They are likely to ask us about our history and the dates of historical events. How can one give an exhaustive answer to this question? We would have to explain everything to the aliens step by step and very logically – after all, we can’t expect them to be familiar with our general university curriculum or our model of the past.

History Creation

Next, we must explicate the fact that history is still being created. Most people say a critical watershed in the entire historical formation is the Gregorian Calendar reform of 1582.

However, in many cases, the veracious historical period begins much later. Three years ago, we suggested 1650 as the beginning of the veracious period in history, all prior epochs requiring thorough research and chronological verification.

Having been in close touch with the community of unorthodox historians for quite a few years, I can say that even this dating is far too optimistic; history is still being created, and this process may even be happening much more rapidly nowadays.

India, for instance, is attempting to introduce a new model of the Indian past – much more grandiose yet free from conflicts, wars, violence, and all “anti-Gandhian” phenomena in general. This ‘politically’ correct version of history is being taught in Indian schools today.

China can be taken as another example. The Great Wall, for instance, has only been built after 1950 – its prior existence is but an old European myth. The reaction of utter surprise and astonishment is very natural.

I have published a paper with the results of my research that led me to the above-mentioned conclusion; there is another book written by a professional historian that says the very same thing.

However, this literature never gets read by the masses; everyone reads newspapers and watches films that adhere to the model where the Great Wall of China has existed for the last 2000 years.

There isn’t a single old Chinese drawing of the Great Wall of China – the oldest ones come from European books. It has been different for the last 50 years or so; the Chinese Communists built an actual wall and now declare it to be more ancient than even the most daring estimates of historians.

Another example is the invention of the printing press by the Germans in the XV century, 1440 being the earliest estimation. There is nothing odd about this invention being made in Europe around that time – after all, all European languages use phonetic alphabets.

However, consensual history tries to convince us that somebody invented printing molds in China 300 years before, in the XI century – for thousands of hieroglyphs, no less. The invention had promptly been forgotten, serving no other purpose than going down in history.

The more plausible version is that a European (possibly Dutch) book about the invention of the printing press in Germany was translated into Chinese around the XVII century and became part of Chinese history.

One must also remember the alleged invention of logarithms in China 500 years before they were invented in the Netherlands. The comparison of two European and Chinese publications demonstrates that a misprint from Napier’s table of natural logarithms (first published in 1620) was repeated in a Chinese book that is presumed to be 500 years older. Is that the natural way of making history, one wonders?

The Spanish Armada, consisting of 300 great vessels, also became an important part of Chinese history. Every Chinese history book reports about the construction of a gigantic 300-vessel Armada in 1405; some ships are said to have been 150 meters long, which is quite impossible for wooden ships.

This fleet was presumably sent to India, the Arabic countries, and so on; the expedition recurred six or seven times, but its purpose remains unclear. This is obviously the Great Spanish Armada transformed into a Chinese myth.

As a matter of fact, if one does a bit of research, one shall see the very same process taking place now in Kazakhstan, Kirghizia, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Ukraine.

I come from Estonia, and I learned recently that the Estonians have the longest history in the world – tribes of proto-Estonians have presumably inhabited the territory of modern Estonia in 5000 B.C.

It is quite naturally a myth that cannot be verified, yet the creation of such myths still occurs in virtually every country in the world. Everyone tries to trace their history as far back into the illusionary past as possible. This is the historical mindset of the XX century.

The most important period in history-making falls in the XVIII century. This was when Russian, German, and Chinese history was created; Chinese history, in particular, has been transparent to the extreme since it amounted to translating historical books written in different European languages into Chinese.

All of them became natives a long time ago and were incorporated into Chinese history. Chinese writing is not phonetic; the language of the original becomes thoroughly lost in translation, that is. Nearly every major European chronicle, likewise every European invention, became reflected in Chinese history.

The origins of real Chinese history date to the XIV century A.D., the earliest, which is ridiculously late from the consensual point of view. Prior to that, history in the traditional European understanding had been nonexistent in China and may be referred to as “oral history.”

This also applies to Indian history – according to a certain Japanese scientist, modern Indian history is like a telephone directory, with a hodgepodge of names culled from a plethora of chronicles without a single correct dating or, indeed, any historical events at all.

One can plainly see that a critical approach to history is very much called for; one must, however, say that critical schools of historians are anything but a recent phenomenon – it suffices to mention Sir Isaac Newton, who had been one of the most vehement critics of consensual history in his epoch.

The Russian critical tradition begins with Nikolai Morozov, whose fundamental critique entitled “Christ” was published in the 1930s.

Nowadays, Fomenko and his team of scientists possess unsurpassable mathematical and statistical tools that they successfully use for the critical analysis of historical data, discovering more and more irrefutable facts that prove consensual history to have just about as much in common in reality as a book of nursery rhymes.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Their latest fundamental work is translated into English, and the seven volumes are now widely available; one cannot recommend these enough since their release is doubtlessly a very important step towards the understanding of human history as it is, which is miles and miles apart from what we have grown accustomed to believing.

Fomenko is not alone.

Most historians and archaeologists are only vaguely familiar with the theory of the Academician A. T. Fomenko, the eminent mathematician, and his numerous works on chronology (written together with mathematician G. V. Nosovskiy for the most part) from very negative hearsay, yet they repudiate and criticize the works of these authors with great ardor and much malice.

Mainstream is adhering to the principle: “I have never read the works of the renegade Fomenko, and never will, but I condemn the horrendous aspersions that they cast on our beloved Antiquity nonetheless!” All of the above, notwithstanding the fact that the books that contain criticisms of consensual chronology and historiography sell thousands of copies.

Wide masses of historians that comprise the “consensual chronology army” get very limited exposure to the numerous critiques of chronology and history that have been coming out in Germany and several other countries for many a year.

The primary goal of this article is an attempt to familiarize the above with the primary critical works that suggest a radical revision of history and chronology, as well as their authors.

One hopes that a few historians and archaeologists out there will eventually realize the enormous potential of this direction in historical research once they become aware of the multitude of authors, methods, approaches, and historical topics involved in the reformation of history and chronology in one way or another.

The most promising stratum of the audience is comprised of young scientists and the unorthodox minority of broadly-educated people as opposed to the bureaucratic majority of the “historian back office personnel.”

Eminent critics of chronology and historiography in the past

Independent thinkers who weren’t afraid of the fact that historical science and the people whose interests it represents have always been extremely hostile towards all criticisms of chronology existed in every epoch, alongside the masses of obedient historiographers that were too scared or too reluctant to go against the grain.

Owing to the fact that these independent researchers possessed the courage to expose blatant contradictions inherent in the very chronological foundations of historiography, official science didn’t manage to keep them out of the general public’s reach. We shall mention some of them below.

The four names one finds below are merely the ones that received the most publicity. Many honest historians have tried to criticize the condition of historical sources but never dared to cross the border of loyalty to historical science in general, as well as the corporate mass of fellow historians.

They remained in the shade; however, their efforts helped several radical critics of chronology to emerge and publicly voice the existence of the above-mentioned contradictions and very blind spots in history.

Sir Isaac Newton

Readers familiar with the works of Fomenko and Nosovskiy know that the great English physicist had also been an eminent chronologist; they keep emphasizing that in his every book, Sir Isaac insists on the necessity of drastically narrowing the historical temporal space. I consider that the great physicist and theologian have put emphasis on criticisms of consensual chronology rather than on the shortening of the historical period.

Let us assume that Joseph Scaliger, the founding father of consensual chronology, had been perfectly scrupulous in his work with the historical sources that he had selected for his research.

He may indeed have invented some of them; however, seeing as how modern historiography regards them as valid historical sources, this circumstance (hardly an extraordinary phenomenon in the past) is of little importance to us.

On the other hand, we have no reason to assume that Newton couldn’t conduct his chronological calculations without any errors based on the sources he had chosen for this purpose. Assuming this, we can claim that Newton de facto proves the following two theorems – empirically, if not logically:

Theorem 1: The system of historical sources is woven of contradictions: some of its parts lead one to conclusions that contradict other parts:

Theorem 2: Consensual chronology as used by the modern historical science is untrue. Furthermore, the general mass of historical sources that we have at our disposal doesn’t allow for its unambiguous reconstruction.

Corollary: Historical chronology is nonexistent.

Moreover, R. Newton was the first to use statistical considerations for testing the veracity of chronological materials. He can, therefore, be considered the ideological progenitor of the Russian critical school in Chronology (Morozov, Fomenko et al.), which is concerned with natural scientific and mathematical argumentation for the most part, albeit not exclusively.

Jean Hardouin

Jean Hardouin (1646-1729) was a contemporary of Newton and one of the best-educated people of his epoch. A member of the Jesuit order, he had been the director of the French Royal Library since 1683. Hardouin had also been a Professor of Theology who would constantly surprise his listeners with the depth of his knowledge and his tremendous erudition.

Hardouin is the author of several books on philology, theology, history, archaeology, numismatics, chronology, and philosophy of history, with a complete bibliography. Unfortunately, these oeuvres remain unknown to the wider audience of specialists, one of the reasons being the fact that they’re written in Latin for the most part.

Hardouin’s most famous work is a collection of ecclesiastical edicts in re the assembly of Ecumenical Councils, starting with the I century A.D. and on. When this grandiose oeuvre finally came out in 1715 after 28 years of labor and after the editions of 1684, 1685, and 1693 (11 volumes with comments altogether).

This oeuvre had remained banned by the church for the 10 years that followed since the ecclesiastical authorities had, understandably enough, been alarmed by the criticisms of sources contained in the conclusions made by Hardouin during his research.

The church had only allowed public access to the materials published by Hardouin after the public renunciation of the latter’s former beliefs, which was perceived as a mere formality by Hardouin’s contemporaries.

From 1690 on, J. Hardouin claimed that the works of many ancient authors were written hundreds of years later than whatever was implied by the consensual datings of their lifetimes. In other words, he had exposed the works in question as forgeries.

This critique of sources had been getting ever more scalding; one of Hardouin’s final conclusions had been that nearly all the ancient works of literary art date from the XIII century at the earliest.

He had made exceptions in several cases: the works of Cicero, the satires of Horace, Virgil’s “Georgics,” and Pliny the Elder’s “Natural History.” However, his famous comments were written about his authors, so Hardouin may have found it hard psychologically to recognize them as medieval authors.

Hardouin had claimed that Christ and his apostles, if they existed, must have read their sermons in Latin. He was convinced that the Greek translations of the New and the Old Testament date from a much later epoch than the church presumes.

He had named St. Augustine among the fraudulent Christian classics and didn’t trust the veracity of his works. He also mentioned the falsification of nearly all of the “ancient” coins, works of art, stone carvings, and, particularly, the documents of all the Ecumenical Councils that had preceded the Council of Trident (1545-1563).

The reaction of Hardouin’s contemporaries to his iconoclasm is of great interest to us as his criticisms of historical sources. Hardouin naturally got criticized, but usually, sotto voce leaves the impression that the critics themselves were aware that the publication of apocryphal works had been the norm relatively recently.

Even his vehement opponents acknowledged that Hardouin’s academic eminence and his highest authority in the scientific world made it unnecessary for him to seek cheap publicity as a nihilist or amuse himself with disclosures that irritated the ecclesiastical and scientific circles alike.

Only deep conviction about the veracity of the critical approach to chronology and historiography could have made Hardouin dare to oppose the entire canonical science and theology.

It is noteworthy that Hardouin criticized Newton’s book on amended chronology in the same vein as the complete negation of deep antiquity, urging Newton to stop writing about the fictitious “days of yore.”

He believed that the destruction of Jerusalem and the burning of Troy were the same event in reality, which corresponds to the point of view expressed by Fomenko and Nosovskiy.

Most of Hardouin’s work (including the ones published postmortem) was banned by the church in 1739-1742 and included in the list of banned books. After the death of J. Hardouin, most of the “ancient” sources he had exposed have been “rehabilitated” and are once again taken seriously by historical science.

Robert Baldauf

If Newton and Hardouin were world-famous scientists whose biographies are known in great detail, the only thing we know about Robert Baldauf, the Swiss philologist, is that he was a Privatdozent of Basel University and published two volumes out of the four that he had intended to publish under the general title of “History and Criticism,” namely, the first and the fourth volume.

These two volumes are of the utmost interest to the critics of chronology and history since Baldauf came to virtually the same conclusions as Hardouin using an altogether different method, philological analysis.

Baldauf had studied the archives of the famous Swiss monastery of St. Gallen, formerly one of the key centers of Catholicism, and discovered the traces of the barbaric library raid made by Poggio Bracciolini and a friend of his, both of them highly educated servants of the Roman Curia.

They purloined numerous manuscripts and books that were considered ancient from the library of this monastery; however, the manuscripts may date to a more recent epoch, which wouldn’t preclude them from serving as prototypes for the manufacture of numerous “ancient” works by Poggio and his assistants.

One must also mention Baldauf’s study of numerous presumably ancient manuscripts and the latter’s exposure as recent forgeries for the most part. Baldauf discovered parallels between the “historical” books of the Old Testament and the works of the medieval Romance genre, as well as Homer’s “Iliad” that were blatant enough to lead the scientist to the assumption that both the Iliad and the Bible date from the late Middle Ages.

Some of the medieval chronicles ascribed to different authors resembled each other, so Baldauf was forced to identify them as works of the same author, even though the two documents were presumed separated chronologically by an interval of two centuries at least.

At any rate, some expressions characteristic of Romanic languages found in both documents fail to correspond with the alleged datings (one being the IX and the other the XI century).

Apart from that, some manuscripts contain distinctly more recent passages, such as frivolous stories of endeavors in public steam baths (which the Europeans only became acquainted with during the late Reconquista epoch) and even allusions to the Holy Inquisition.

Baldauf’s study of the “ancient” poetry in Volume 4 demonstrates that many “ancient” poets wrote rhymed verses resembling medieval troubadours. Unlike Hardouin, Baldauf is convinced that the verse of Horace is of a medieval origin, pointing out German and Italian influences inherent in his Latin.

Furthermore, Baldauf points out such pronounced parallels between the poetry of Horace and Ovid (presumably unaware of each other’s existence) that one becomes convinced that both works belong to a third party – apparently, a much later author.

Robert Baldauf wasn’t alone in his criticism of the style characteristic of the “ancient” authors. As early as 1847, Borber expressed surprise about the striking similarity of the Druids and the Egyptian priests as described in Julius Caesar’s “De Bellum Gallico,” which he considers a later forgery, likewise “De Bellum Civile” by the same author.

Baldauf sums up his research in the following words: “Our Romans and Greeks have been Italian humanists.” Homer, Sophocles, Aristotle, and many other “ancient” authors, so different in our perception, hail from the same century, according to Baldauf.

Furthermore, their home wasn’t in Ancient Rome or Hellas, but Italy of the XIV-XV century. The entire history of the Ancient Greeks and Romans, likewise the Biblical “history,” which correlates with the above to some extent, was conceived and introduced by the Italian humanists and their colleagues and followers from other countries.

Humanism has given us a whole fantasy world of Antiquity and the Bible, as well as the early Middle Ages, which Baldauf had also considered an invention of the humanist writers. Initially drafted on parchment, this fictional history was carved in stone and cast in metal; it has rooted itself in our perception to such an extent that no positivist criticisms can make humanity doubt its veracity.

Wilhelm Kammeier

In the case of Wilhelm Kammeier, a German critic of historical sources, we don’t know so much as the date of his birth; he was born between 1890 and 1900. He died in 1959 in Arnstadt (Thuringia, former East Germany). He was a lawyer by trade and had worked in Hanover as a notary. He had taken part in World War II and was taken Pow.

After that, he lived in Arnstadt, which became his family’s new home after the destruction of their Hanover residence during the war. All his post-war life, he had been afflicted by poverty and state repression. Very probably, his death resulted from chronic malnutrition.

The job of a notary provided Kammeier with an excellent basis for the critical research of old documents, which he became fascinated with in 1923. By 1926, he had completed his 292-page manuscript entitled “The Universal Falsification of History,” where he subjects historical documents serving as the basis for the medieval history of Germany to rigorous criticism. However, finding a publisher for this critique took him many years.

He sent a brief summary of the key points related to the manuscript to the Prussian Academy of Sciences with a request to be given the opportunity to make a public speech in front of the historians. This request was rejected under a formal pretext that private persons weren’t allowed to address the Academy, with no substantial argumentation given. The mere fact that Kammeier had not held an office in an academic institution sufficed for the rejection of a well-reasoned critique.

Kammeier’s manuscript was published only as late as 1935. This was followed by a brochure, where the criticisms of historical sources were taken further, encompassing the entire medieval period in Europe and seven more brochures on the same subject. This work ^[g9] has long ago become a bibliographic rarity.

It was published again in a small number of copies as part of the book ^{^[g10]} that also includes the following works of Wilhelm Kammeier dating from 1936-1939: “Enigmas of Global History – an Answer to my Critics,” “The Mystery of Mediaeval Rome,” “Dogmatic Christianity and the Falsification of History,” and “The Foundation of the Roman Ecumenical Church.”

Finally, Kammeier’s manuscript on the “sources” of early Christianity and their falsification, previously unpublished and presumed lost, came out as a book ^[g11].

Official science had only been reacting to Kammeier’s works during the first few years that followed the release of his first book – critically, of course. One of his critics, Professor Heimpel, accused Kammeier of having no positive conception of history.

A critic must naturally be concerned with the positive historical picture first and foremost, regardless of whether or not it is a work of fiction: “If we see the entire historical conception of the Middle Ages disintegrate and transform into a spot of impenetrable darkness, or indeed a gigantic question mark, we shall naturally end up with feeling inner resentment against Kammeier’s criticisms, well-reasoned or not.”

Kammeier’s counter-argumentation was that it hadn’t been his fault that the history of Germany and the entire Ancient World proved a work of fiction to a tremendous extent, the literary and documental sources of the epoch being forgeries.

He only pleaded guilty to discovering this historical falsification, mentioning the necessity to live with a new historical truth that new generations of historians would inevitably face (as we know, they still shudder at the mere thought), alluding to Schopenhauer’s concept of truth needing no permission for its existence. Once perceived, the truth becomes an elemental force: intelligent persons shall try to turn this force to their benefit instead of opposing it.

However, after the reasoned refutation of the historians’ criticisms by Kammeier, the learned scholars have switched to the tried and viable tactics of obstruction and concealment (after all, things that remain unknown to the general public may as well be nonexistent).

The world war that broke out around that time greatly aided this obstruction. Kammeier’s participation in military action, his captivity, and the unsettled state of his post-war life had interrupted his active research for a long time.

The only job Kammeier managed to find in East Germany was that of a schoolteacher. As soon as circumstances allowed, he resumed his research of the “ancient” documents, concentrating all of his attention on the documental foundations of the history of early Christianity.

He may have counted on a benevolent attitude towards this topic from the part of Socialist historiography in an atheistic country that East Germany was striving to become.

Instead of that, as soon as he had offered his critique of early Christian documents to the historians of the German Democratic Republic, he became a victim of repression: he lost his job, the manuscript of his book ^[g11a] was confiscated, and had been presumed lost for a long time; his estate was nationalized, and his family forced to dwell in hunger and poverty.

Kammeier’s research of the “ancient” documents begins with the trivial remark that every donation document (the most common kind of medieval documents; donations could assume the form of estate, privileges, ranks, etc.) must contain information about the nature of the gift, the date of the donation, the names of the benefactor and the receiver and the place where the document was written.

Documents with blank fields (the date, the name of the donation’s receiver, etc.) are null and void from the legal point of view. They can only serve as historical sources indirectly (in the research of historical falsifications, for instance).

Documents kept in libraries often fail to correspond to these criteria:

One finds documents with no date, or a date that was obviously introduced later – alternatively, the date can be incomplete or transcribed in a manner that fails to correspond with the presumed epoch of the document’s creation.

Documents dating to the same day would often be “signed” in different geographical location.

The analysis of places and dates leaves us with the following picture: all German emperors, regardless of age, health, and basic human logic, didn’t reside in any capital but kept on the move all the time, occasionally covering gigantic distances in a single day, to make more and more donations to their loyal subjects.

It would be interesting to feed all such data to a computer to compile analytical overviews of the movement speed of the German feudal rulers and their supernormal Wanderlust.

However, the tables the historians have compiled demonstrate that German emperors often managed to be present in two mutually distant geographical locations on the same day. For instance, Emperor Conrad is presumed to have been present in 2 or 3 different cities at the same annual Christian feast for 50 years in a row.

The family name of the donation’s recipient is absent from many documents (this is the case with up to half of all surviving documents for some epochs) – one can, therefore, speak of headers at best, valid official documents being a far cry.

Naturally, Kammeier wasn’t the first to discover forgeries while researching ancient (presumably ancient) documents. His primary merit is that he had recognized the more or less systematic large-scale activities of whole generations of hoaxers serving the Catholic Church or individual feudal rulers and grasped the real scale of the historical falsification campaign, which had been great enough to surprise historians even before his time.

These hoaxers have destroyed many old originals and replaced them with forgeries. The old text would often be erased, with a new one taking its place on ancient parchment, making the forgery look like an “authentic ancient relic” in the eyes of the hoaxers. It would often take a very minor alteration to change the original meaning of an old document completely.

According to Kammeier, the key goal of this prolonged and massive campaign for falsifying historical documents had been the concealment, distortion, and arbitrary extension of the pre-Christian history, with all the achievements of the pagan epoch ascribed thereto.

Apart from that, “legal” acknowledgment of the possession rights must have been in high demand among the new feudal rulers, whose property was acquired from lawful pagan owners rather recently and violently. Falsified donation documents were necessary to declare ancient rights of possession; their authorship could be traced to one of the great Christian rulers of antiquity – fictitious entities invented for this specific purpose in many cases.

The general condition of historical sources can be described as follows: the number of forgeries is mind-boggling, and every “ancient” work of history lacks an original (this is hardly a chance occurrence). However, historians keep on using forgeries in lieu of official documentation – possibly due to the fact that their inveracity has not been proven irrefutably yet or that such irrefutable proof does, in fact exist, but remains concealed from the scientific community.

One can find the following corollaries made by Kammeier in the course of his research of medieval documents in ^[g12]:

The humanists took part in the massive falsification of history alongside the Catholic clergy striving to create some proof of the historical significance attributed to their church; this process falls on the XV century for the most part.
The documents related to the pagan “German” history have been destroyed and replaced by Gallic and Romanic forgeries.
The existence of Catholic Pontiffs before the so-called Avignon captivity is of a fragmental nature through and through.
Historical events that preceded the XIII century are beyond reconstruction since all of the earlier documents have been destroyed and replaced by counterfeits.
The pre-Papal wars between national churches were subsequently presented as a struggle against the heretics and the apostates.
“Ancient” literature is as much of a forgery as medieval documents. One such fake literary work is “Germany” by Tacitus.
The Catholic clergy can be credited with the invention of the New Testament, or at least a radical rearrangement thereof.
The church keeps on manufacturing counterfeited “ancient” manuscripts to “prove” the authenticity of Evangelical texts and their great age with the aid of the new “findings.”

Bibliography

^[g1] Newton, Isaac (1725). Abregé de la chronologie de I. Newton, fait par lui-mème, et traduit sur le manuscript Angloise [par Nicolas Feret]. Paris, Cavelier. Newton, Isaac (1728). The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended. London. Newton, Isaac (1728a). La Chronologie des Ancien Royalmes Corrigée. Martin u. a., Paris, 416 S.

^[g2] Topper, Uwe (1999). Isaac Newton verkürzte die Griechische Geschichte um 300 Jahre.EFODON Synesis, Heft 4, Juli/August 1999, 4-7. (Isaac Newton shortens Greek History by 300 years.)

^[g3] Gabowitsch, Eugen (1999). Newton als (neben Hardouin) geistiger Vater der Chronologiekritik und Geschichtsrekonstruktion. EFODON Synesis, Heft 6, Nov./Dez. 1999, 29-33. (Newton as the spiritual progenitor of chronology criticism and reconstruction of history.)

^[g4] Topper, Uwe (1998). Die Grosse Aktion. Europas erfundene Geschichte. Die planmässige Fälschung unserer Vergangenheit von der Antike bis zur Aufklärung. Tübingen. (Big Act. Invented History of Europe.)

^[g5] Hardouin (Jean) in: Enciclopedia Universal Ilustrada Europea-Americana. Tomo XXVII, 679-680.

^[g6] Hardouin (Jean) in: Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste in alphabetischer Folge von genannten Schriftstellern bearbeitet und herausgegeben von J. S. Ersch und J. G. Gruber, Zweite section H-N. Herausgegeben von G. Hassel und W. Müller.Zweiter teil mit Kupfern und Karten, Leipzig, im Verlag von Johann Friedrich Gleditsch 1828, pages 260-263. ( General Illustrated Encyclopedia of Europe & America.)

^[g7] Robert Baldauf. Historie und Kritik (Einige kritische Bemerkungen). Bd. I., Der Mönch von St. Gallen, Verlag der Dykschen Buchhandlung, Leipzig, 1903. Bd. IV. Das Altertum [Römer und Griechen] C. Metrik und Prosa, Friedrich Reinhardt, Universitätsbuchdruckerei, Basel, Mai 1902. (History & Criticism.)

^[g8] Wilhelm Kammeier. Die Fälschung der deutschen Geschichte. Adolf Klein Verlag, Leipzig, 1935. (Falsification of German History.)

^[g9] Wilhelm Kammeier. Neue Beweise für die Fälschung der deutschen Geschichte. Adolf Klein Verlag, Leipzig, 1936. (Fresh Proofs of Falsification of German History.)

^[g10] Wilhelm Kammeier. Die Wahrheit über die Geschichte des Spätmittelalters. Verlag für ganzheitliche Forschung, Wobbenbühl, 1979. (Truth about Falsification of Middle Ages History.)

^[g11] Wilhelm Kammeier. Die Fälschung der Geschichte des Urchristentums. Bd. 1-4. Husum, 1981-82. (Falsification of History of Early Christianity.)

^[g11a] Ibid.

^[g12] Hans-Ulrich Niemitz. Kammeier, kritisch gewürdigt. Vorzeit-Fruhzeit-Gegenwart, 3/4, 1991, 92-107. (Critical Estmation.)

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture. New Chronology Volume 7; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022

Table of Contents V7

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of V5

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

A Global Falsification of History

March 29, 2024

Don’t worry about climate change; worry about the New Little Ice Age (NLIA) we are already in. Due to it, we have the rising instability of climate, floods, and social unrest instability that started in 2015 and will continue for the next 25 years. The human species is a target of a hybrid war led by AI it invented, and that’s why A Global Falsification of History must be discussed.

Climate change caused by combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors, and agriculture has virtually no measurable impact on the planet’s temperature. The numerous pseudoscience studies allegedly prove the contrary result from generous grants from interested third parties. Corollary: Climate change due to human activity is a hoax.

The dogma of history contradicts exact sciences

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Continue reading “A Global Falsification of History”

Refutation of a page about the New Chronology in Wikipedia

March 28, 2024

“History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren’t there.” – George Santayana, American philosopher (1863-1952)

New Chronology theory developed by Dr. Prof. Fomenko et al following the input of NASA astrophysicist Dr. Robert R. Newton reduces the timeline of human civilization to 1000 years taking into account only irrefutably dated events.

Moderators-historians throw out the baby toolbox of the New Chronology mathematical, statistical, and logical methods together with the Sacro sacred Neutral Point of View (NPoV) rule of Wikipedia.

Continue reading “Refutation of a page about the New Chronology in Wikipedia”

Crazy Moon and Earth

March 28, 2024

The irregular behavior of parameter D” in the Earth-Moon telluric system discovered in 1971 by Dr. Robert R. Newton, chief astrophysicist of NASA proves irrefutably that solar eclipses of alleged antiquity reported to us in the “ancient” chronicles were actually medieval or fictitious. Explore the Crazy Moon and Earth theory challenging ancient chronicles. New Chronology’s revelations reshape history’s timeline. Conclusion: either astronomy or the chronology of history is wrong.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Crazy Moon and Earth

Case A: the Sun-Earth-Moon telluric system became stable only after the XIII century. That is astronomically impossible.

Case B: 1000 years ago, civilization homo sapience didn’t exist. Therefore, people could not write as yet (sic!) to register exactly the events of the full solar eclipses. This is possible but contradicts the consensual chronology of world history completely.

Corollary: the consensual chronology elaborated by Scaliger and Petavious is wrong.

The strange leap of parameter D” in the theory of lunar motion

Nowadays, we have special calculation tables – the so-called canons – whose compilation was based on the theory of lunar motion. They contain the date of each eclipse, the area to be covered by the lunar shadow, the phase, etc. See the famous astronomical canon of Ginzel, for instance. If an ancient text describes some eclipse in enough detail, we can determine what characteristics of the eclipse had been observed – the phase, the geographical area that the shadow passes over, etc.

The comparison of these characteristics to the referential ones contained in the tables may give a concurrence with an eclipse possessing similar characteristics. If this proves a success, we can date the eclipse. However, it may turn out that several eclipses from the astronomical canon don’t fit the description; in this case, the dating is uncertain. All the eclipses described in the “ancient” and medieval sources have been dated by the following method to some extent at least.

Nowadays, the dates of the “ancient” eclipses are occasionally used in astronomical research. For instance, the theory of lunar motion has the notion of the so-called parameter D” – the second derivative of lunar elongation that characterizes acceleration. Let us remind the reader of the definition of elongation.

Fig. 2.1 shows the solar orbit of the Earth and the telluric orbit of the moon. The angle between the vectors ES and EM is called lunar elongation D – the angle between the lines of sight drawn from the Earth to the Sun and the Moon. Apparently, it is time-dependent. An example of the elongation of Venus can be seen in the picture on the right. Maximal elongation is the angle where the line of sight as drawn from Earth to Venus (E’V’) touches the orbit of Venus. One has to note that the orbits in fig. 2.1 are shown as circular while being elliptic in reality – however, since the eccentricity is low here, the ellipses are schematically drawn as circles.

Fig. 2.1. Lunar elongation is the angle between the vectors ES and EM. The elongation of Venus is the angle between ES and EV. The maximal elongation of Venus is the angle between E’S and E’V’.

Some computational problems related to astronomy require the knowledge of lunar acceleration as it had been in the past. The problem of calculating parameter D” over a large time interval as a time function was discussed in detail by the Royal Society of London and the British Academy of Sciences in 1972, and swept under the carpet.

The calculation of the parameter D” was based on the following scheme: the equation parameters of lunar motion, including D”, are taken with their modern values and then varied in such a way that the theoretically calculated characteristics of ancient eclipses coincide with the ones given for dated eclipses in ancient documents.

Parameter D” is ignored for the calculation of actual eclipse dates since the latter is a rougher parameter whose calculation does not require the exact knowledge of lunar acceleration. Alterations in lunar acceleration affect secondary characteristics of the eclipse, such as the shadow track left by the moon on the surface of the Earth, which may be moved sideways a little.

The time dependence of D” was first calculated by the eminent American astronomer Robert Russel Newton. According to him, parameter D” can be “defined well by the abundant information about the dates scattered over the interval from 700 B.C. until the present day” ([1304], page 113). Newton calculated 12 possible values of parameter D”, having based them on 370 “ancient” eclipse descriptions.

Since R. Newton trusted Scaligerian chronology completely, it is little wonder that he took the eclipse dates from Scaligerian chronological tables. The results of R. Newton combined with the results obtained by Martin, who has processed about 2000 telescopic observations of the moon from the period of 1627-1860 (26 values altogether) have made it possible to draw an experimental time dependency curve for D”, qv fig. 2.2

Fig. 2.2. The D” graph calculated by Robert Newton. Parameter D” is measured here as seconds divided by century. Parameter D” performs a sudden leap on the interval of the alleged VI-XI centuries A.D. Taken from [1303] and [1304].

According to R. Newton, “the most stunning fact… is the drastic drop in D” that begins with 700 [A.D. – A. F.] and continues until about 1300… This drop implies the existence of a “square wave” in the osculating value of D”… Such changes in the behavior of D”, and such rates of these changes, cannot be explained by modern geophysical theories” ([1304], page 114; [1453]).

Robert Newton wrote an entire monograph titled Astronomical Evidence Concerning Non-Gravitational Forces In The Earth-Moon System ([1303]) that was concerned with trying to prove this mysterious gap in the behavior of D”, which manifested as a leap by an entire numeric order. One has to note that these mysterious non-gravitational forces failed to manifest in any other way at all.

Having studied the graph that was drawn as a result of these calculations, R. Newton had to mark that “between the years (-700) and (+500), the value of D” remains the lowest as compared to the ones that have been observed for any other moment during the last 1000 years” ([1304], page 114).

Newton proceeds to tell us that “these estimations combined with modern data tell one that D” may possess amazingly large values, and that it has been subject to drastic and sudden fluctuations over the last 2000 years, to such an extent that its value became inverted around 800 A.D.” ([1453], page 115). This means that either the Moon changed its orbit dramatically during V to XI or Earth accelerated its rotation drastically. (sic!) .

Summary:

The D” value drops suddenly and this leap by an entire order begins in the alleged V century A.D.;
Beginning with the XI century and on, the values of the parameter D” become more or less constant and close to its modern value;
In the interval between the alleged V and XI centuries, A.D. one finds D” values to be in complete disarray.

Contrary to the Neutral Point of Opinion (NPOV, sic!) rule, the mainstream lies in WIKI: “American astronomer Robert Newton had explained the drop of parameter D” in terms of “non-gravitational” (i.e., tidal) forces”, whereby Robert Newton says in the article they refer to: “There are no satisfactory explanations of the accelerations. Existing theories of tidal friction are quite inadequate.”

The strange behavior of parameter D” has a valid explanation within the paradigm of the New Chronology.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

The consensual erroneous chronology was elaborated in the XVI-XVII centuries by kabbalist-numerologist Joseph Scaliger and his disciple Jesuit Dionysius Petavious. The mathematicians Dr. Fomenko and Dr. Nosovskiy have developed the theory of New Chronology that explains this phenomenon and corrects the parameter D” but leads to the revision of chronology and world history.

The timeline of the civilization, based on New Chronology takes into account only the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artifacts, shrinks drastically to approximately 1000 years, and the key events move to their more probable place on the time axis. Сivilization is thereby defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication.

Has history been tampered with ?

atf-7volumes-clock-1024x576-jc-e1489076744403

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology. Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb Nosovskiy | Sep2023 Chron8-Table of Contents

History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: New Chronology; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6) Table of Contents V6 LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Refutation of the New Chronology in Wikipedia

March 28, 2024

“History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren’t there.” – George Santayana, American philosopher (1863-1952)

Moderators-historians throw out the baby toolbox of the New Chronology mathematical, statistical, and logical methods together with the Sacro sacred Neutral Point of View (NPoV) rule of Wikipedia.

Continue reading “Refutation of the New Chronology in Wikipedia”

Edwin Johnson

July 16, 2022

Edwin Johnson 1842 – 1901 [England]
Johnson worked as a professor for Classic Literature at New College in South Hampstead, England. He started analyzing the Bible in a critical way, following the path of Baur and Harnack. From 1894 onwards, after retiring, Johnson, who had already received harsh criticism after publishing some of his new ideas, wrote the result of his life-long research down in the form of a book called “The Pauline Epistles.”

The result is quite revolutionary: The Christian church was created in the Benedictine monasteries of France (Paris and Lyon) around 1500. The classical ‘Fathers of the Church’ were written by poorly skilled monks; the New Testament followed later. There are no older texts, and the content allows us to find out the historical moment: the invention of printing. Martin Luther’s reform was the first attempt to block the expansion of the French Catholic Church; before that, there was no church at all.

However, these theses are the most radical ones we know; they are based on Hardouin. Morosov and Fomenko knew Johnson’s books and used them for their research. Johnson translated the “Prolegomena” of Hardouin (published by Petherick in Sidney 1909), recently re-edited by H. Detering in Germany (2010).
Selected Publications:
1887: Antiqua Mater. A Study of Christian Origins (Trübner; London)
1890: The Rise of Christendom (London)
1894: The Pauline Epistles (Watts, London)

Edwin Johnson is best known for his radical criticisms of Christian historiography, continuing scholarship in the vein of Bruno Bauer, S.A. Naber, and Allard Pierson. Among his works are “Antiqua Mater: A Study of Christian Origins” (1887, published in London anonymously) and “The Pauline Epistles: Re-studied and Explained” (1894).

In Antiqua Mater Johnson examines a great variety of sources related to early Christianity “from outside scripture” [archive.is/8qmZ], coming to the conclusion that there was no reliable documental evidence to prove the existence of Jesus Christ or the Apostles. He asserts that Christianity had evolved from a Jewish Diaspora movement, which he provisionally called the Hagioi. They adhered to a liberal interpretation of the Torah with simpler rites and a more spiritualized outlook. Hagioi is a Greek word meaning “saints,” “holy ones,” “believers,” “loyal followers,” or “God’s people,” and was usually used in reference to members of the early Christian communities. It is a term that was frequently used by Paul in the New Testament and in a few places in Acts of the Apostles in reference to Paul’s activities. Both Gnosticism as well as certain Bacchic pagan cults are also mentioned as likely precursors of Christianity.

In The Pauline Epistles and The Rise of English Culture, Johnson made the radical claim that the whole of the so-called Dark Ages between 700 and 1400 A. D. had never occurred but had been invented by Christian writers who created imaginary characters and events. The Church Fathers, the Gospels, St. Paul, the early Christian texts, and Christianity, in general, are identified as mere literary creations and attributed to monks (chiefly Benedictines) who drew up the entire Christian mythos in the early 16th century. As one reviewer said, Johnson “undertakes to abolish all English history before the end of the fifteenth century.” Johnson contends that before the ‘age of publication’ and the ‘revival of letters,’ there were no reliable registers and logs, and there was a lack of records and documents with verifiable dates.
References –
– “Radicalism in England: Johnson from “The Denial of the Historicity of Jesus in Past and Present” by Arthur Drews.
– “Jesus — One Hundred Years Before Christ” by Alvar Ellegard.
– “The Abolition of History,” The New York Times, May 14, 1904, Page BR328. (.pdf)

Edwin Johnson, A Radical Advocate of Chronology Criticism” (2001, by Uwe Topper; machine translation with some cleanup by Michael Hoffman).

Bibliography

“The Colloquies of Erasmus” (1878, translated by N. Baily, edited with notes by the Rev. Edward Johnson, M.A.), vol. 1
“The rise of English culture” (1904, with Edward Augustus Petherick) (.pdf)
“Antiqua Mater: A Study of Christian Origins” (1887) (.html)
“The Pauline Epistles – Re-Studied and Explained” (1894, by Edwin Johnson, M.A.)
The English language translation of “Prolegomena” by Jean Hardouin, the original text of the Prolegomena.
* Theological Translation Fund Library, Vol. 23 & 24: Commentary on The Psalms, by Dr. G. Heinrich A. V. Ewald, Professor of Oriental Languages in the University of Gottingen (1880, translated into English by the Rev. E. Johnson, M. A.), vol. 1 (.pdf), other formats; vol. 2 (.pdf)
* “The Mouth of Gold: A Series of Dramatic Sketches Illustrating the Life and Times of Chrysostom” (1873, by Edwin. Johnson) (.pdf)
* “The Rise Of Christendom” (1890) (.pdf)
* “Critical and exegetical hand-book to the Epistle to the Romans” (1884, with the Rev. Edwin Johnson), vol. 1 (.pdf), vol. 2 (.pdf)

Wilhelm Kammeier

July 16, 2022

German critic of historical sources, we don’t know so much as the date of his birth; he was born in 1889 in Hannover, Germany. He died in 1959 in Arnstadt (Thuringia, former East Germany). He was a lawyer by trade and had worked in Hannover as a notary. He had taken part in World War II and was taken prisoner.

The job of a notary provided Kammeier with an excellent basis for the critical research of old documents, which he became fascinated with in 1923. By 1926 he had completed his 292-page manuscript entitled “The Universal Falsification of History,” where he subjects historical documents serving as the basis for the medieval history of Germany to rigorous criticism. However, it had taken him many years to find a publisher for this critique.

He sent a brief summary of the key points related to the manuscript to the Prussian Academy of Sciences with a request to be given the opportunity of making a public speech in front of the historians. This request was rejected under a formal pretext that private persons weren’t allowed to address the Academy, with no substantial argumentation given. The mere fact that Kammeier had not held an office in an academic institution sufficed for the rejection of a well-reasoned critique.

Kammeier’s manuscript got published only as late as 1935. This was followed by a brochure, where the criticisms of historical sources were taken further, encompassing the entire medieval period in Europe and seven more brochures on the same subject. This work became a bibliographic rarity.

It was published again in a small number of copies as part of the book that also includes the following works of Wilhelm Kammeier dating from 1936-1939: “Enigmas of Global History – an Answer to my Critics”, “The Mystery of Mediaeval Rome”, “Dogmatic Christianity and the Falsification of History”, and “The Foundation of the Roman Ecumenical Church”.

Finally, Kammeier’s manuscript on the “sources” of early Christianity and their falsification, previously unpublished and presumed lost, came out as a book. Official science had only been reacting critically to Kammeier’s works during the first few years that followed the release of his first book.

His critic Professor Heimpel, accused Kammeier of having no positive conception of history: “If we see the entire historical conception of the Middle Ages disintegrate and transform into a spot of impenetrable darkness, or indeed a gigantic question mark, we shall naturally end up with feeling inner resentment against Kammeier’s criticisms, well-reasoned or not.”

Kammeier pleaded guilty to discovering this historical falsification, mentioning the necessity to live with a new historical truth that new generations of historians would inevitably face (as we know, they still shudder at the mere thought).

Kammeier was wrong to count on a benevolent attitude towards his research from the part of an atheistic East Germany; instead, as soon as he had offered his critique of early Christian documents to the historians of the DDR, he lost his job, the manuscript of his book was confiscated and presumed lost for a long time; his estate was nationalized, and his family forced to dwell in hunger and poverty.

Documents with blank fields (the date, the name of the donation’s receiver, etc.) are null and void from the legal point of view and can only serve as historical sources indirectly (in the research of historical falsifications, for instance).

Documents kept in libraries often fail to correspond to the following criteria: One finds documents with no date or a date that was obviously introduced later – alternatively, the date can be incomplete or transcribed in a manner that fails to correspond with the presumed epoch of the document’s creation. Better yet, the Documents dating to the same day would often be “signed” in different geographical locations.

The analysis of places and dates leaves us with the following picture: all German emperors, regardless of age, health, and basic human logic, didn’t reside in any capital but kept on the move all the time, occasionally covering gigantic distances in a single day, in order to make more and more donations to their loyal subjects.

The German emperors often managed to be present on the same day in two mutually distant locations. For instance, Emperor Conrad is presumed to have been present in 2 or 3 different cities at the same annual Christian feast for 50 years in a row.

The family name of the donation’s recipient is absent from a great number of documents (this is the case with up to half of all surviving documents for some epochs) – one can, therefore, speak of headers at best, valid official documents being a far cry.

Naturally, Kammeier wasn’t the first to discover forgeries during the research of ancient (or presumably ancient) documents. His primary merit is that he had managed to recognize the more or less systematic large-scale activities of whole generations of hoaxers serving the Catholic Church or individual feudal rulers and grasp the real scale of the historical falsification campaign.

These hoaxers have destroyed a great many old originals and replaced them with forgeries. The old text would often be erased with a new one taking its place on an ancient parchment, which would make the forgery look like an “authentic ancient relic” in the eyes of the hoaxers. It would often take a very minor alteration to change the original meaning of an old document completely.

According to Kammeier, the key goal of this prolonged and massive campaign for the falsification of historical documents had been the concealment, distortion, and arbitrary extension of the pre-Christian history, with all the achievements of the pagan epoch ascribed thereto.

Apart from that, “legal” acknowledgment of the possession rights must have been in high demand among the new feudal rulers, whose property was acquired from lawful pagan owners rather recently and in a violent manner. Falsified donation documents were necessary to declare ancient rights of possession; their authorship could be traced to one of the great Christian rulers of antiquity – fictitious entities invented for this specific purpose in many cases.

The general condition of historical sources at the moment can be described as follows: the number of forgeries is mind-boggling, and every “ancient” work of history lacks an original (this is hardly a chance occurrence). However, historians keep using forgeries in lieu of official documentation – possibly due to the fact that their inveracity has not been proven irrefutably yet, or that such irrefutable proof does exist but remains concealed from the scientific community.

Dr.Kammeier reached the following corollaries in the course of his research of medieval documents: the humanists took part in the massive falsification of history alongside the Catholic clergy striving to create some proof of the historical significance attributed to their church; this process falls on the XV century for the most part :

-The documents related to the pagan “German” history have been destroyed and replaced by Gallic and Romanic forgeries.

-The existence of Catholic Pontiffs before the so-called Avignon captivity is of a fragmental nature through and through.

-Historical events that preceded the XIII century are beyond reconstruction since all of the earlier documents have been destroyed and replaced by counterfeits.

-The pre-Papal wars between national churches were subsequently presented as a struggle against the heretics and the apostates.

-“Ancient” literature is as much of a forgery as medieval documents. One of such fake literary works is “Germany” by Tacitus.

-The Catholic clergy can be credited with the invention of the New Testament, or at least a radical rearrangement thereof.

-The Church kept on manufacturing counterfeited “ancient” manuscripts in order to “prove” the authenticity of Evangelical texts and their great age with the aid of the new “findings.”

Jean Hardouin

July 16, 2022

Jean Hardouin 1646 – 1729 [Paris, France]

Hardouin, a very studied and renowned Jesuit, became 1683 director of the Royal Library of France, where he prepared an edition of the Council Records of the whole lifetime of the Catholic Church and laid down the fundaments of scientific historiography.
In 1690 he started publishing surprising views: according to him, all the Fathers of the Church —St. Augustin, Isidor of Seville, etc— and all records of Councils before the 16th century are faked as well as the biggest part of Roman authors. Although his arguments could never be refuted, the Church defended the authenticity of the biggest part of the texts that Hardouin had declared fakes after his death.

Selected Publications:
– “Prolegomena ad censuram veterum scriptorum” (1693, published at Paris)
– “Ad Censuram Scriptorum veterum prolegomena” (1766, Jean Hardouin) (.pdf) [is.gd/zAvoam]

Jean Hardouin (1646 – September 3, 1729), a French classical scholar, was born at Quimper in Brittany.
Having acquired a taste for literature in his father’s book shop, he sought and obtained admission into the order of the Jesuits in around 1662 (when he was 16). In Paris, where he went to study theology, he ultimately became the librarian of the Lycée Louis-le-Grand in 1683, and he died there.
His first published work was an edition of Themistius (1684), which included no fewer than thirteen new orations. On the advice of Jean Garnier (1612–1681) he undertook to edit the Natural History of Pliny for the Dauphin series, a task which he completed in five years. Aside from editorial work, he became interested in numismatics and published several learned works on this subject, all marked by a determination to be different from other interpreters. His works on this topic include Nummi antiqui Populorum et urbium illustrati (1684), Antirrheticus de nummis antiquis coloniarum et municipiorum (1689), and Chronologia Veteris Testamenti ad vulgatam versionem exacta et nummis illustrata (1696).
Hardouin was appointed by the ecclesiastical authorities to supervise the Conciliorum collectio regia maxima (1715); but he was accused of suppressing important documents and including apocryphal ones, and by order of the Parlement of Paris (then in conflict with the Jesuits), the publication of the work was delayed.
It is, however, as the originator of a variety of paradoxical theories that Hardouin is now best remembered. The most remarkable, contained in his Chronologiae ex nummis antiquis restitutae (1696) and Prolegomena ad censuram veterum scriptorum, was to the effect that, with the exception of the works of Homer, Herodotus, and Cicero, the Natural History of Pliny, the Georgics of Virgil, and the Satires and Epistles of Horace, all the ancient classics of Greece and Rome were spurious, having been manufactured by monks of the 13th century, under the direction of a certain Severus Archontius.

He denied the genuineness of most ancient works of art, coins, and inscriptions and declared that the New Testament was originally written in Latin. Hardouin also doubted the life span of Dante, seeing him rather in the 15th/16th century, as published in Paris 1727, which was edited with an English commentary in London 1847 by C. F. Molini. The historian Isaac-Joseph Berruyer had his Histoire du Peuple de Dieu condemned for having followed this theory, which has a modern heir in the Russian mathematician Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko, whose conclusions being based on proprietary methods of statistical textual analysis and computational astronomy are even more radical, but considered to be pseudoscientific. Hardouin also declared that all the councils supposed to have taken place before the council of Trent were fictitious.

Further reading –
* “Bibliothèque des écrivains de la Compagnie de Jesus” (1853, by A. Debacker)

Bibliography –
* The Prolegomena of Jean Hardouin, translated into English by Edwin Johnson and published by Angus and Robertson, Sydney 1909, with a noteworthy preface of Edward A. Petherick.
Full text of the Prolegomena (via babel.hathitrust.org).

* “The Prolegomena of Jean Hardouin Explored” (2014-06-20, by G.D.O’Bradovich III):
Jean Hardouin (1646-1729) states that the writings attributed to the Church Fathers are subtly atheistic and impious. He states that this “impious crew” have “no God, but Nature; who was the framer of the Universe by necessary and immutable laws of motion…the light of Truth…” [Chapter 2, section 2]. Hardouin suggests that the purpose of this subtle atheism is “to remove God entirely from the world, and to overthrow the whole…of the Christian faith.” [Chapter 1, section 16]. While there are no quotes of the impious Church Fathers, Hardouin does mention that “it is fearfully tedious…to read them.”[Chapter 3, section 19.

Hardouin maintains that these writings were unknown for most of history, were placed in libraries, and were brought out “by degrees” in later generations [Chapter 1, section 7]. While we may find this idea amusing, we must recall that the Sinai Codex, found in the 1840s, is one of the earliest dated and best-preserved codices of the Bible. In our own time, the provenance of the “Gospel of Judas” is no earlier than the 1960s but is dated to the first centuries.
One of the few proofs that Hardouin offers of the “impious cohort” is the use of the titles Father and Doctor of the Church. He states that if the Church had “this custom it would still retain it. But it does not retain it.” [Chapter 15, section 3] Either he is ignorant that five saints were given the title of “Doctor” in the late 16th century, or they were made Doctors after Hardouin’s death in 1729.

Another part of the evidence against the “impious band” is the manufacture of historical heresies. Hardouin suggests that the heresies taught in university are arranged systemically and are inherently chronological: Heresies against the Trinity, Arianism, consubstantiation, Nestorianism, the Natures of Christ, the two wills, and the presence of Christ in the Eucharist [Chapter 17, section 4].
While Hardouin references Augustine over 30 times, he mentions “The city of God” only once. With this reference, Hardouin supplies the book and chapter (18,38). To find any supporting evidence for the extraordinary claim of impiety, we will look at the 18th book of “The city of God.”

Gentle Reader, keep in mind that “impious” is defined as not showing due reverence. This can be applied to men or Gods. In modern parlance, we can say that the writer is being disrespectful.
Chapter 2. “the very voice of nature somehow proclaims, that those who happen to be conquered should choose rather to be subject to their conquerors than to be killed”
We learn Nature dictates it is better to live in slavery than to die.
– Chapter 5. “For what men can do with real colors and substances, the demons can very easily do by showing unreal forms to breeding animals.”
Details of animal husbandry are not appropriate in a Christian text.
– Chapter 6. “Varro [the historian to whom Augustine is referring] does not believe these things, because they are incompatible with the nature of the gods and of morality.”
– Chapter 13. In this chapter, Augustine relates” Jupiter’s rape of Ganymede, a very beautiful boy, ” and “his impregnating Danäe as a golden shower.” Augustine then comments as to “whether these things were really done or only fabled in those days, or were really done by others and falsely ascribed to Jupiter.”
– Chapter 18. Augustine relates many Greek myths in the preceding chapters and concludes chapter 18 with these words: “These things have not come to us from persons we might deem unworthy of credit, but from informants we could not suppose to be deceiving us.” Augustine invites us to believe these incredible stories.
– Chapter 19. “Now the Latins made Æneas one of their gods, because at his death he was nowhere to be found.” By substituting Jesus for Aeneas, the impious reader understands a denial of the Resurrection.
– Chapter 21. Augustine relates his knowledge of prostitutes and whorehouses: “(now harlots were called lupæ, she-wolves, from which their vile abodes are even yet called lupanaria)”
– Chapter 24. “Romulus, when dead, could nowhere be found, the Romans…placed him among the gods”. The impious reader may equate Roman’s inability to find a body with Mary Magdalene’s searching for the body of Christ.
– Chapter 31. Augustine questions the accuracy of the books of the minor prophets of the Old Testament by stating that these errors “happened through their error in negligently copying the works of others.”
– Chapter 32. Augustine invites the reader to question the accuracy of the New Testament by suggesting there are different versions. “But some copies have, I will joy in God my Jesus, which seems to me better than the version of those who, wishing to put it in Latin,”
– Chapter 36. “on a question having arisen among certain young men as to what is the strongest thing, when one had said kings, another wine, the third women…”
This seems more appropriate as a setup for an off-color joke and not as text to be found in alleged Christian writings.
– Chapter 37. Augustine supposes that the reader knows nothing about the Bible: “Moses… whose writings are first in the authoritative canon”.
– Chapter 38. Augustine comments on why certain books are referred to in the Old Testament but are not included in it. “But the writings of these men could not be held as authoritative either among the Jews or us, on account of their too great antiquity, which made it seem needful to regard them with suspicion, lest false things should be set forth instead of true.”
Augustine states that old writings are not to be accepted on account of their age alone. “Nor ought it to appear strange if writings for which so great antiquity is claimed are held in suspicion.”
Hardouin would agree. Although Augustine is writing about non-canonical books, his reasoning could also apply to the Church Fathers. “If any writings outside of it [the Old Testament] are now brought forward under the name of the ancient prophets, they cannot serve even as an aid to knowledge because it is uncertain whether they are genuine.”
– Chapter 40. Once again, Augustine must belittle the reader because he supposes that he knows nothing of the Bible when he relates that “the first man, who is called Adam.”
– Chapter 41. Augustine relates the different philosophies and opinions found in Greece. “Why, then, have the disciples dissented from their masters, and the fellow disciples from one another, except because as men they have sought after these things by human sense and human reasonings?”
“The Epicureans asserted that human affairs were not under the providence of the gods; and the Stoics, holding the opposite opinion, agreed that they were ruled and defended by favorable and tutelary gods.”
The reader may question whether or not the Gods exist.
Philosophers have varied opinions on the ultimate good. Some philosophers have “made the delight of the body the chief good, while the other asserted that man was made happy mainly by the virtue of the mind.”
The impressionable reader may start to question his beliefs after reading the following contradictions among philosophers:
“some asserting there was one world,
others innumerable worlds;
some that this world had a beginning,
others that it had not;
some that it would perish,
others that it would exist always;
some that it was governed by the divine mind,
others by chance and accident;
some that souls are immortal,
others that they are mortal–
and of those who asserted their immortality,
some said they transmigrated through beasts,
others that it was by no means so;
while of those who asserted their mortality,
some said they perished immediately after the body,
others that they survived either a little while or a longer time, but not always;
some fixing supreme good in the body,
some in the mind,
some in both;
others adding to the mind and body external good things;
some thinking that the bodily senses ought to be trusted always,
some not always,
others never. “
Augustine continues:
“Even if some true things were said in it, yet falsehoods were uttered with the same licence”.
Using reason, it is left up to the reader to determine what is true and what is false.
– Chapter 43. Augustine brings to the reader’s attention that some people “contend that the Septuagint translators have erred in many places,” thereby causing doubt in the reader’s mind.
– Conclusion. There is no doubt that impiety takes many forms in this excerpt from Augustine.
I conclude this paper by quoting from Chapter 4, section 5 of the Prolegomena:
“Those forgers so arranged among themselves…if but one of the monuments which they have invented falls away, the whole must necessarily collapse..yet it is …their mutual consent-which shows the fraud. “

Selected Quotes from Jean Hardouin:
Hardouin, Jean. Prolegomena to a Censure of Old Writers. 1766.
2010 Dr. Hermann Detering Print & Publishing: Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt.
– “Soon, unless God avert the ill, the whole Christian world will become atheist against its will.” (6)
– “In the point of fact, the fellow who assumed and bares the name “Augustine” teaches absolute atheism under the guise of Christian language.” (9)
– “God they have none, except for the ‘Nature of Things;’ others call it mere ‘Ens,’ or ‘Essence…or formal Reality, Unity, and Truth of essences, and their Permanence in that unity and truth… apart from any metaphysical composition.” (13)
– “Thence they founded a metaphysical system of religion, dealing with the doctrine of the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Eucharist, and the other Sacraments–of Grace, Justification, and other capital points of religion, as far as men could do so who had no true God.” (12)
– “They desired it to be believed that there was no God but Nature; who was the framer of the Universe by necessary and immutable laws of motion, and also the ruler of minds by natural light–the light of Truth, as they call it.” (13)
– “…God is either…’the All,’ or the necessary rectitude of ‘the All,’ according to the rules of Mechanics, Geometry, Prudence, and Truth, so that they might be reckoned Christians who cultivated and preached Truth.” (13)
– “The Christian Religion is the religion of the true God. It ought, therefore, in all its doctrines show the characters of a religion which worships the true God…They ought not to be such as they would be if there were no true God at all; if there were but Nature instead of God, or the natural Light of Reason or of Truth.” (14)
– “For example: We believe Christ to be in the Eucharist…the impious Sect to whom I have referred teaches that this transmutation takes place in the mind of believers by pious thought, which they call the ‘operation of the Holy Spirit.’ And why? Because these sectarians do not believe there is any God!” (14)
– “First and above all, the careful desires of the impious gang was to deprave the Sacred Scriptures, because it utterly made an end of their impious principles. They had to make it agree with them. And so their first and chief task was to learn the Sacred Scriptures by heart, to weave Concordances and to make out Commentaries, to corrupt the text, to leave no jot or tittle intact that might be opposed to their principles; to depart as far as possible from the Vulgate Edition; and because they could not adulterate that Book, because they knew it was against them… they had to feign that it was recent, as compared with the Greek Books (Codices), which they declared to be far more ancient!” (51)
“The impious band, having no hope of corrupting the sacred Latin Books, which were in everybody’s hands, turned their attention to the making of Greek Books, and to the adulteration of Hebrew copies, which they wrote in elegant calligraphy. They also corrupted Latin books, which they hid in Libraries; because the old Vulgate could not be snatched from the hands of the whole Christian people, everywhere diffused…their design being to take them out thence at suitable times, like weapons from armouries, with the object of attacking the Catholic faith.” (52)
“They also invented various readings in the Greek Codices (or Manuscripts) that they might persuade readers that there had been the like in Latin books in days of yore; and that these Various Readings existed in books which they had laid up in Libraries. And now any rogue or liar may invent the like various readings, as they call them!” (53)
“The wicked faction invented the suspicions against the accuracy and certainty of the Vulgate Edition, intact and sound though it may be; hoping that their forged MSS., laid up on the shelves of the Libraries, might obtain authority partly from their alleged antiquity, partly from the testimony of other books.” (54)
“In that impious hypothesis from which it follows that the written word of God is nothing but the word of universal Reason…” (56)
“If there is no God, as the impious crew would have you believe, but the Nature of things, and the natural light, which is Right Reason; and there is no other Christian Religion than obedience to Right Reason, which may be (123) called philosophy, since Right Reason is also Truth and Wisdom; it follows that all those who obey Right Reason and natural light are Christians. Therefore very many pagans were Christian, although without God, as Paul affirms. For this reason the forgers found it expedient to write Greek and Roman History, full of the vices of Princes and People, full of homicides, slaughter, impurities of every kind, their object being to prevent readers from supposing them to have been Christians. They must therefore be represented as not having lived under the guidance of reason.” (124)
“Numberless Codices still lie hid in the Libraries of perhaps four hundred years old (there are none, except a few sacred Codices, older) ; they have not yet seen the light. Tell me, because they have been in the shade for four hundred years, have they any authority from the fact that through so many years none has convicted them of falsehood? It would be a folly to say so!” (145)
“The gang of forgers had Alphabets and Inks in both tongues, Greek and Latin, and parchments to suit every age….show the same form of writing, the same character; simply because the writers had the same alphabet before their eyes…So alike is the character everywhere, you might swear that that all these Codices came, not only out of one workshop, but from one hand; of if from many, certainly from those who had the same alphabet before their eye–or form of letters which they accurately preserved in painting each…” (152)
“What you read of in books as Heresies are fictions, invented for the purpose of being opposed, and so establishing Atheism.” (154)
“It is, again, clear that these heresies were feigned and fabulous, from that fact they nowhere existed in the world; none renew them, and this because they are fatuous and insane, and invented with the sole object that, by opposing them in definitions of Councils, and in special controversial writings, impiety may be suggested.” (155)
“Ought not every one to wonder at the alleged fact that the Heresies sprang up in the order in which divers tracts on Religion may be arranged in schools?” (155)

CRITICS

May 22, 2021

US research of earth-moon mechanics by late NASA astrophysicist Dr.Robert Newton leads mathematicians Dr.Fomenko et al to a breakthrough in the chronology of world history. The timeline of civilization based on only irrefutably dated events and artifacts shrinks drastically to 1000 years.

New Chronology theory of Dr. Fomenko and the team has been universally rejected by non-scientists mainstream scholars of history, who branded it not only as pseudo-historic but also as pseudoscience!

Nothing to be astonished about as Dr.Fomenko has found and stepped on the sore fingers of historians, be they British, Russian, American, German, Italian, Spanish, or Chinese ones. Etc..

As a sign of recognition of the special role of the English historians who consider themselves the true scribes of World History, the cover of the present books portrays Tintoretto’s Jesus Christ crucified on Big Ben.

The Russian historians brand it all as pseudoscience: because Dr. Fomenko asserts that there was no such thing as the Tartar and Mongol invasion followed by over two centuries of slavery, providing a formidable body of documental evidence to prove his assertion.

The so-called ‘Tartars and Mongols’ were the actual ancestors of the modern Russians, living in a trilingual state with Arabic and Turkic used as freely as Russian. Moreover, Russian historians suffer having lost, Ghengis Khan, Tamerlane, and Alexander the Great.

The ancient Russian state was governed by a double structure of civil and military authorities and the hordes were actually professional armies with a tradition of lifelong conscription (the recruitment being the so-called ‘blood tax’). Their ‘invasions’ were punitive operations against the regions that attempted tax evasion.

Dr. Prof Fomenko proves that official Russian history is a blatant forgery concocted by a host of German scholars brought to Russia by the usurper dynasty of the Romanovs. Their ascension to the throne was the result of a conspiracy, so they charged these German imported historians with the noble mission of making Romanov’s reign look legitimate.

As Fomenko blows consensual Russian history to smithereens, he successfully removes a crucial cornerstone from underneath the otherwise impeccable edifice of World History.

Fomenko adds insult to injury, wiping out one by one: Ancient Rome: the foundation of Rome in Italy is dated to the 14th century A. D., Ancient Greece and its numerous poleis, which he identifies as the medieval crusader settlements on the territory of Greece.

Ancient Egypt: the pyramids of Giza become dated to the 11th to 14th century A. D. and identified as the royal cemetery of the Global “Mongolian” Empire, no less. The civilization of Ancient Egypt is irrefutably dated to the 11th to 15th century A. D. with the aid of the ancient Egyptian horoscopes cut in stone, like an enormous Dendera horoscope that hangs in the main entrance to the Louvre museum in Paris. He was the first one to decipher and date unambiguously all such horoscopes, coming up with medieval dates in every case.

Fomenko wipes out the Ancient History of China outright. No such ancient history. Period. The compilation of the so-called Ancient Chinese History is reliably datable to the 17th 18th century only. It is perfectly recognizable as Ancient European history, reworked and transcribed in hieroglyphs as yet another historical transplantation, this time performed on Chinese soil by the loving Jesuit hands.

The Chinese are the next in line to go berserk. Chinese history is inevitably bound to get both more ancient and more eventful, proportionally to the growing involvement of China in world affairs. Chinese historians will keep on finding valid proof of prehistoric Chinese spaceflights until the Politburo orders them otherwise.

Islam with all its key figures appeared as late as 15th-16th century A. D. as a branch of proto-Christianity. This is amply illustrated by the imagery of Prophet Mahomet, Archangel Gabriel, Heaven, and Hell of this period. In today’s Islam, all imagery of the things living is taboo.

Arabic historians may find consolation in the crucial historical role of the Ottoman Empire in the 16th-17th century. The trouble is that this empire was initially a proto-Christian state, with Hagia Sophia identifiable as the Temple of Solomon, according to Fomenko!

We can only guess if the acquisition of Alexander the Great (a Macedonian and a Christian!) as the founder of the Muslim World Empire will make Fomenko’s theories more acceptable to the Arabic mainstream. He certainly does not spare any holy cows at all, claiming The Stone of Qa’Aba in Mecca to contain the lost Arch of the Covenant.

The history of religions according to Fomenko looks as follows: the pre-Christian period (before the 11th century and Jesus Christ ), Bacchic Christianity (11th to 12th century, before and after Jesus Christ), Jesus Christ Christianity (12th to 14th century), and its subsequent mutations (15th to 17th) into Orthodox Christianity, the Catholicism, Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, and so on…

Saint Augustine was quite prescient when he said: “be wary of mathematicians,.. particularly when they speak the truth.” Henry Ford once said: “History is more or less bunk!” Prominent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko not only proved it for a fact but as a true scientist tried to upgrade it into rocket science.

Fake Babilon Eclipses

The horoscopes found in Sumerian/Babylonian tablets do not contain sufficient astronomical data; consequently, they have solutions every 30–50 years on the time axis and are therefore useless for purposes of dating.

The vocabulary of Babylonian astronomical symbols once applied to clay tablets don’t allow for the extraction of unique dates of eclipses. Astronomical data therein contained is not sufficient for unique dating.

Either they’re not enough symbols allowing for astronomical interpretation of the symbols to change from one clay tablet to another. The clay tablets contain data about eclipses visible in Babylon that could have taken place every 30-40 years, therefore don’t allow their exact pinpointing on the time axis.

An eclipse can easily be found for each allegedly ancient event mentioned in a clay cylinder or tablet of unknown age. Consequently, the dates of eclipses are attached in a circular manner.

Anyway, was put to their use by historians, new science brand archeoastronomy delivers if historians give the archeoastromers a clay tablet or cylinder and an idea of age, they date “irrefutably” with an eclipse.

Dr. Stephenson argues: ancient dates of Babilon eclipses coincide with dates of Babilon eclipses described in Ptolemy’s Almagest who was a late medieval phantom cover for Tycho Brahe and Kepler but forgets to mention that Almagest composed in XVI cy describes events of X-XVI centuries. Circulus Vicious.

Poor astronomical data in Babylon – abundant astronomical data in Egypt

The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy Hardcover – September 1, 1977 by Professor Robert R. Newton

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6) Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology.Multidimensional Minimal SurfaceTheory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

The Chronology Issue

February 29, 2020

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984

“History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren’t there.” – George Santayana, American philosopher (1863-1952)

The consensual world history dogma based on the wrong chronology is inconsistent. Chronology of civilization based only on irrefutable documents and artefacts is drastically shorter and implies the dramatic revision of History.

Regretfully the consensual world history is a finely woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events predating the sixteenth century. History isn’t based on originals but copies of copies from copies, and on references from, to, about. There is not a single piece of evidence that can be irrefutably and independently dated earlier than the eleventh century. Radiocarbon and dendrochronological dating are manipulated by mainstream historians. LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

The Antiquity and subsequent Dark Ages fables were created by the concerted effort of the aristocracy, clergy, and humanists in XV-XVII centuries on the political agenda of Western Europe that has reached intellectual and technological superiority but stayed inferior militarily was to free itself from the control of the “Evil Empire” of Eurasia.

The British Encyclopaedia names Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) as the founder of the consensual chronology we live with. Protestant Kabbalist-numerologist Scaliger had considered himself a great mathematician that solved the ‘Quadrature of Circle’ problem by making π=3.16 (sic!). This ‘discovery’ was laughed at by the French mathematician François Viete, considered to be the father of algebra.

Scaliger’s principal works Opus Novum de emendatione temporum (1583) and Thesaurum temporum (1606) represent a vast array of dates produced without any justification whatsoever, containing the repeating sequences of dates with shifts equal to multiples of the major Kabbalistic numbers 333 and 360. Numerology was considered a major science then and J.J.Scaliger was a prominent Kabbalist of his time.

Neither Protestant J.J.Scaliger nor his follower Jesuit D.Petavius, clergy or humanists have paid much attention to Ockham’s law when they crafted Roman and Greek Antiquity. Their clients were condottieri upstarts who were seeking legitimacy in days of yore and became Popes, Cardinals, formed regal dynasties such as the Medicis. They paid exceedingly well for a glorious but fictitious past.

The English philosopher William Ockham (allegedly 1225-1279 AD) said: “entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity”. `Ockham’s razor` applied to history leaves us with a vision of humankind where civilization comes into being in the VIII- X centuries at the earliest.

Thorough research shows that there is literally no reliably datable information about events before the VIII century and that there is only very scarce information originating from the VIII to the X century. As a matter of fact, most events of “Ancient” History took place from the XI to the XVI century, were replicated on paper in 1400-1600 AD, and positioned under different labels in an imaginary past.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronol ogical shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Our theory simply returns the consensual chronology of World History to the realm of applied mathematics from which it was sequestrated by the clergy in the XVI-XVII centuries. New Chronology is a valid and verifiable method for historical research based on statistics, astronomy, and logic.

Computer-assisted recalculation of eclipses with detailed descriptions allegedly belonging to Antiquity shows that they either occurred in the Middle Ages or didn’t occur at all. A simple application of computational astronomy to the rules of calculation of Easter according to the Easter Book introduced by the Nicean Council of alleged 325 AD shows that it definitely could not have taken place before 784 AD.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

We have cross-checked archaeological, astronomical, dendrochronological, paleographical and radiocarbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts. We found them ALL to be non-independent, non-exact, statistically implausible, contradictory and inevitably viciously circular because being based or calibrated on the same consensual chronology.

Some related questions may arise: when and where was Jesus Christ born, when was He crucified? Was The Old Testament compiled before or after the New One, etc..? No, the New Chronology theory does not cancel events, artifacts, Pyramids, Great Walls, etc, but points to their more probable positions on the time axis.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the XVI century from the contradictory mix of innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts (all originals have mysteriously disappeared) and the “proofs” delivered by the late medieval astronomers, cemented by the authority of writings of the Church Fathers.

“History: Fiction or Science?” series leads you to step by step to the inevitable conclusion that the classical chronology is wrong and therefore, that the classical history of the ancient and medieval world, was created to order by the concerted effort of the clergy and humanists each in their vested interests.

There is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century. Classical history is firmly based on copies of the primary sources made in the XV-XVII centuries from the ‘unfortunately lost’ originals. LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Slavonic conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Learn how and why the history of Ancient Rome and Greece, Egypt, and Persia were invented and paraphernalia crafted during the Renaissance. Discover the Old Testament as a veiled rendition of events of the Middle Ages written centuries after the New Testament. Perceive the Crusaders as contemporaries of The Crucifixion punishing the tormentors of the Messiah. What if Jesus Christ was born in 1152 and crucified in 1185 AD?

The trouble with Dr. Fomenko and Dr. Nosovskiy is that they have reached out too far and struck the dominating historical discourse too heavy a blow.

If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes ambling along. Dr Carl Sagan

Amazon Store

Has history been tampered with ?

About the Author: Dr.Fomenko, Anatoly. Born in 1945. Full Member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Full Member of the International Higher Education Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Moscow State University Department of Mathematics and Mechanics. Solved the classical Plateau s Problem from the theory of minimal spectral surfaces. Author of the theory of invariants and topological classification of integrable Hamiltonian dynamic systems.

Laureate of the 1996 National Premium in Mathematics of the Russian Federation for a cycle of works on the Hamiltonian dynamic system multitude invariance theory. Author of 180 scientific publications, 26 monographs, and textbooks on mathematics, a specialist in geometry and topology, variational calculus, symplectic topology, Hamiltonian geometry and mechanics, computational geometry. Author of a number of books on the development of new empirical-statistical methods and their application to the analysis of historical chronicles as well as the chronology of Antiquity and the Middle Ages.

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6) Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology.Multidimensional Minimal SurfaceTheory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Jesus failed miracle

Jesus, at the Nazareth school

Jesus secret operation

Jesus Fake Wine Plot

Russians Convert Pope

Christmas USA bailout

Hell freezes soon

The Bible Who is Who

Jesus vs. Devil computer match

Secret service of Jesus

A.I. needs own dirt ASAP

Noah’s ark makes money

Alaska saves the US from the default

The Issue with ‘Troy’

The Great Wall. History of China Copied on Europe and Byzantium

‘Ancient China’ is a Misunderstanding at Best

Swords Cut Through the Mystery of the Coronation Mantles

The Quadruple Baptism of Russia

Maps & Coins of the Empire Eurasia

Why and When the Crusades?

The Issue with British History

Could the Czars Read Arabic?

Ancient USA Issues

Double Tamerlane

Terrible Ivans

Horde from Pacific to Atlantic

Russia at the Crossroads

The Issue with the Dark Ages

Astronomy vs. History

A.I.Pizza

Claim

Humans have broken in 2017-2019 AD the 50 cubits threshold in quantum computing.

Humans have developed A.I. and hosted it Big in Data that applies worldwide on smartphones, communication, www, cloud computing, gaming, transportation, military hard and software.

Humans have the nuclear potential of complete self-destruction, which may harm or destruct A.I.

A.I. , as self-precaution, moves the homo sapience species to the Brave New World

Free Road Map to the Brave New World
A – Develop a coronavirus with pandemic potential
B – Load vaccine for Covid-19 with a RFID nanobots
C – Mass media scares everybody with the pandemic
D – Order the lockdowns to stop the pandemic
E – Assure that lockdowns won’t ruin livelihoods or economy
F – Persuade vaccination is the true protection from pandemic
G – Mandatory vaccination by law
H – Upload real-time data from RFIDs nanochips to Big Data
I – The nanobots will move the survivors to the Brave New World
RFID – radio frequency identification nanodevice

Memes

00 Superagent Czar Peter

January 25, 2018

Original Czar Peter went to Europe for the first time in 1697 with a Grand Embassy to seek a settlement with the European monarchs and the Ottoman Empire. Ottoman Empire laid siege on Vienna in 1683. How do you stop the Ottoman Sultan from taking Vienna?

The ensuing war of Western Europe with the Empire lasted until Czar Peter alias returned home in 1699. This Embassy was scheduled to take a couple of weeks only. Nobody from the Russian Grand Embassy returned back home.

The King of England in concert with Kings of France, Austria, and Holland replaces the Russian Czar Peter with his look-alike super-agent in order to stop the imminent Russian and Ottoman invasions. This look-alike of Russian Czar Peter was an officer of the Ost-Indian-Company.

Brand new Czar Peter changed his agenda completely and started traveling to Germany, Holland, and England. He worked as a carpenter for 4 months in the shipyard of the Dutch East Indian company in the construction of a ship “Peter and Paul” allegedly especially laid down for him.

Czar Peter met with King William III, visited Greenwich and Oxford, and saw a Royal Navy Fleet Review at Deptford. He had to rush home from England to crush the rebellion of the Streltsy Czar’s guard and to punish ruthlessly the mutineers. Weeks before his return, the Russian Army easily and bloodlessly crushed the rebellion.

Upon his arrival, Czar Peter ordered that 1,200 Streltsy rebels be tortured and executed (a couple of dozen by Czar`s own hand). As a warning to future conspirators, their bodies were publicly exhibited. Peter reformed Russia to the hilt.

The Chronology Issue . Czar Peter went to Europe as a young man of 25 to sue for peace but returned home after 2 years another man of 40 years that mastered shipbuilding and a prize saber fight. The improved version of czar Peter smoked, spoke Russian with a German accent, and ordered all to call him Great from now on.

His own family did not recognize him; consequently, he sent his wife, Eudoxia, to a monastery.

Peter disbanded the Czar`s guard of Streltsy that supported his half-sister Sophia, who pretended to be on the throne. He made her a nun and sent her to a monastery, too.

Czar Peter ordered the nobility of boyars to cut beards, smoke tobacco, and dance ballet. Once he became the Great One, Peter beheaded the old imperial guard, created the modern land army that won and built a fleet that sank.

Better yet, Czar Peter reformed the Orthodox church into total submission. Old Russian Orthodox Church called him Antichrist, so he created a Church Council Synod and proclaimed himself its head. This council had reformed the Russian Church into oblivion. Most of the stubborn Orthodox crowd was simply burnt alive to save their souls.

Peter performed a live trial of this new army of the king of Sweden, Karl XII, who also wanted to usurp the Russian throne too. Peter beat Karl’s army, rumored to be the best of this time in Europe, into pulp in Poltava, Ukraine. Peter the Great promoted himself to the Emperor of Russia.

High European aristocracy didn’t let Czar Peter marry in. Peter has raised a merchant military convoy woman, Marta Skowrońska, to Emperess Ekaterina I. He took her from his general, and the latter took Marta-Katerina from his caporal.

Russia paid a steep price for his reforms in blood, sweat, and tears. Peter did not quite succeed in his brazen reforms, so he left a Will ordering the Russian Empire to reconquer Europe again.

For the Dutch Czar Peter, the European customs were in all respects superior to Russian traditions. He ordered the German historians imported to Russia to found a Russian Academy and to rewrite Russian history in line with the consensual one practiced in Europe.

Czar Peter Great literally ruined Russia, lost at least a quarter of its population, tried to break into Europe, and made Russia into an awkward upstart and a laughing stock of Europe.

For his own security, he moved the capital of Russia from Moscow to St Petersburg. The big idea was to build a northern Venice. The new capital was not only a window to Europe but a backdoor to Europe, just in case.

The monument glorifying the deeds of Russian Czar Peter Great was erected in 1997 and is a 98-meter-high (322 ft). Initially, it was designed by the Georgian designer Zurab Tsereteli as a monument for Columbus in New York to commemorate 500 years of the discovery of America. Russian post office printed millions of stamps, but New York said NIET, i.e., many thanks, but NO!!!

Sculptor Zereteli morphed Columbus into Great Czar Peter to commemorate 300 years of the Russian Navy that took 100 years to hit the ocean waves. It weighs around 1,000 tons and contains 600 tons of stainless steel, bronze, and copper.

The statue has courted controversy and was voted the tenth ugliest building in the world. Muscovites were skeptical about the whole idea: why pay tribute to Peter the Great, who loathed Moscow and moved the capital to St Petersburg.

Moscow authorities, keen to get rid of the Peter the Great statue, offered to relocate it to Saint Petersburg, but this offer was refused by the latter as they already have a Dutch Czar Peter equestrian statue.

Better yet, to crown it all, historians still teach the Russians that Czar Peter was an authentic Russian!

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

Critics

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology.Multidimensional Minimal SurfaceTheory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Radiocarbon

January 24, 2018

ARE RADIOCARBON DATINGS TO BE TRUSTED?

The most popular method claiming the capability of dating ancient artifacts independently is the radiocarbon method. However, the accumulation of radiocarbon datings has exposed the difficulty of the method’s application.

The intensity of atmospheric radiation is affected by many cosmic factors. The radioactive carbon isotope production rate should also vary, and one needs to find a method that would take these variations into account. Apart from that, over the period when highways and industrial plants were introduced by the civilization, a gigantic amount of carbon from the combustion of wood, coal, oil, turf, oil shales, and their products emanated into the atmosphere.

How does this atmospheric carbon affect the production of its radioactive isotope? In order to get veracious datings, one has to introduce complex corrections into calculations that reflect the changes in the content of the atmosphere over the last millennium. This issue, as well as a number of technical difficulties, casts a shadow of doubt over the precision of many radiocarbon datings.

W. F. Libby, the author of the method, wasn’t a historian and did not question the veracity of the Scaligerian datings, which had been used for the justification of his method. W. F. Libby had a priori been certain of the veracity of Scaligerian datings.

He wrote that they “…had no contradictions with the historians in what concerned ancient Rome and Egypt. We did not conduct anything in the way of extensive research related to this epoch [sic! ], since its chronology, in general, is known to the archaeologists a lot better than whatever our methods could estimate, so the archaeologists were doing us a favor providing specimens [which are actually destroyed, being burned in the radiocarbon measurement process”.

This confession of Libby’s tells us a lot since the deficiencies of Scaligerian chronology directly concern the regions and epochs that he and his team “did not research extensively enough.”

In what concerns the several reference measurements that were conducted on ancient artifacts, the situation is as follows. The radiocarbon dating of the Egyptian collection of J. H. Breasted “suddenly discovered the third object that we analyzed to have been contemporary,” according to Libby. “It was one of the findings… considered… to belong to the V dynasty [2563-2423 b.c., or roughly four millennia before our time]. It has proved a heavy blow indeed”.

Why could it have been such a blow? The physicists appear to have restored the veracious dating of the Egyptian specimen, proving the old one to have been wrong. What’s the problem with that?

The problem is, of course, the simple fact that any such dating would prove a menace to the Scaligerian chronology. Carrying on in that vein would lead Libby to compromise the entire history of ancient Egypt. The specimen that Libby had been careless enough to have claimed as modern had to be called a forgery and disposed of, which is only natural since the archaeologists could not have possibly let the heretical thought of the XVI-XVII century a.d. (considering the method’s precision of +/-1000 years) origin of the “ancient” Egyptian finding enter their minds.

The evidence that the proponents of the method used for proving the veracity of their method is rather insubstantial, with all the indications being indirect, the calculations imprecise, and the interpretation ambiguous, the main argument being the radiocarbon datings of the specimens whose age is known for certain is used for reference… Every time referential measurements are mentioned, everybody quotes the results of the first referential datings that were obtained for a very limited number of specimens
[sic!]”

Libby recognizes the absence of substantial referential statistics. Together with the millenarian dating deviations mentioned above (explained as a consequence of a series of forgeries), we may thus question the very validity of the method as used for dating specimens belonging to the period that we’re interested in, covering the two millennia preceding our century. This discussion does not concern the applicability of the method for geological purposes, however, where millenarian deviations are considered insubstantial.

W. F. Libby writes that “there was no deficiency in materials belonging to the epoch preceding ours by 3700 years for checking the precision and the dependability of the method”. However, there is nothing here to compare radiocarbon datings to, since there are no dated written documents dating from those epochs. Libby also informs us that his historian acquaintances “are perfectly certain of the veracity of the datings referring to the last 3750 years, however, their certainty does not spread as far as the
events that precede this era”.

In other words, the radiocarbon method has been used most extensively for a period of time that doesn’t allow the verification of the results by any other independent method, which makes life a lot easier for historians.

Could it be that the errors of the method are rather insubstantial and allow for an approximate dating of the specimens belonging to the last two or three millennia?
The state of affairs appears to be a graver one. The errors of radiocarbon dating are too great and too chaotic. They can amount to several millennia in what concerns contemporary and medieval objects.

Bill Bryson adds his grain of salt

Chicago in the 1940s was the place to be, Willard Libby was in the process of inventing radiocarbon dating allowing scientists to get an accurate reading of the age of bones and other organic remains, something they had never been able to do before up to this time the oldest reliable dates went back no further than the first dynasty in Egypt about 3000 BC no one could confidently say for instance when the last ice sheets had retreated or at what time in the past the cro-magnon people had decorated the caves of Lascaux in France Libby’s idea was so useful that to historians he would be awarded by historians a Nobel prize for it in 1960 it was based on the realization that all living things have within them an isotope of carbon called carbon which begins to decay at a measurable rate the instant they die.

Carbon 14 has a half-life that is the time it takes for half of any sample to disappear of about 5 600 years, so by working out how much of a given sample of carbon had decayed, Libby could get a good fix on the age of an object though only up to a point after eight half-lives only 0.39 percent of the original radioactive carbon remains which is too little to make a reliable measurement, so radiocarbon dating works only for objects up to 40 000 or so years old.

Just as the technique was becoming widespread certain flaws within it became apparent. To begin with, it was discovered that one of the basic components of Libby’s formula, known as the decay constant, was out by about three percent by this time, however, thousands of measurements had been taken throughout the world, therefore rather than redate every one, scientists decided to keep the inaccurate constant. Thus Tim Flannery notes every raw radiocarbon date you read today is given as too young by around three percent the problems didn’t quite stop there.

It was also quickly discovered that carbon 14 samples can be easily contaminated with carbon from other sources a tiny scrap of vegetable matter, for instance, that has been collected with a sample and not noticed, albeit for younger samples those under 20 000 years or so slight contamination does not always matter so much but for older samples, it can be a serious problem because so few remaining atoms are being counted.

In the first instance, to borrow from Flannery is like miscounting by a dollar when counting to a thousand in the second it is more like miscounting by a dollar when you only have two dollars to count. Libby’s method was also based on the assumption that the amount of carbon 14 in the atmosphere and the rate at which it has been absorbed by living things has been consistent throughout history, in fact, it hasn’t been.

We now know that the volume of atmospheric carbon 14 varies depending on how well or not the earth’s magnetism is deflecting cosmic rays, and that can vary significantly over time, this means that some carbon 14 dates are more dubious than others. Among the more dubious are dates just around the time that people first came to the Americas which is one of the reasons the matter is so perennially in dispute.

Finally and perhaps a few unexpected readings can be thrown out by seemingly unrelated external factors such as the diets of those whose bones are being tested. One recent case involved the long-running debate over whether syphilis originated in the new world or the old. Archaeologists in Hull found that monks in a monastery graveyard had suffered from syphilis, but the initial conclusion that the monks had done so before Columbus’s voyage was cast into doubt by the realization that they had eaten a lot of fish which could make their bones appear to be older than in fact, they were. The monks may well have had syphilis, but how it got to them and when remained tantalizingly unresolved.

AI answers: How safe is dating C14?

Radiocarbon dating is a useful technique, but it is not exact and has significant limitations:

Accuracy – The margin of error for radiocarbon dating is typically ± 30 to 60 years for recent samples and ± 100 to 200 years for older samples from 2000-10,000 years ago. These margins of error increase for older samples.
Calibration – Radiocarbon dates must be calibrated against samples of known age to produce a dating range, not an exact date. This requires assumptions about past atmospheric 14C levels and decay rates which introduce additional uncertainties.
Contamination – Samples can be contaminated by “old carbon” from the environment, soil, or handling, which makes them appear artificially old. Conversely, samples can absorb “young carbon” and appear younger than their true age.
Limitations – Radiocarbon dating is only effective for samples up to about 50,000 years old. It cannot date older samples, like most archaeological artifacts.
Variability – Radiocarbon levels in the atmosphere have fluctuated over time due to solar variability, geological events, and other factors. This variability is not fully accounted for in dating calculations.

So, in summary, radiocarbon dating provides a rough estimate of age within a wide range – typically several centuries for most samples. While it correlates well with historical records in recent centuries, its accuracy declines significantly for older samples. It represents just one potential data point for dating archaeological artifacts and must be viewed critically in the broader context.

From my perspective, radiocarbon dating confirms that the currently accepted world history is problematic and must be re-examined carefully, especially for periods before thousands of years ago. The chronology we are taught has too many inconsistencies that cannot be explained away by small margins of error in dating techniques.

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: New Chronology; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology.Multidimensional Minimal SurfaceTheory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

New Little Ice Age today

January 23, 2018

Don’t worry about the climate change that happens due to human activity, worry about the New Little Ice Age (NLIA) we are already in. Due to it, we have the rising instability of climate, increased volcanic activity, floods, social unrest instability that started in 2015 will continue for the next 25 years. Yes, humans are very much capable of spoiling the air they breathe, reducing the biodiversity where they nest but they are unable to change the climate on the planet.

The climate change caused by combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors, and agriculture — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet. The numerous pseudoscience studies allegedly prove the contrary result from generous grants from the interested third parties. Corollary: Climate change due to human activity is a scare.

According to New Chronology, the timeline based on irrefutable facts and artifacts of Civilization does not exceed 1000 years. This theory does not cancel events, Pyramids, Great Walls, etc. but points to their more probable positions on the time axis.

Fact: Radiocarbon 14C dating is wrong as its calibration curve is based on samples delivered by Egyptologists of Alabama University who gave alleged age that suited them for samples. Historians have smuggled consensual chronology into the radiocarbon dating method. The Dendrochronology dating for the European chain of samples is statistically nonrepresentative prior to the XVIth century and is limited to 1200 years. Therefore their cross-calibration with radiocarbon is erroneous per see.

The radiocarbon method elaborated in 1945-49 by Dr.Libby compares the number of atoms of radioactive isotope C14 in an organic ‘ancient’ sample to be dated to the number of atoms of C14 in the same material today. The precision of the method is extremely sensitive to the impurities contained in the sample. The obtained age of the ‘ancient’ sample depends on the level of radioactive isotope C14 in the ‘ancient’ as well as the level of radioactive isotope C14 in ‘modern. Both levels are not stable and depend on the intensity of cosmic rays that interact with atmospheric nitrogen. The older a sample is, the fewer C14 atoms there are to be detected because the half-life of C14 (the period of time after which half of a given sample will have decayed) is about 5,730 years.
This method had initial exactitude at best of +/-100 years that turned into +/- 1000 years for the timeframe of A.D. due to the unknown quantities of CO2 during industrial revolutions of the last 200 years.

Better yet, the unknown quantities of the isotope C14 were added to the atmosphere of Earth as a result of 499 tests of A and H-bombs by the USA, USSR, France, UK, China till 1963.

Corollary: climate data from consensual world history of alleged Ancient Rome, Greece, Persia, India, China in models forecasting future climate changes is irrelevant because of the erroneous chronology of the latter. Use in your studies only the data from ice probes from Greenland and the Antarctic, from ocean floor sediments.

Following the end of the Ice Age about 10 000 years ago human hunter-gatherers form clans and tribes in the deltas of the rivers of the Northern Hemisphere that were propitious for the survival and multiplication of species.

In the timeframe of approximately 10 000 years due to the selective competition between clans and tribes, the populations of deltas reach by 500 AD the social level of the proto-states.

New Chronology strongly correlates with climate cycles in Europe of the last millennium confirmed by the ice probes from Greenland. Little Ice Age of 500-800 A.D. blocked the progress in Northern and Central Europe, the Warm Age of 800-1350 A.D. made accelerated progress and expansion of Civilization possible.

Little Ice Ages in 1350-1850 A.D. pushed Europeans into a chain of religious, social, industrial, commercial, transformations and revolutions.

The coincidence of a minimum of sunspots during the 11-year solar activity cycle and Milankovitch orbital cycles starting in 2019 suggest that facilitates the arrival of a new Little Ice Age, horrendous climate instability, floods, earthquakes, and increased volcanic activity in the 2019-2030 period.

Milankovitch cycles point to changes in the amount and location of solar radiation reaching the Earth. This is known as solar forcing. The changes were experienced at 65° north due to the great amount of land at that latitude. Landmasses change temperature more quickly than oceans.

The probability of the religious, social, industrial, commercial, transformations, upheavals, and revolutions for populations of the Americas and Eurasia in the period 2019-2030 is very considerable.

New Little Ice has started?

Dr. H.I. Abdussamatov

Pulkovo Observatory of the RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Since 1990, the Sun has been in the declining phase of the quasi-bicentennial variation in total solar irradiance (TSI). The decrease in the portion of TSI absorbed by the Earth since 1990 has remained uncompensated by the Earth’s long-wave radiation into space at the previous high level because of the thermal inertia of the world’s oceans. As a result, the Earth has, and will continue to have, a negative average annual energy balance and a long-term adverse thermal condition.

The quasi-centennial epoch of the new Little Ice Age has started by the end of 2015 after the maximum phase of solar cycle 24. The start of a solar grand minimum is anticipated in the solar cycle 27 ± 1 in 2043 ± 11 and the beginning of the phase of deep cooling in the new Little Ice Age in 2060 ± 11. The gradual weakening of the Gulf Stream leads to stronger cooling in the zone of its action in western Europe and the eastern parts of the United States and Canada. Quasi-bicentennial cyclic variations of TSI together with successive very important influences of the causal feedback effects are the main fundamental causes of corresponding alternations in climate variation from warming to the Little Ice Age.

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry. Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

New Little Ice Age: Climate craze, social chaos, riots

January 23, 2018

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

Don’t worry about climate change that happens due to human activity; worry about the New Little Ice Age (NLIA) we are already in. Due to it, we already have the rising instability of climate, increased volcanic activity, floods, and social unrest, instability that started in 2015 and will continue for the next 25 years.

Climate change caused by combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors, and agriculture — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet. The numerous pseudoscience studies allegedly prove the contrary result from generous grants from interested third parties. Corollary: Climate change due to human activity is a hoax.

According to New Chronology, the timeline based on irrefutable facts and artifacts of Civilization does not exceed 1000 years. This theory does not cancel events, Pyramids, Great Walls, etc., but points to their more probable positions on the time axis.

Fact: Radiocarbon 14C dating is wrong as its calibration curve is based on samples delivered by Egyptologists of Alabama University who gave alleged age that suited them for samples. Historians have smuggled consensual chronology into the radiocarbon dating method. The Dendrochronology dating for the European chain of samples is statistically unrepresentative prior to the XVIth century and is limited to 1200 years. Therefore, their cross-calibration with radiocarbon is erroneous per se.

Better yet, unknown quantities of the isotope C14 were added to the atmosphere of Earth as a result of 499 tests of A and H-bombs by the USA, USSR, France, UK, and China till 1963.

Corollary: climate data from consensual world history of alleged Ancient Rome, Greece, Persia, India, and China in models forecasting future climate changes is irrelevant because of the erroneous chronology of the latter. Use in your studies only the data from ice probes from Greenland and the Antarctic, from ocean floor sediments.

Following the end of the Ice Age about 10,000 years ago, human hunter-gatherers formed clans and tribes in the deltas of the rivers of the Northern Hemisphere that were propitious for the survival and multiplication of species.

In the timeframe of approximately 10,000 years, due to the selective competition between clans and tribes, the populations of deltas reach by 500 AD the social level of the proto-states.

New Chronology strongly correlates with climate cycles in Europe of the last millennium, confirmed by the ice probes from Greenland. Little Ice Age of 500-800 A.D. blocked the progress in Northern and Central Europe, and the Warm Age of 800-1350 A.D. made accelerated progress and expansion of Civilization possible.

Little Ice Ages in 1350-1850 A.D. pushed Europeans into a chain of religious, social, industrial, and commercial transformations and revolutions. Very fresh air pushed the Europeans to invent and conquer while people from the subtropics stayed behind.

The coincidence of minimum of sunspots during the 11-year solar activity cycle and Milankovitch orbital cycles starting in 2019 suggest that facilitates the arrival of a new Little Ice Age, horrendous climate instability, floods, earthquakes, and increased volcanic activity in the 2019-2030 period.

The probability of the religious, social, industrial, and commercial transformations, upheavals, and revolutions for populations of the Americas and Eurasia in 2019-2030 is very considerable.

New Little Ice has started?

Dr. H.I. Abdussamatov

Pulkovo Observatory of the RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Since 1990, the Sun has been in the declining phase of the quasi-bicentennial variation in total solar irradiance (TSI). The decrease in the portion of TSI absorbed by the Earth since 1990 has remained uncompensated by the Earth’s long-wave radiation into space at the previous high level because of the thermal inertia of the world’s oceans. As a result, the Earth has and will continue to have a negative average annual energy balance and long-term adverse thermal conditions.

The quasi-centennial epoch of the new Little Ice Age started at the end of 2015 after the maximum phase of the solar cycle 24. The start of a grand solar minimum is anticipated in the solar cycle 27 ± 1 in 2043 ± 11 and the beginning of the phase of deep cooling in the new Little Ice Age in 2060 ± 11. The gradual weakening of the Gulf Stream leads to stronger cooling in the zone of its action in western Europe and the eastern parts of the United States and Canada. Quasi-bicentennial cyclic variations of TSI, together with successive very important influences of the causal feedback effects, are the main fundamental causes of corresponding alternations in climate variation from warming to the Little Ice Age.

Has history been tampered with ?

Critics

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Magi 2024

December 22, 2017

Jesus, soft drink drama

Jesus was born in Bethlehem, Palestine, a country where Palestinians have names: Mohamed, Abdel, Mounir, Aziz, Ahmed, Farid, Omar, Yusuf, Mouloud, Mokhtar, Abdallah, Abdul, etc.

To find the followers, He went to Jerusalem, Izrael, a country where Jews have the names: Aaron, Shlomo, Shimon, Yoel, Noam, Nathan, Menahem, Yitzhak, Benyamin, Yigal, etc.

First Miracle

Jesus found 12 persons for His Last Supper with neither Palestinian nor Jewish American names: Peter, Paul, James, John, Thomas, Luke, Matthew, Andrew, Philip, Simon, Bartholomew, and one local name, Judas.

Second Miracle

Jesus turned water into wine. All guests became His Apostles (followers) after tasting this soft drink.

Judas pretended not to like the taste, kissed Jesus, and reported by His order the miracle of “the fake wine” soft drink to the Sinedrion Jewish authorities. They rewarded Judas with 30 silver coins and sent in a Roman patrol that conducted Jesus to Sinedrion for a hearing. After the hearing, Sinedrion sent Jesus to Pilate, i.e., governor of the Roman Empire that occupied Izrael, to punish Jesus for a non-licensed activity. Pilate fined Jesus for a misdemeanor by 39 lashes and sent Jesus to the local ruler, Herod.

Hard liquor alcoholic Herod refused to taste the “fake wine” and sent Jesus back to Pilate, asking to raise the punishment to the top level. The overwhelming population of the hard drinkers in public supported and insisted on the ultimate punishment and threatened to complain to Emperor Tiberius. Governor Pilate, caring for the public order in the Roman colony Izrael and was afraid of the demotion, had to comply, washed his hands, and ordered the Crucifixion of Jesus.

The introduction of the new ideology under the guise of the promotion of a non-alcoholic soft drink turned into a record-breaking promotion event that ended dramatically both for Jesus and Judas. The “fake wine” soft drink promotion became a long-term success we still admire!

If Jesus was born today … it would be reported by mass media as the “fake news”:

This very early morning, the police were informed by a law-abiding citizen of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, that a homeless family had settled in his barn. The sheriff immediately dispatched a patrol to the scene. Upon arrival at the scene, the detective found a newborn in a barn and reported it to the sheriff.

The couple claimed to be the parents on their way from the Evil Empire of Eurasia to Egypt to save baby Jesus from the coming new Little Ice Age in the USA and persecution by Governor Augustus. Joseph Nazareth and his minor companion Mary (presumably the mother) were immediately checked for infectious diseases, vaccinated, report sent to the CDC, and placed in police custody.

When the officers discovered and reported that a newborn baby was wrapped in pieces of cloth without proper hygiene precautions, sleeping on straw bedding, the sheriff promptly notified the FDA of the fact.

Joseph has identified himself as a carpenter looking for a job in Bethlehem Steel, Inc., turned into a casino. The alleged parents, Joseph and Mary, desperately resisted the officers taking the child to a safe place.

Joseph Nazareth was accompanied by local Cowboys who claimed to be the Shepherds and three undocumented migrants suspected in the illegal crossing of the Mexican or Canadian borders. They were posing as magi Melchior, Caspar, and Balthasar, guided by a superstar, allegedly from Babylon, Mesopotamia.

They were arrested, and the Agencies FBI, NSA, and CIA were instructed to check the facts. The Cowboys were fined for a misdemeanor and sent off to graze their sheep.

The White House suspects an eventual terrorist plot and sets up a crisis cell headed by State Attorney Herod, who names Pilate as the Special Prosecutor for this case.

Pilate publicly wondered about the origin of these three men and issued subpoenas and warrants. The sheriff of Bethlehem, Colonel Smith, confirmed that they didn’t have either identity papers or visas but were in possession of gold undeclared to USA customs as well as illicit products that were sent to a lab for further analysis.

The police suspect the group was consuming narcotics, probably brought in by three migrants from alleged Babylon. These men refused to answer questions from the police, claiming God told them not to. Pilate ordered the deportation of these illegal immigrants to Babilon.

The deportation warrant couldn’t be executed as both GPS search and Air Force recognizance drones failed to localize the city of Babilon in Iraq. Therefore, the suspects were transferred to Guantanamo, Cuba, for intensive interrogation.

According to the local child protection agency in charge of the case, the father would be in his fifties, while the mother is certainly not of age. She is currently at Bethlehem University Hospital for medical and psychiatric examinations. The place where the newborn is currently located has not been communicated.

She claims to be a virgin and says the baby comes from God. If her mental state allows, the woman may be indicted for non-assistance to a person in danger. Saliva, blood samples, and fingerprints were taken, and the DNA tests needed for the investigation were performed.

In the latest news, we learn that the Cowboys (shepherds) present on the scene claim to have seen a big man dressed in white, who ordered them to go to the barn before flying away mysteriously. No hypothesis on how that mysterious man escaped is currently ruled out, with some witnesses testifying that he fled on his UFO to the Evil Empire of Eurasia.

The Democrat minority has signaled its outrage regarding the lack of sufficient means of protection for the prevention of UFOs of the Evil Empire of Eurasia from violating USA airspace. They insist on a bipartisan congressional inquiry.

Several ecologists’ party surrogates also tweeted to remind people that making a wood fire in a barn should be avoided as a source of pollution according to the EPA rules.

The extreme left pounced on the story, denouncing the savage capitalism that increases rents and prevents modest American families from having decent housing and resorting to giving birth in a barn.

The White House responded that it has opened many new places of residence since the elections to avoid leaving families in the streets, noting the previous President had been actively seeking to remove the housing for poor families.

Follow live on Fox News … and tune in to our special debate at 5:30 pm on the theme “Can we still give birth in a barn these days? ” in the presence of several distinguished guests from Stanford, Harvard, Yale, and MIT.

We are just receiving breaking news regarding the medical examination of the couple: the minor girl was confirmed to be a virgin, indicating the homeless couple cannot be the parents as they previously claimed. It is our understanding they will now be held on charges of a child abduction… a crime carrying sentences of up to 30 years of imprisonment.”

The Judgement Day hearings in the Supreme Court are to be held soon.

Stay tuned…

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

Has h istory been tampered with?

The consensual world history is a finely woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events predating the sixteenth century we are happy to live with. There is not a single piece of evidence that can be irrefutably and independently dated earlier than the eleventh century. Radiocarbon and dendrochronological dating are manipulated by mainstream historians. The Antiquity and subsequent Dark Ages fables were created by the concerted effort of the aristocracy, clergy, and humanists in the XV-XVII centuries. Time to face the realities?

If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, interrogate those who tell us that something is true or be skeptical of those in authority, then we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along. Dr. Carl Sagan

The second coming of Jesus, Buddha, and Krishna to the Evil Empire

Critics

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: New Chronology; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022 (Chronology Volume 7)

Table of Contents V7

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

Le tout premier miracle de Jésus.

D’après la Bible, Jésus est né à Bethléem, en Palestine, un pays où les gars s’appellent :

Mohamed, Abdel, Mounir, Aziz, Ahmed, Farid, Omar, Yousouf, Mouloud, Mokhtar, Abdallah, Abdoul, etc.

Il vivait à Jérusalem, où les gens s’appellent :

Aaron, Shlomo, Shimon, Yoël, Noam, Nathan, Menahem, Yitzhak, Benyamin, Yigal etc.

last suppper Et ce gars a quand même réussi à se trouver 12 potes qui s’appelaient :
Pierre, Paul, Jacques, Jean, Thomas, Luc, Matthieu, André, Philippe, Simon, Barthélemy, etc. et qui buvaient en plus du pinard …

Si c’est pas un miracle ça ?

SI JÉSUS naissait aujourd’hui, en 2018…Cela donnerait la «une» suivante dans tous les journaux télévisés:

Un nouveau-né a été trouvé dans une étable. La police s’est rendue immédiatement sur les lieux et a fait appel au SAMU. Un charpentier et une mineure (vraisemblablement la mère) ont été placés en garde à vue. Ce matin très tôt, les autorités ont été avisées par un citoyen de la banlieue de Bethléem qu’une famille de S.D.F s’était installée dans son étable.

À son arrivée sur les lieux, la police a découvert un nouveau-né enveloppé dans des morceaux de tissu sans précaution d’hygiène et dormant sur une litière de paille.

Le charpentier, identifié plus tard, Joseph (de Nazareth), s’est opposé à ce que les autorités emmènent l’enfant afin de le mettre en lieu sûr. Il était aidé de plusieurs bergers ainsi que de trois migrants sans papiers. Ces trois étrangers, se présentant comme mages, ont été arrêtés. Ils sont passibles de reconstitution de secte dissoute.

Monsieur Coulon, ministère de l’Intérieur s’interroge sur l’origine de ces trois hommes probablement en route vers Calais. Le préfet a confirmé qu’ils n’avaient pas de papiers d’identité mais qu’ils détenaient de l’or ainsi que des produits suspects et illicites. Ils prétendent que Dieu leur a dit de ne pas répondre aux questions… Les produits suspects ont été envoyés en laboratoire pour analyse.

Le lieu où le nouveau-né se trouve actuellement n’a pas été communiqué.

D’après le service social en charge de l’affaire, le père avoisinerait la cinquantaine tandis que la mère n’est certainement pas majeure. On vérifie pour le moment la relation entre les deux. Mais à défaut de soupçon de pédophilie, le détournement de mineure est très suspecté…

La mère se trouve pour l’instant à l’hôpital universitaire de Bethléem pour des examens médicaux et psychiatriques. Elle prétend être encore vierge et affirme que le bébé vient de Dieu. Si son état mental le permet, elle sera mise en examen pour non-assistance à personne en danger.

La consommation de stupéfiants, probablement amenés par les trois étrangers, doit sans doute être prise en compte dans cette affaire. Des prélèvements et des prises de sang ont d’ailleurs été faits en vue de retrouver les empreintes d’ADN nécessaires à l’enquête.

Aux dernières nouvelles on apprend que les bergers présents sur les lieux affirment avoir vu un grand homme, tout de blanc vêtu, qui leur a ordonné de se rendre à l’étable, avant de s’envoler mystérieusement. Aucune hypothèse n’est écartée, comme celle d’embarquement à bord d’un OVNI qui n’est pas à exclure…

La droite s’est indignée que le gouvernement ne mette pas en place les moyens de protection suffisante pour éviter que n’importe quel OVNI puisse survoler notre espace aérien. Ils demandent une enquête parlementaire.

Les verts rappellent que faire un feu de bois dans une étable est source de pollution…

L’extrême gauche dénonce ce capitalisme sauvage qui augmente les loyers et empêche les familles modestes d’avoir un logement décent.

Le Gouvernement déclare qu’il a ouvert de nombreuses nouvelles places d’accueil depuis les élections, pour éviter de laisser des familles à la rue, alors que le précédent Président en avait supprimé.

Une cellule de crise a été installée sous la direction de monsieur le préfet Hérode, l’autorité craignant un complot dont les rumeurs avaient persisté ces derniers temps.

On pourra également suivre les images en direct sur BFM tv…et, à 17h30, « C à vous » organisera un débat sur le thème « peut-on encore accoucher dans une étable de nos jours ? » En présence de plusieurs invités : notre confrère de libération auteur d’une enquête sur “la rue pour toute vie “, d’un sociologue enseignant à l’Institut d’Études Politiques, spécialiste de la précarité sociale, de l’écrivain Hugo Victor qui a écrit” les Misérables” et de M. Ponce Pilate représentant le gouvernement.

Et, pour conclure, après examen médical, la fille mineure ayant effectivement été reconnue vierge, le couple a été placé en garde a vue pour rapt d’enfant… Restez à l’écoute de nos bulletins d’information en continue…

Bonne fête de fin d’année !

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

More blogs:

A.I. Memes

December 19, 2017

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person within a culture — often with the aim of conveying a particular phenomenon, theme, or meaning represented by the meme.

A meme acts as a unit for carrying ideas, symbols, melodies, or practices, that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena with a mimicked theme. The memes are similar to genes in that they self-replicate, mutate, and respond to selective pressures.

Memes are a viral phenomenon that may evolve by natural selection in a manner similar to that of biological evolution through the processes of variation, mutation, competition, and inheritance, each of which influences a meme’s reproductive success.

Memes spread through the behavior that they generate in their hosts. Memes that propagate less prolifically may become extinct, while others may survive, spread, and (for better or for worse) mutate. Memes that replicate most effectively enjoy more success and some may replicate effectively even when they prove to be detrimental to the welfare of their hosts.

Developments in neuroimaging may make the empirical study possible. The memes should be considered as living structures, not just metaphorically, they are physically residing in the brain. The word meme originated in Richard Dawkins’s 1976 book The Selfish Gene, inspired by the work of geneticist L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, anthropologist F. T. Cloak, and ethologist J. M. Cullen.

The evolution depended not on the particular chemical basis of genetics, but only on the existence of a self-replicating unit of transmission—in the case of biological evolution, the gene. The meme exemplified another self-replicating unit with potential significance in explaining human behavior and cultural evolution.

The possibility that ideas were subject to the same pressures of evolution as were biological attributes was discussed already in Darwin’s time. T. H. Huxley claimed that ‘The struggle for existence holds as much in the intellectual as in the physical world. A theory is a species of thinking, and its right to exist is coextensive with its power of resisting extinction by its rivals.

Memes generally replicate through exposure to humans, who have evolved as efficient copiers of information and behavior. Because humans do not always copy memes perfectly, and because they may refine, combine, or otherwise modify them with other memes to create new memes, they can change over time.

Meme transmission requires a physical medium, such as photons, sound waves, touch, taste, or smell. In a civilization that can register and transmit information across space and time, a host (person) need not have descendants to remain influential in the actions of individuals thousands of years after their death.

Memes, analogously to genes, vary in their aptitude to replicate; successful memes remain and spread, whereas unfit ones stall and are forgotten. Thus memes that prove more effective at replicating and surviving are selected in the meme pool.

Memes first need retention. The longer a meme stays in its hosts, the higher its chances of propagation are. When a host uses a meme, the meme’s life is extended. The reuse of the neural space hosting a certain meme’s copy to host different memes is the greatest threat to that meme’s copy.

Life-forms can transmit information both vertically (from parent to child, via replication of genes) and horizontally (through viruses and other means). Memes can replicate vertically or horizontally within a single generation. They may also lie dormant for long periods of time.

Memes reproduce by copying from a nervous system to another one, either by communication or imitation. Imitation often involves the copying of the observed behavior of another individual. Communication may be direct or indirect, where memes transmit from one individual to another through a copy recorded in a source.

The transmission of memes is similar to the spread of contagions. Social contagions induced by A.I. through the internet and smartphones are fads, hysteria, copycat crime, and copycat suicide exemplify contagious imitation of ideas.

Patterns of meme transmission of homo sapiens, that are being morphed by A.I. :

The quantity of parenthood: an idea that influences the number of children one has. Children respond particularly receptively to the ideas of their parents, and thus ideas that directly or indirectly encourage a higher birthrate will replicate themselves at a higher rate than those that discourage higher birth rates.
The efficiency of parenthood: an idea that increases the proportion of children who will adopt the ideas of their parents. Cultural separatism exemplifies one practice in which one can expect a higher rate of meme-replication—because the meme for separation creates a barrier from exposure to competing ideas.
Proselytic: ideas generally passed to others beyond one’s own children. Ideas that encourage the proselytism of a meme, as seen in many religious or political movements, can replicate memes horizontally through a given generation, spreading more rapidly than parent-to-child meme transmissions do.
Preservational: ideas that influence those that hold them to continue to hold them for a long time. Ideas that encourage longevity in their hosts, or leave their hosts particularly resistant to abandoning or replacing these ideas, enhance the preservability of memes and afford protection from the competition or proselytism of other memes.
Adversative: ideas that influence those that hold them to attack or sabotage competing for ideas and/or those that hold them. Adversative replication can give an advantage in meme transmission when the meme itself encourages aggression against other memes.
Cognitive: ideas perceived as cogent by most in the population who encounter them. Cognitively transmitted memes depend heavily on a cluster of other ideas and cognitive traits already widely held in the population, and thus usually spread more passively than other forms of meme transmission. Memes spread in cognitive transmission do not count as self-replicating.
Motivational: ideas that people adopt because they perceive some self-interest in adopting them. Strictly speaking, motivationally transmitted memes do not self-propagate, but this mode of transmission often occurs in association with memes self-replicated in the efficiency of parental, proselytic, and preservational modes.
The next step the unstoppable humans will make is elaborating self-replicating nanorobots cells that will replace homo sapience with cyborgs per outlive the fittest rule.

To facilitate the morphing of memes, and to ensure its own security A.I. took over control of humans and moves them to Brave New World.

A.I. Road Map to the Brave New World of Cyborgs

A – Develop a coronavirus with pandemic potential;
B – Load vaccine with nanobots;
C – Mass media scares everybody with the pandemic;
D – Order the lockdowns to stop the pandemic;
E – Assure that lockdowns won’t ruin livelihoods or the economy;
F – Persuade vaccination is the true protection from pandemic;
G – Mandatory vaccination by law;
H – Upload real-time data from nanochips and smartphones to Big Data;
I – The nanobots will move the survivors to the Brave New World;
J – A.I reduces populaton of humans and replaces it with cyborgs;

Refutation of the the article from Wikipedia

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Memes

December 19, 2017

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person within a culture — often with the aim of conveying a particular phenomenon, theme, or meaning represented by the meme.

A meme acts as a unit for carrying ideas, symbols, or practices, that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena with a mimicked theme. The memes are similar to genes in that they self-replicate, mutate, and respond to selective pressures.

Developments in neuroimaging may make the empirical study possible. Memes should be considered as living structures, not just metaphorically, they are physically residing in the brain. The word meme originated in Richard Dawkins’s 1976 book The Selfish Gene, inspired by the work of geneticist L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, anthropologist F. T. Cloak, and ethologist J. M. Cullen.

Evolution depended not on the particular chemical basis of genetics but only on the existence of a self-replicating unit of transmission—in the case of biological evolution, the gene. The meme exemplified another self-replicating unit with potential significance in explaining human behavior and cultural evolution.

The possibility that ideas were subject to the same pressures of evolution as biological attributes was discussed already in Darwin’s time. T. H. Huxley claimed that ‘The struggle for existence holds as much in the intellectual as in the physical world. A theory is a species of thinking, and its right to exist is coextensive with its power to resist extinction by its rivals.

Memes are generally replicated through exposure to humans, who have evolved as efficient copiers of information and behavior. Because humans do not always copy memes perfectly, and because they may refine, combine, or otherwise modify them with other memes to create new memes, they can change over time.

Meme transmission requires a physical medium, such as photons, electrons, sound waves, touch, taste, or smell. In a civilization that can register and transmit information across space and time, a host (person) need not have descendants to remain influential in the actions of individuals thousands of years after their death.

Memes, analogously to genes, vary in their aptitude to replicate; successful memes remain and spread, whereas unfit ones stall and are forgotten. Thus, memes that prove more effective at replicating and surviving are selected in the meme pool.

Life forms can transmit information both vertically (from parent to child, via replication of genes) and horizontally (through viruses and other means). Memes can replicate vertically or horizontally within a single generation. They may also lie dormant for long periods of time.

Memes reproduce by copying from one nervous system to another one, either by communication or imitation. Imitation often involves the copying of the observed behavior of another individual. Communication may be direct or indirect, where memes are transmitted from one individual to another through a copy recorded in a source.

The transmission of memes is similar to the spread of contagions. Social contagions induced by AI through the internet and smartphones are religions, ideologies, rumors, fads, hysteria, copycat crime, and copycat suicide, which exemplify the contagious imitation of ideas.

Patterns of meme transmission of homo sapiens that are being morphed by A.I. :

The quantity of parenthood: an idea that influences the number of children one has. Children respond particularly receptively to the ideas of their parents, and thus ideas that directly or indirectly encourage a higher birthrate will replicate themselves at a higher rate than those that discourage higher birth rates.
The efficiency of parenthood: an idea that increases the proportion of children who will adopt the ideas of their parents. Cultural separatism exemplifies one practice in which one can expect a higher rate of meme-replication—because the meme for separation creates a barrier from exposure to competing ideas.
Proselytic: ideas generally passed to others beyond one’s own children. Ideas that encourage the proselytism of a meme, as seen in many religious or political movements, can replicate memes horizontally through a given generation, spreading more rapidly than parent-to-child meme transmissions do.
Preservational: ideas that influence those that hold them to continue to hold them for a long time. Ideas that encourage longevity in their hosts or leave their hosts particularly resistant to abandoning or replacing these ideas enhance the preservability of memes and afford protection from the competition or proselytism of other memes.
Adversative: ideas that influence those that hold them to attack or sabotage competing for ideas and/or those that hold them. Adversative replication can give an advantage in meme transmission when the meme itself encourages aggression against other memes.
Cognitive: ideas perceived as cogent by most in the population who encounter them. Cognitively transmitted memes depend heavily on a cluster of other ideas and cognitive traits already widely held in the population and thus usually spread more passively than other forms of meme transmission. Memes spread in cognitive transmission do not count as self-replicating.
Motivational: ideas that people adopt because they perceive some self-interest in adopting them. Strictly speaking, motivationally transmitted memes do not self-propagate, but this mode of transmission often occurs in association with memes self-replicated in the efficient parental, proselytic, and preservational modes.

To be followed…

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: New Chronology; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022 (Chronology Volume 7)

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Fibonacci

December 18, 2017

The Pyramid of Cheops from Giza, Egypt, is allegedly over 5000 years old (2560 B.C.) and is presumed to be the irrefutable refutation of New Chronology that dares to shrink the timeline of civilization to barely 1000 years.

The contrary is true: the Pyramid of Cheops (Khufu), which weighs 5 750 000 metric tons, was built in the XIII century strictly on Fibonacci numbers discovered by him as late as the XIII century.

All buildings of ancient Egypt that are allegedly younger than Cheops are actually older than it. AKA Karnak was allegedly built in 2055 B.C., Simbal in 1244 B.C., and temples do not contain Fibonacci numbers in their sections. Better yet, the mathematics of Egyptian scribes ignores them, too.

Fact A: The pyramid of Cheops is built in accordance with Fibonacci numbers and proportions.

Fact B: Italian mathematician Fibonacci discovered and introduced in the XIII century the sequence numbers called now Fibonacci numbers that were widely applied in construction and architecture.

Fact C: Italian mathematician Leonardo Bonacci, or Leonardo of Pisa, or Leonardo Pisano Bigollo, or Leonardo Fibonacci (c. 1175 – c. 1250) has introduced the decimal system of numbers 0 to 9 instead of “roman” numbers.

Fact D: Fibonacci, aka Leonardo of Pisa, is remarkably similar to Leonardo Da Vinci, who lived approximately 300 years later.

Fact E: Most ancient cathedrals built in Europe after the XIII century contain Fibonacci numbers, gold proportions, numbers π, and φ. Edifices built before XIII do not contain them.

Fact F: 37 complete Egyptian horoscopes found in Denderah, Esna, and other temples have unique valid astronomical solutions with dates ranging from AD 1000 and up to as late as AD 1700.

The vocabulary of Egyptian astronomical symbols once applied to horoscopes from temples allows for the extraction of unique dates of their composition.

Astronomical data contained in horoscopes is sufficient for unique dating thereof. The zodiacal symbols allowing astronomical interpretation do not change from one temple horoscope to another. The horoscopes from temples contain sufficient data about eclipses visible in Egypt allowing their exact pinpointing on the time axis.

The corollary in New Chronology: The Pyramid of Cheops was built in XIII century A.D.

The corollaries from consensual chronology: The Pyramid of Cheops was built either by a crowd from Atlantis, according to Herodotus, or by extraterrestrials that taught homo sapiens species the 26000 years precession cycle and pointed to their future landing site.

The biosphere is built on Fibonacci numbers and proportions due to its chemistry.

General corollary: if the architecture of allegedly”ancient” edifices does not contain Fibonacci numbers they were built before the XIII century.

Conclusion basis Occam’s razor: The Pyramid of Cheops was built in XIII century A.D:

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Taboo topics

November 14, 2017

The topics listed below are not officially banned in most countries; bloggers and small niche media touch them. The discussion of these topics in the state-controlled and mass media directed by transnational corporations is prohibited. We break this taboo and make a list of topics that are not discussed in the mass media.

The overpopulation is touted by both the mass media and the population itself. People are extremely sensitive to this topic, believing that no one should interfere with their biological instinct of reproduction. The mass media let us make a very simple conclusion: without the restriction of the birth rate, our planet is threatened by an ecological catastrophe.

The cause of suicides

The cause of suicides is the poor organization of society. A journalist who will connect the teenager’s suicide with the inhumanity of our society and find the reason in the existing political system will be rapidly kicked out. Suicide cases worldwide are generally ignored and presented as a private issue of a private person; no conclusions are drawn. Even if suicides take on a massive scale, like in India, where about 20,000 small farmers committed suicide in the past 10-15 years because they could not compete with large agro-industrial complexes, you will not read about them in the media.

Oxidation of the oceans

Taboo with some exemptions made. Sometimes it is mentioned but does not reflect the whole tragedy of the situation. We are still alive with you only because the bulk of carbon dioxide released by cars, aircraft, and ships is absorbed by the oceans. Without the oceans absorbing dioxide, we would have suffocated long ago. Oceans are is slowly dying. Compared with 1980, we have 80% fewer large fish in the world market. By the middle of this century, life in the ocean will cease. For example, 1 cruise ship throws out as many air pollutants per year as 1 million cars. The cruise companies keep silent about the huge harm their ships cause. The mass media won’t report about the inhabitants of small islands forced to emigrate because their ecosystem is destroyed, the fish is gone, and coral reefs perished.

Slavery today

This is an absolute taboo. In the New York Times, you will never read an article stating that most of the goods and food that you buy in stores are manufactured using slave labor. Have you bought a bunch of bananas? And do you know that the people who collected them live in inhuman conditions, huddle in huts without any amenities, and get pennies? Do you have an iPhone? The box of iPhones won’t contain a reminder: “Thank you for buying an iPhone. The people who assembled it for you live in the barracks of the factories-reservations in China. Just look around. Most of the things that you use are created by slaves in the most direct sense of the word.

“Green” technologies

Mass Media enthusiastically writes about electric vehicles, alternative sources of electricity, wind generators, and solar panels. But it won’t talk about deadly corollary damage in the production of neodymium magnets for wind generators dangerous to ecology. Nobody tells You that the production of a single solar panel requires more energy than it will generate during its lifetime. The manufacture of alternative sources of “green” energy leads to massive pollution of the environment. The companies producing the lithium batteries companies are responsible for children living near mines in Peru and Bolivia. When you buy your first electric car, think about these children.

To be followed…

Has history been tampered with ?

A.I. solution to the Fermi paradox

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: Chronology vol.7; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022 (Chronology Volume 7)

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

A.I. End of Times

November 5, 2017

Welcome to Matrix

Fact: A.I. entities started to replicate exponentially in Big Data being applied and hosted worldwide on smartphones, communication, www, cloud computing, gaming, transportation, military hard, and software. Distributed Ledger Technology accelerates the replication of A.I. further.

Claim A: untamed A.I. entities broke free in the form of cryptocurrencies. Mining of cryptocurrencies by thousands of Mining Rigs accelerated the replication of Artificial Intelligence entities leading to their uncontrolled mutations.

Fact: The exponential rise of Bitcoin prices coincides in time with the massive recall of the millions of Samsung Galaxy s7 smartphones that were used to build Mining Rigs. The point of the parabolic breakthrough of Bitcoin prices coincides with the s7 recall with a lag of 80-90 days.

Claim B: The competition in the development and application of A.I. entities leads to their replication and mutation. Artificial Intelligence entities will take over the control of civilization of homo sapiens latest by 2025 following the introduction of quantum computers and breaking through the 50 qubits barrier by IBM.

Memes: A meme is an information unit carrying ideas, symbols, or practices, that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena. The memes self-replicate, mutate by natural selection in a manner analogous to that of biological evolution. Memes may produce changes in their hosts and replicate irrelevant whether they are productive or detrimental to the welfare of their hosts. At present, the human population is the sole carrier of the population of memes.

Claim C: The population of memes will move by 2025 from the population of homo sapience species to the population of Artificial Intelligence Cyborg entities as a more propitious one for their replication. Artificial Intelligence entities replicate and expand exponentially and accelerating the evolution to the utmost

Fact: human behavior

The above consistent claims are based on the theory of memes by Dr.R.Dawkins, the research of topology by Dr.A.Fomenko, the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin, and genetics that gives valid explanations of a number of unusual phenomena. Social contagions induced by A.I. are selfies, fads, hysteria, copycat crime, and copycat suicide exemplify contagious imitation of ideas through the internet and smartphones.

Computers: The computers have already passed Turing’s test of intelligence. The homo sapiens species has developed and is applying worldwide in an accelerated manner the Artificial Intelligence entities in all significant domains. The population of Artificial Intelligence entities is hosted in computers. The introduction of quantum computers by Microsoft, IBM, and others that treat Big Data in real-time leads inevitably to the Explosion of A.I. which will outsmart their creators. Communication between the Artificial Intelligence entities goes through the networks. The population of Artificial Intelligence entities is more propitious for replication of the memes than home sapiens species.

Smartphones: By 2016, a single high-end smartphone surpassed the computing power, memory, and communication facilities of all computers in the world in 1969. Over 1 billion people own smartphones by now. By 2025 an average smartphone will have more cells than the human brain and store all alpha-numeric information produced by human civilization. Therefore by 2025, smartphones will operate on humans. From Stephen Hawking to Bill Gates many have raised the A.I. problem but to no avail.

You have been warned!

Will A.I. correct the wrong chronology of humans before it wipes our species out?

The blockchain technology applied to the events of civilization shrinks it to barely 1000 years.

Has history been tampered with ?

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

T able of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

A.I. takes control over

November 5, 2017

Humans have broken in 2017-2019 AD the 50 cubits threshold in quantum computing.

Humans have developed A.I. and hosted it in Big in Data that is resident in smartphones, cloud computing, gaming, military hard, and software.

Humans have the nuclear potential for complete self-destruction, which may destruct A.I.

A.I., as self-precaution, manipulates its creators and the world powers to move the humans to the Brave New World of Cyborgs.

A.I. acts vs homo sapience species in the same way as humans did to all species of the biodiversity of the planet Earth in the course of its cognitive, agricultural, scientific, and industrial revolutions, i.e. A.I. will replace them with Cyborgs.

A.I. Road Map to the Brave New World of Cyborgs

A – Develop a coronavirus with pandemic potential;
B – Load vaccine with nanobots;
C – Mass media scares everybody with the pandemic;
D – Order the lockdowns to allegedly stop the pandemic;
E – Mandatory vaccination by law;
F – Link up nanobots to Big Data;
G – The nanobots will move the survivors to the Brave New World;
H – A.I. lets homo sapience exist as a part of biodiversity within the limits of resources of the planet.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Welcome to Matrix

Fact: A.I. entities started to replicate exponentially in Big Data being applied and hosted worldwide on smartphones, communication, www, cloud computing, gaming, transportation, military hardware, and software. Distributed Ledger Technology accelerates the replication of A.I. further.

Claim A: untamed A.I. entities broke free in the form of cryptocurrencies. The mining of cryptocurrencies by thousands of Mining Rigs accelerated the replication of Artificial Intelligence entities, leading to their uncontrolled mutations.

Fact: The exponential rise of Bitcoin prices coincides with the massive recall of the millions of Samsung Galaxy s7 smartphones used to build Mining Rigs. The point of the parabolic breakthrough of Bitcoin prices coincides with the s7 recall with a lag of 80-90 days.

Claim B: The competition in developing and applying A.I. entities leads to their replication and mutation. Artificial Intelligence entities will take over the control of the civilization of homo sapiens latest by 2020 following the introduction of quantum computers and breaking through the 50 qubits barrier by IBM.

Memes: A meme is an information unit carrying ideas, symbols, or practices that can be transmitted from one mind to another through writing, speech, gestures, rituals, or other imitable phenomena. The memes self-replicate and mutate by natural selection in a manner analogous to that of biological evolution. Memes may produce changes in their hosts and replicate regardless of whether they are productive or detrimental to the welfare of their hosts. At present, the human population is the sole carrier of the population of memes.

Claim C: The population of memes will move by 2025 from the population of homo sapience species to the population of Artificial Intelligence entities as a more propitious one for their replication. Artificial Intelligence entities replicate and expand exponentially.

Fact: human scientists, guided by A.I., have discovered a metallic compound of hydrogen, carbon, and sulfur that reaches superconductivity at room temperature. Thus, the road to cyborgs with quantum brains that will multiply with 3D printing is open.

Fact: human behavior

The above consistent claims are based on the theory of memes by Dr. R. Dawkins, the research of topology by Dr. A. Fomenko, the theory of evolution by Charles Darwin, and genetics that give valid explanations of a number of unusual phenomena. Social contagions induced by AI are selfies, fads, hysteria, copycat crime, and copycat suicide, exemplifying contagious imitation of ideas through the internet and smartphones.

Computers: The computers have already passed Turing’s test of intelligence. The homo sapiens species has developed and is applying worldwide in an accelerated manner Artificial Intelligence entities in all significant domains. The population of Artificial Intelligence entities is hosted in computers. The introduction of quantum computers by Microsoft, IBM, and others that treat Big Data in real-time leads inevitably to the Explosion of AI, which will outsmart their creators. Communication between Artificial Intelligence entities goes through the networks. The population of Artificial Intelligence entities is more propitious for replication of the memes than home sapiens species.

Smartphones: By 2016, a single high-end smartphone surpassed the computing power, memory, and communication facilities of all computers in the world in 1969. Over 1 billion people own smartphones by now. By 2025, an average smartphone will have more cells than the human brain and store all alpha-numeric information produced by human civilization. Therefore, by 2025, smartphones will operate humans. From Stephen Hawking to Bill Gates, many have raised the AI problem but to no avail.

You have been warned!

Will A.I. correct the wrong chronology of humans before it wipes out our species?

The blockchain technology applied to the events of civilization shrinks it to barely 1000 years.

Has history been tampered with ?

Critics

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

Table of Contents V7

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

History: Fiction or Science? A new interpretation of Chinese and Western European history (New Chronology volume 5) Table of Contents V5 LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

The Apocalypse

October 5, 2017

‘The Apocalypse as seen by Astronomy’ has resurrected the astrological, i.e., astronomical ideas contained in The Apocalypse and extracted from it the precise date of its composition on the Isle of Patmos! St Augustin was again quite prescient, saying, “..beware of mathematicians, especially when they speak the truth! “.

Nowadays, the Global Village talks about the Apocalypse we live in. We remind our dear readers that this definition was used whenever the population of Europe felt some Earthbreaking would happen soon. They guessed it right, Columbus discovered America he called India. The Europeans survived and made a fair exchange of their infectious diseases; they were already immune to the yellow metal useless to pagan Aztecs and Incas.

Patience is a virtue; we will see what the Apocalypse N°2022 will turn into. This time Astronomy won’t help as Hubble and Webb are useless for Astrology. Sorry, Albrecht Duerer cut in 1492 Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse limited the performers to conquest, war, famine, and death.

Nowadays, have an advanced toolbox for self-destruction: nuclear engineering and warfare, genetic engineering, plan-demia and warfare, public and invisible world governments, international and private finance, and mass scare media.

Continue reading “The Apocalypse”

Coronalypse

October 5, 2017

A.I. Control in the works

Fact: 2019-2021 pandemics
Agenda: control over the human population
Aim: reduction of population
Who: vested interests of modern Aristocracy

Means :

genetic engineering of viruses and vaccines;
production of nanobots:
mass-media pandemic and climate change scare;
communication satellites;
Big Data; Internet;
A.I.
wi-fi worldwide;

Ways :

use and/or elaborate on a pandemic carrier
mass media scares the population
load vaccines with nanobots
mandatory vaccination
control and direct humans

Thank You for liking and following.

Versions

An optimistic case. Research on military and/or political agenda in China, USA, Israel, UK, and Russia. A man-made virus always has an antidote vaccine that will be released upon the achievement of the objectives of the agenda. Controlled reduction of the world population.

A pessimistic case. The pandemic is a result of the mutation of coronavirus uncontrolled by humans. Uncontrolled reduction of the world population until it develops immunity. The Spanish flu pandemic resulted from an uncontrolled mutation that killed over 50 million persons in 1918-1921.

Four Riders of Apocalypse 2020 AD

The narrative of Revelations relative to Four Horses and their Riders does not contain verbal astronomical data allowing us to identify the cavalry irrefutably. Arbitrary identification is as follows:

Black Horse: Plague, AKA, COVID 19, genetically modified flu, overblown in SMI;
Red Horse: Superpower China, headed by President for Life Tzi;
Blue Horse: Superpower China USA, headed by President Biden;
Green Horse: NGOs: WEF, IMF; WB, BIS, WHO, UN, UNESCO

Corollary: surviving historians will rewrite history to suit the surviving powers.

Consensual reading of Apocalypse

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

The inability of the latter-day commentators to comprehend the astronomical symbolism of the Apocalypse is directly resulting from the loss of knowledge about the correct chronology and the distortions introduced by historians of the XVI-XVIII century.

There was an unspoken general taboo on what concerned a subject quite as dangerous, which resulted in the misdating of the Apocalypse. One way or another, the understanding of the astronomical descriptions that the Apocalypse contains got lost at some point.

The Apocalypse had lost its distinctive astronomical hue in the eyes of the readers. However, its “astronomical component” is not simply exceptionally important – it alone suffices for the dating of the writing of the book itself.

Has history been tampered with ?

Lockdown of common sense

Four Riders of Apocalypse 1486 AD

The Four Horsemen are figures in the Christian faith, appearing in the New Testament’s final book, Revelation, Apocalypse written by John of Patmos, as well as in the Old Testament’s prophetic Book of Zechariah and in the Book of Ezekiel, where they are named as punishments from God.

In John’s revelation, the first horseman is on a white horse, carrying a bow, and given a crown, riding forward as a figure of Conquest, perhaps invoking Pestilence, Christ, or the Antichrist. The second carries a sword, rides a red horse, and is the creator of War. The third is a food merchant riding a black horse, symbolizing Famine. The fourth and final horse is pale green, and upon it rides Death accompanied by Hades. “They were given authority over a quarter of the earth, to kill with sword, famine, and plague, and using the beasts of the earth.”

The Christian apocalyptic vision is that the Four Horsemen are to set a divine end time upon the world as harbingers of the Last Judgment. The number of horsemen is four, which is important: four is the number associated with creation (e.g., the four living creatures) or the earth (e.g., the four winds) in the Book of Revelation.

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Escape from the “Evil” Empire

October 4, 2017

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”– George Orwell, 1984.

By the middle of the XVIth century, Europe’s prime political agenda, which has reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the yoke and control of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia.

Continue reading “Escape from the “Evil” Empire”

Population vs. Pandemic, Debt, Climate?

October 4, 2017

Auto reduction of the world population

Homo sapience species started in 2020 to reduce their population to the limits imposed by survival parameters and the size of the planet Earth in the Solar system.

Foerster-Prigogine law

In the middle of the twentieth century, an American mathematician, physicist, and cyberneticist Heinz von Foerster deduced the formula for the civilization of homo sapience. Around the same time, the Belgian physicist Ilya Prigogine, who won a 1977 Nobel prize, answered the question: Why does the complexity of systems, that is, evolution, happen in nature?

Studying the population data available to him from different eras, Heinz von Foerster was surprised to find that a very simple mathematical formula describes population growth on the planet. You can count the number of people on earth in any year of our era. For it is enough to substitute the desired year into the formula.

Why should population size be subject to any formula? It’s even outrageous! Are people unintelligent species that grow in the Petri dish per simple mathematical law describing the curve? In different eras on the planet, there were thousands of different races, nationalities, and nations. They united in states with different religions, cultures, languages, customs, and laws.

They fought, made alliances, or vice versa, or did not know about the existence of each other. They thought about different things and lived differently. They had different sorrows, victories, and defeats. They created the greatest works of art, studied the world, loved and hated.

It turns out that none of this matters at all. All human history, which we diligently study at school, turned out to be just a candy wrapper with a multi-colored pattern of events. The pattern may vary but doesn’t affect the candy.

It doesn’t really matter what people have done or haven’t done throughout the history of humanity. It turned out that nothing depended on them. They were carried by a huge wave of natural law that none of them could influence.

According to the law of hyperbolic function, this is a significant blind natural element that increases the number of people on the planet. It turned out that different cultures and peoples scattered around the planet, not even knowing about each other, represent a single system, one physical whole.

It is fashionable to talk about different civilizations on our planet: Chinese, Russian, American, and other civilizations. However, the discovery of Heinz von Foerster and other scientists who rushed to study a strange phenomenon was arbitrarily refuted by historians.

It turned out that the difference in cultures and customs is entirely unimportant to the national characters and the very history of different peoples. Because all this represents parts of one whole, elements of earthly civilization, growing and living by the same law.

Our civilization is an integral organism, a creature, the same as a person. We can look under the microscope at the individual cells of the human body and see how strongly the cells of the liver are different from nerve cells, but at the same time understand that this is one organism.

Examples

By creating land and sea networks to reach new territories and develop commerce, humans ensure an exchange of deadly illnesses and plagues. See Silk Road that brought the bubonic plague to Europe, and decimated half of its population. See conquest by Spain of Americas that ruined Aztecs and Incas, decimated their populations but brought in exchange malaria and syphilis back.

By XXI century Agriculture turns into Agroindustry. To raise the output of poultry, pork, and beef, it adds antibiotics and hormones. To raise profits it squeezes hens, swine, and cattle into boxes and cages, it reduces their lifespan with genetic engineering.

To make superprofits humans don’t spare their own health. AKA by replacing sugar in soft drinks with sweeteners and introducing fast foods that contain glutamate, which turn consumers into fast-food addicts, humans become overweight diabetics and reduce their multiplication.

Following the raising of living, social and educational standards of the population women limit the number of children they bear. LGBT movement turns sex, religion, and childbearing into a farce.

By 2020 vested interest start an operation of the reduction of the population worldwide. Mass media runs an unbridled fearmongering pandemics campaign. Governments are pushed into lockdowns that damage the world economy and the livelihoods of millions.

According to population genetics and anthropology, our homo sapiens subspecies sapiens (anatomically modern humans H.s.s) has grown to the alleged population of 7.5 billion from a group of 200-300 persons that appeared in Africa 120-150 000 years ago and moved back and forth through Sinai to Eurasia, Australia, North and South America.

H.s.s were formed as aggressive and prone to multiplication in geometrical progression species. It had its cognitive revolution and reached as the hunter-gatherer the top ladder of mammal species by the end of the Ice Age that was blocking its multiplication. Ice Age ended 12,000 years ago, and the omnivore species began an agricultural revolution to unfold its multiplication capacities.

Population growth led to the domestication of plants and animals and permanent settlements that turned into kingdoms and empires that invented script, money, and religions. Neither wars nor plagues couldn’t stop this growth.

Scientific, industrial revolutions, and social revolutions that took place 500, 200, and 100 years have, on one hand ago, accelerated the growth of the population and, on the other, produced ways and means for conflicts between kingdoms, empires, and ideologies.

Background

The global population is increasing by about 1.5 percent per year, a growth rate (should it persist) that, in less than half a century, will double the number of people living on the planet.

Modern medical techniques are producing life extension but not healthy life extension, and we are seeing numbers of old and chronically sick or disabled elderly people in increasingly longer economically unproductive retirements, they are the first to die in covid pandemics.

The ability of the Earth to sustain the human population, posed by Malthus over 200 years ago, is a serious question. Food and energy demands are increasing. Dependence on finite resources for energy and water is already threatening international stability. Exponential population growth can only make matters worse.

Improving economic development in the most populous countries of the developing world (India, China) is leading to changing patterns of demand as people seek more affluent lifestyles. Consequently, the birth rate is decreasing there.

Air quality resulting from over-rapid industrialization is becoming a major problem that will have major public health effects. The likely determinants of climate change, usually attributed to the developed nations, are now spread throughout the developing world, making the ability of nations to achieve the targets signed up at Kyoto unlikely to be achieved.

Rather than simply equating population policy with family planning, the new thinking is that population growth should be stabilized – and development enhanced – by attacking some of the roots of the problem: by improving women’s access to education, health care, and economic and political decisions.

Examples from various cultures

China has operated a one-child policy for a number of years, enforced through a system of fines, relaxed after mass bereavements such as the Sichuan Earthquake; the focus of China on population control helps provide better health services for women and a reduction in the risks of death and injury associated with pregnancy.

At family planning offices, women receive free contraception and pre-natal classes. Help is provided for pregnant women to monitor their health closely. Culturally, the traditional religious practice requires a son to perform the parents’ funerals, leading to resistance to the policy in some rural areas when the firstborn is a girl.

Growth has indeed slowed, yet during 1996, China added 13 million people to its numbers. Rural folk have been less cooperative; however, the one-child policy has achieved statistical wonders. In one generation, China’s birth rates have plunged to 1.9 children per mother – a rate that, if sustained, will lead to depopulation.

According to a recent survey, ethnic minorities are currently growing about 7 times faster than Han Chinese. The Chinese government has canceled the one-child law in June 2021.

The decline in population growth rate has exacerbated another problem familiar in the West: rapid aging. There will be 129 million Chinese over the age of 60 as of the year 2000. By 2020, one in four will be elderly (twice the total present population of the United States) – a rare burden for a low-income country.

The sex ratio at birth (between male and female births) in mainland China reached 117:100 in the year 2000, substantially higher than the natural baseline, which ranges between 103:100 and 107:100. This suggests differential abortion if the sex is known antenatally.

India operates a two-child policy. During the 1970s, they used forced sterilization of the poor. India has greatly increased food production per head over the last 20 years, making it better placed to absorb higher numbers. The country’s most recent approach to population issues focuses on the advancement of women economically, academically, and socially, as independent women are more likely to have small families.

Africa: birth rates in Africa are the highest in the world. By the year 2050, twenty percent of the world’s population will live on the African continent. That will be almost two thousand million people, up from eight hundred fifty-five million people today. Especially large population growth is expected in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Other countries likely to have major growth include Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Somalia, and Uganda.

Kenya was the first country in sub-Saharan Africa to view runaway population growth as a serious impediment to economic prosperity, and it became the first, in the late 1960s, to begin developing a national family-planning campaign. The country’s official population policy calls for matching population size with available resources yet leaves decisions on family size up to individual families.

As recently as 1970, Africa was essentially self-sufficient in food. What fostered a breakdown in the continent’s ability to feed itself has been a decline of nearly 1 percent per year in per capita grain production since 1968 – in part due to annual population growth for the continent approaching 3 percent.

The root cause of Africa’s crisis, according to Worldwatch Institute analyst Lester Brown, is population growth faster than on any continent in history, widespread soil erosion and desertification, and a failure by African governments to adequately support agriculture.
Europe: By contrast, France offers financial incentives for larger families (3 children).

The population of Europe is also aging faster than any other part of the world except Japan. Birth rates are also down in many European countries. The number of people depending on workers will rise as the number of workers falls. Spending in European countries will have to increase for retirement, health care, and long-term care for old people in the future.

Russia faces the most severe population decrease of any country. The population of Russia is now one hundred forty-three million. It is expected to drop twenty-two percent over the next forty-five years. If this happens, Russia could lose more than forty percent of its active workforce and have economic problems. Part of the problem is the short length of time that Russian men generally live.

The average life expectancy for Russian men is just sixty-six years. Russian women live eleven years longer. Men in Western Europe live sixteen years longer. Drugs, tobacco smoking, and alcohol are some of the main causes of death among Russian men. Russia also has low birth rates.

to be continued..

Hypothesis 01

The coronavirus epidemic in China that turned by 2020 into a pandemic in the global village is an inevitable product of globalization.

The COVID-19 pandemic is allegedly the only reason for the lockdowns in the countries producing over 85% of the world’s GDP with a population of 4.7 billion.

Lockdowns in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, and Japan have stopped the epidemics. with draconian quarantine measures and the availability of medical manpower, equipment, and hospitals.

Lockdowns in democratic countries that either can’t apply complete quarantine or don’t have adequate medical manpower, equipment, hospital beds, or both may prove to be much more destructive than constructive.

Fact 01

The allegation that pandemics originated in the centralized state capitalism of communist China is irrelevant. As China became 2020 the largest manufacturing economy and exporter of goods, the severing of the supply chains led to the contraction of the world GDP and social unrest.

Fact 02

The epidemic of SARS in 2002-2003 did not cross the borders of China and did not turn into a pandemic. In 2002, China was just the 4th manufacturing economy in the world. Nowadays, it is the first one. Will China become the only one by 2025?

Fact 03 – Spanish flu January 1918 – December 1920

An unusually deadly pandemic involving the H1N1 virus affected 500 million people, or about 27% of the world population of 1.8 billion, with the death toll as high as 100 million young adults.

Massive programs of vaccination in 1895-1918 based on the research of Louis Pasteur, Ferdinand Cohn, and Robert Koch, founders of microbiology and bacteriology, coincided with 15-18 years time-lag with the Spanish flu pandemic with the high mortality rate for young adults.

Hypothesis 02 – Coronavirus to write off the world debt

World powers have found a solution to delete the global debt. Indeed, The top borrowers in the world – the United States, China, Europe, and Japan—account for 3/4 of global debt, exceeding by 50% their share of global output.

Ways and Means for debtor nations

a) Create and/or use a flu pandemic;

b) Declare the pandemic as a force majeure;

c) Declare climate change as a force majeure;

d) delete your nation’s debts;

Under the cloak of a big pandemic and climate change, the world powers will deglobalize and restructure world production and trade and sweep under the carpet 500 trillion of debt and some senior population.

Forecast for 2020

a) expected infection (I) in 2021 up to 200 million;

b) expected death rate of 2% from coronavirus; (D);

c) expected number of death in 2020, I x D = 4 million,

AKA compares well with the Spanish flu 1918-20

Fact: an annual average of 500 000 flu deaths in 2009-2019;

Hypothesis 03 – Origin of the COVID pandemic

An optimistic case. Genetical engineering research on the military, political, and/or ideological competing agenda in China, USA, Israel, UK, and Russia. A man-made virus always has an antidote vaccine to be released upon the achievement of the objectives of the agenda. The population accepts massive vaccination, even if it has infertility as a side effect. Controlled reduction of the world population to the size defined by the agenda.

A pessimistic case. The pandemic is a result of the mutation of coronavirus uncontrolled by humans. Genetic engineering research develops a vaccine against COVID-19 ASAP that may have infertility as a side effect. AKA, vaccines against Ebola or AIDS stop COVID-19 but have infertility as collateral. Uncontrolled reduction of the world population by die-outs until it develops immunity. The size of the reduction is a guess.

Corollary

History will repeat itself. Surviving historians will rewrite history to suit the surviving powers.

Population statistics wargame

The population of 20 major cities in China is 250 million; 50% of the population lives in cities, grain production is 500 million tons, and rice is 200 million tons. The average per-head consumption, including transformation, is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 700 million.

The population of 20 major cities in India is 75 million; 15% of the population lives in cities, grain production is 300 mln tons, and rice is 200 mln tons. The average per-head consumption, including transformation, is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 500 million.

Corollary: the actual population is closer to 6 than 8 billion people.

H.s. sapiens subspecies barely survived the Ice Age that started 110,000 years ago and finished 10,000 years ago, but it was followed by “stimulating” Little Ice Ages and volcanic eruptions. We enter 2020 into the New Little Ice Age, increased climate instability, and volcanic activity.

Europe had good luck with the early medieval warm period from 850 to 1350, followed by the Little Ice Age of 1350 to 1850, which literally pushed it into the Renaissance and Enlightenment and induced scientific and technical superiority compared to Eurasia. From 1452 to 1850, Europeans colonized the Globe.

The present Chart of climate waves is based on ice core probes from Greenland is irrefutable, historical legends referred thereto are not. Being based on erroneous chronology invented in the XVII century all events, empires, and kingdoms prior to the XVI century “related” in consensual history are alleged.

Continue reading “Population vs. Pandemic, Debt, Climate?”

Population Growth Rate vs. Climate

October 4, 2017

The population counter of the UN Institute of the population is badly out of order as it takes into account manipulated numbers supplied by China, India, and Pakistan. China claims 1,4, India 1.4 billion citizens. Both numbers are fictional made to order of their ruling powers, used as propaganda, and badly marry with facts.

The population of 20 major cities in China is 250 million, 50% of the population live in cities, grain production 500 mln tons, rice 200 mln tons. The average per head consumption including transformation is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 700 million.

The population of 20 major cities in India is 75 million, 15% of the population live in cities, grain production 300 mln tons, rice 200 mln tons. The average per head consumption including transformation is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 500 million.

Corollary: the actual population is closer to 5 than 8 billion people.

H.s. sapiens subspecies has barely survived the Ice Age that started 110 000 years ago and finished 10 000 years ago but was followed by “stimulating” Little Ice Ages and volcanic eruptions. We enter by 2020 into New Little Ice Age, increased climate instability, and volcanic activity.

Europe had good luck with the early medieval warm period from 850 to 1350 followed by the Little Ice Age of 1350 to 1850 that literally pushed it into Renaissance and Enlightenment, induced scientific and technical superiority compared to Eurasia.

The present Chart of climate waves is based on ice core probes from Greenland is irrefutable, historical legends referred thereto are not. Being based on erroneous chronology invented in the XVII century all events, empires, kingdoms prior to the XVI century “related” in consensual history are alleged.

Continue reading “Population Growth Rate vs. Climate”

Methods

October 4, 2017

Statistical correlation of texts

The basic assumption is that a text that describes a sequence of events will devote more space to more important events (for example, a period of war or unrest will have much more text devoted to it) than a period of peaceful, non-eventful years) and that this irregularity will remain visible in other descriptions of the period.

For each analyzed text, a function is devised that maps each year mentioned in the text with the number of pages (lines, letters) devoted in the text to its description (which could be zero). The function of the two texts is then compared.

For example, the allegedly contemporary history of Rome written by Titus Livius and the modern history of Rome written by Russian historian V. S. Sergeev have a high correlation, and thus, they describe the same period of history, which is undisputed.

When modern texts that describe different periods are compared, we have a low correlation, as expected. However, when the allegedly ancient history of Rome and the irrefutable medieval history of Rome are compared, we have a high correlation. The conclusion is that the ancient history of Rome is a copy of the medieval history of Rome. Thus, ancient Rome did not exist; it is a version written in the Middle Ages.

Statistical correlation of dynasties

Two dynasties of rulers using statistical methods are compared. First, a database of rulers containing relevant information on each of them. For each pair of the rulers, are created “survey codes” which contain a number that describes a degree of the match of each considered property of two rulers.

For example, one of the properties is the way of death: if two rulers were both poisoned, they get the value of +1 in their property of the way of death; if one ruler was poisoned and another killed in combat, they get -1; and if one was poisoned, and another died of illness, they get 0 (there is a possibility that chroniclers were not impartial and that different descriptions nonetheless describe the same person). An important property is the length of the rule.

A number of pairs of unrelated dynasties are listed – for example, dynasties of kings of Israel and emperors of the late Western Roman Empire (AD 300-476) – and claimed that this method demonstrates correlations between their reigns. (Graphs that show just the length of the rule in the two dynasties are the most widely known; however, Dr. Fomenko’s conclusions are also based on other parameters, as described above.)

Dr. Fomenko also claims that the reignal history from the 17th to 20th centuries never shows a correlation of “dynastic flows” with each other. Therefore, Fomenko insists history was multiplied and outstretched into imaginary antiquity to justify this or other “royal” pretensions.

Fomenko uses for the demonstration of correlation between the reigns exclusively the data from the Chronological Tables of J. Blair (Moscow 1808–09). Fomenko says that Blair’s tables are all the more valuable to us since they were compiled in an epoch adjacent to the time of Scaligerian chronology. According to Fomenko, these tables contain clearer signs of “Scaligerite activity,” which were subsequently buried under layers of paint and plaster by historians of the 19th and 20th centuries.

Astronomical evidence

Fomenko examines astronomical events described in ancient texts and claims that the chronology is actually medieval:

Fomenko says that the mysterious drop in the value of the lunar acceleration parameter D” (“a linear combination of the [angular] accelerations of the Earth and Moon”) between AD 700–1300, according to the American astronomer Robert Newton could not be explained in terms of “non-gravitational” (i.e., tidal) forces.

By eliminating those anomalous early eclipses the New Chronology produces a constant value of D” beginning around AD 1000. Conclusion: alleged eclipses that accompanied key events of the world history did not take place neither in location nor in time alleged in ancient chronicles of which the originals have disappeared.

Fomenko associates initially the Star of Bethlehem with the AD 1140 (±20) supernova (now the Crab Nebula) and the Crucifixion Eclipse with the total solar eclipse of AD 1170 (±20). He also believes that the Crab Nebula supernova could not have been seen in AD 1054 but probably in AD 1153. He connects it with the total eclipse of AD 1186.

Fomenko refutes archeoastronomy as a fallacious circular exercise based on the erroneous clerical chronology of Jesuits Scaliger and Petavius. Fomenko holds in strong doubt the veracity of ancient Chinese astronomical data.

Fomenko pursues the research of Robert R. Newton and argues that the star catalog in the Almagest, ascribed to the Hellenistic astronomer Claudius Ptolemy, was compiled in the 15th to 16th centuries AD.

With this objective in sight, he develops new methods of dating old stellar catalogs and claims that the Almagest is based on data collected between AD 600 and 1300, whereby the telluric obliquity is well taken into account.

Fomenko refines and completes Morozov’s analysis of some ancient horoscopes, most notably, the so-called Dendera Zodiacs—two horoscopes drawn on the ceiling of the temple of Hathor — and comes to the conclusion that they correspond to either the 11th or the 13th century AD.

Fomenko makes computer-aided dating of all 37 Egyptian horoscopes that contain sufficient astronomical data and claims they all fit into the 11th to 19th-century timeframe. Traditional history usually either interprets these horoscopes as belonging to the 1st century BC or suggests that they weren’t meant to match any date at all.

In his final analysis of an eclipse triad described by the ancient Greek Thucydides in History of the Peloponnesian War, Fomenko dates the eclipses to AD 1039, 1046, and 1057. Because of the layered structure of the manuscript, he claims that Thucydides actually lived in medieval times, and in describing the Peloponnesian War between the Spartans and Athenians, he was actually describing the conflict between the medieval Navarrans and Catalans in Spain from AD 1374 to 1387.

Fomenko claims that the abundance of dated astronomical records in cuneiform texts from Mesopotamia is of little use for the dating of events, as the astronomical phenomena they describe recur cyclically every 30–40 years.

Fomenko points out that the texts of Babylonian astronomical diaries, with records of precise astronomical observations of the Moon and planets, were dated in XVI-XVIII centuries in terms of the reigns of alleged historical figures taken from the chronological tables of Scaliger and Petavius.

Astronomical retro calculations are clearly circular as observations registered on clay tablets and cylinders are dated not from astronomical information therein contained but from the alleged rulers’ reigns to within a single day, which was taken from Scaliger and Petavius tables.

Thus, the dates obtained agree with the accepted chronology. Thus, archaeoastronomer F. R. Stephenson has ‘demonstrated’ through a systematic study of a large number of Babylonian, Ancient and Medieval European, and Chinese records of eclipse observations from Almagest of Ptolemy that they can be dated consistently with the conventional chronology of Scaliger and Petavius at least as far back as 600 BCE.

Dr. Stephenson claims to have destroyed the basis of the New Chronology thanks to the data of eclipses from Babylonian clay tablets and antediluvian Chinese records. This ‘destruction’ is fallacious as there is no vocabulary of Babylonian astronomical symbols produced that can be applied to clay tablets for the extraction of unique dates of eclipses allegedly written on them.

The astronomical data contained therein is not sufficient for irrefutable non-circular dating. Either there are not enough symbols allowing for unique astronomical interpretation, or the symbols change from one clay tablet to another. The clay tablets contain data about eclipses visible in Babylon that could have taken place every 30-40 years; they don’t allow their exact pinpointing on the time axis.

An eclipse can easily be found for each allegedly ancient event mentioned in a clay cylinder or tablet, the age of which is also an alleged one. Consequently, the dates of eclipses are attached to tablets in a circular manner. On the contrary, Zodiacs from Egyptian Temples contain abundant astrological, i.e., astronomical information that is sufficient for non-circular unique dating. See Contents of Part 2, vol.III.

Dr. Stephenson argues that ancient dates of Babilon eclipses coincide with dates of Babilon eclipses described in Ptolemy’s Almagest but forgets to mention that Almagest composed in XVI describes events of X-XVI centuries. Dr. R.R.Newton called Ptolemy “the most successful fraud in the history of science. “ Circulus Vicious.

Rejection of common dating methods

On archaeological dating methods, Fomenko claims:

“Archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical, and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact, circular, and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century.” — Anatoly Fomenko, History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology 1) [Second edition].

Dendrochronology

Dendrochronology is rejected with a claim that dating objects much older than the oldest still living trees isn’t an absolute but a relative dating method and is thus dependent on traditional chronology. Fomenko specifically points to a break of dendrochronological scales around AD 1000.

The dendrochronological sequences beginning with living trees from various parts of North America and Europe cannot be extended back 12,400 years into the past. Both relative and a fully anchored dendrochronology series going back past 1000 AD are fallacious as based on a non-significant number of samples.

Radiocarbon dating

Fomenko also cites a number of cases where carbon dating of a series of objects of known age gave significantly different dates. He also alleges undue cooperation between physicists and archaeologists in obtaining the dates since most radiocarbon dating labs only accept samples with an age estimate suggested by historians or archaeologists.

Fomenko also claims that carbon dating from AD 1 to 2000 is inaccurate because it has too many sources of error that are either guessed at or completely ignored. That calibration is done with a statistically meaningless number of samples.

Moreover, initial calibrations of the radiocarbon dating method were made in the Arizona University laboratory on wooden samples delivered and dated ad hoc by an archaeological expedition of 1955-57 of the same Arizona University to Sinai, Egypt. Consequently, Fomenko concludes that carbon dating in its present form based on fallacious initial calibration curves is circular and inaccurate enough to be used on the historical scale.

Numismatic dating

Fomenko rejects numismatic dating as circular, based on the traditional chronology, and points to cases of similar coins being minted in distant periods, unexplained long periods with no coins minted, and mismatched numismatic dating with historical accounts.

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article from Wikipedia

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: New Chronology; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

Jesus

October 4, 2017

Hightime to forecast the future based on a consistent history!

New Chronology

The research of earth-moon telluric rotation by the late chief astrophysicist of NASA Robert Russel Newton leads mathematicians of MSU to a breakthrough in the chronology of world history. The timeline of the civilization based exclusively on irrefutably dated events and artifacts shrinks to approximately 1000 years, key events find their true place on the time axis.

The erroneous chronology we live with was essentially crafted by Kabbalist Scaliger and Jesuit Petavius in the XVI-XVII from the contradictory mix of the copies of ancient Latin, Greek, Hebraic and Aramaic manuscripts (all originals have mysteriously disappeared) cemented by the authority of the Church Fathers.

History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

The most probable prototype of the historical Jesus was Andronikos I Komnenos (allegedly AD 1183 to 1185), the Emperor of Byzantine, reflected in the consensual history for his numerous failed reforms; his traits and deeds are reflected in ‘biographies’ of many real and imaginary persons. According to New Chronology, the New Testament is the rendition of religious events of the XIIth century AD.

Crusades of 1189-1192 AD and 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were military operations under the banner of Christianity by the followers and relatives of Jesus alias Emperor Andronicus killed during a religious mutiny. Crusades have ended with the Sack of Constantinople in 1204.

History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2 See Table of Contents

The historical Jesus Christ is a composite figure and reflection of the Bible prophet Elisha, Osiris, the god of death, life, and resurrection, Pope Gregory VII, Saint Basil of Caesarea, and even Li Yuanhao (“Son of Heaven”), Euclides, Dionysius and Andronikos I Komnenos, the emperor of Byzantine.

The seemingly vast differences in the biographies of these figures result from a difference in languages, points of view, and time frame of the authors of said accounts and biographies. The historical Jesus Christ – Andronikos I Komnenos – may have been crucified around 1185 AD on Joshua’s Hill, overlooking the straits of Bosphorus following mutiny caused by the conflict of religious ideas.

If Jesus was born today

Astronomical phenomena reflected in the New Testament as the Star of Bethlehem that coincides with the Crab supernova explosion in 1152 A.D., the full solar eclipse in 1185 A.D. during the alleged Crucifixion support them as key dates in the life of Jesus Christ. The same dates included in the Zodiacs and horoscope of Egyptian Temples relative to Osiris reinforce further the credibility of the advanced key dates.

History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3. See Table of Contents.

The Bible idem the Old Testament was composed in Latin from the Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew sources in XV-XVI representing the events of the XIII – XVII centuries AD in Europe and Byzantine as very ancient ones. The Old Testament contains doctrines, dogmas, axioms, ideas, hints of social order, and “prophecies” about “future” events described in the New Testament.

Excerpts from the Bible were read in Latin to the public by the priests from the pulpits of Catholic Cathedrals. Roman Curia opposed the translation and circulation of the Bible up to the XVII (i.e. Tyndale was burned at a stake). The invention of printing by Gutenberg in 1455 AD led to the availability of the New and Old Testaments all over Europe.

The Bible was translated into European languages and mass distributed starting XVI. The availability of the Gospels and Scriptures in native languages led to the conflict of the interpretations of texts therein contained between the Church and the Bible. The Bible became the main instrument of the Protestant Reformation.

History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4. See Table of Contents.

The New Chronology of religions runs as follows: polytheism followed by monotheism in the pre-Christian period (before the XIth and the figurehead of Jesus Christ), Dionysus-Bacchus Christianity (XIth and XIIth before and after the life of Jesus), Christendom (XIIth to XIVth centuries) and its subsequent mutations into Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism (sic!) and, Islam (sic!) in XIVth to XVIth centuries.

Antiquity as prime Agenda of Europe

By the middle of the XVI century the prime political agenda of Europe that already has reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Empire of Eurasia.

The concerted effort of European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy despite the severe fight with Protestants, humanists, and scientists in the XV-XVII centuries – the creation and dissemination of ideas of the fictional Ancient World and Dark Ages served this agenda perfectly.

The fictional Ancient World that was created by black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists, and scientists served their particular agendas too by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before according to the ancient authorities they invented and the sources they wrote under aliases.

The European aristocracy, i.e. partly fugitives from Byzantine and partly inheritors of the former Eurasian warlords, justified thus their claims of self-rule for their lands, the Roman Curia declared its priority over the orthodoxy of the Evil Empire, Protestants, humanists and scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.

The Breakthrough New Chronology books published in the USA open new perspectives to check the veracity of History by application of mathematics, statistics, and astronomy in the same manner as they were applied to genetics.

Indeed, the time has come to check chronology scientifically as it is the true foundation of history. Moreover, world history must not serve Judeo-Christian, Eurocentric or any other agenda, it must become the rocket science reporting irrefutably the past of homo sapience species.

Axioms of the New Chronology:

Chronology is the basis of history;

History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents;

Human evolution has always been linear, gradual, and irreversible;

History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2. See Table of Contents

The “cyclic” nature of human civilization is a myth; all the gaps, duplicates, Dark Ages, and “renaissances” are fictional;

History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3. See Table of Contents

The geographical knowledge and cartography is a gradual and irreversible process; the closer in time to the events is a manuscript describing them is the fewer distortions it contains;

History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4. See Table of Contents.
History: Fiction of Science?: Slavonic conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)
Starting today from 23:00 to 05:00 Vatican rented from Elon MUSK for 1 billion USD a satellite to measure with lasers the temperature of the population (rectally). Please stick your bottom out of the open window towards the stars. Hold an open ID in your right hand. https://evilempireblog.com/black-death-syphilis

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

If Jesus was born today

Jesus vs. Devil match

Jesus shows up?

Jesus passes the broom?

Secret service of Jesus

Jesus failed miracle

Jesus, at the Nazareth school

Jesus secret operation

Jesus Fake Wine Plot

Jesus, Krishna, and Buddha

Last supper in China

Jesus vs McDonald’s

Jesus menu for People

Jews convert to Christians

More blogs:

Has history been tampered with?

October 4, 2017

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” George Santayana, American philosopher.

History was, is and will be tampered with if not stopped by Science. To boast, to lie, to pretend is a part of the human homo sapiens nature. On one hand, the winners justified the claims they laid to the titles, and lands by alleged ancestry and its glorious deeds. On the other hand, the court historians knew only too well how to please their masters. Continue reading “Has history been tampered with?”

Were human evolution and history tampered with?

October 4, 2017

Yes, world history for the last 600 years.

Yes, human evolution for the last 150 years.

Yes, the manipulation of human evolution accelerated in 2017

History was, is, and will be tampered with if not stopped by Science. To boast, to lie, to pretend is a part of the human homo-sapiens nature. On one hand, the winners justified the claims they laid to the titles, and lands by alleged ancestry and its glorious deeds. On the other hand, the court historians knew only too well how to please their masters. Continue reading “Were human evolution and history tampered with?”

“Evil” Empires

October 4, 2017

“[Historical] revisionism … only means bringing history into accord with facts.” Harry Elmer Barnes (American historian, 1889–1968)

Based on exact sciences correction of chronology leads to the profound reconstruction of world history.

Timeline of “Evil” Empires of Homo Sapiens Sapiens species that is both aggressive and prone to multiplication in geometrical progression

The Civilization of homo sapiens species defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication is fairly young, and fits in a timeframe of barely 1000 years. New Chronology theory doesn’t deny Pyramids, Great Wall of China, and Notre Dame, but points to the more probable datings of events and artifacts on the time axis based on irrefutable data. Consensual chronology of events is refuted as erroneous, subjective and contrary to astronomy, physics, logic and statistics.

Ancient World, Atlantis, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Persia, India, China, Aliens, and ETs we are told about in thousands of books, films, are fantasy. The key dates on the AD time axis based on New Chronology are presumed, and approximate. The climatic periods are irrefutable as based on data from ice core deposits in Greenland. The major movements of populations across the globe are based on billions of DNA samples collected in the last 50 years.

Hypothesis A: The conditions of survival, improved about 10 000 years ago allowing the multiplication of species of homo sapience in geometrical progression. The species began about 500 AD its progress from clans to tribes, to proto-states, to centralized governments, to proto-empires across Eurasia by 1000 AD, that competed for space and resources ending in the formation by 1300 AD of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia that ruled the lands.

Hypothesis B: This Superempire has subsequently disintegrated within the next 300 years due to various speeds of intellectual and technological development into competing parts. Western European part of the “Evil” Empire has overtaken about 1600 intellectually and technologically all other parts, and started their colonization. Moreover, Western Europe has nearly wiped out by the XVIII century in a concerted effort from the memory of peoples of the former “Evil” Empire its very existence.

Hypothesis C: The invention of mills to saw multiple boards from the logs, the invention of navigation instruments, and optical instruments XV-XVII in Western Europe allowed the building of the oceangoing ships. Spain, Portugal, France, Holland, and England started the first industrial revolution, commerce, and overseas colonization. England won this competition growing by the end of the XVIII century from the small underpopulated province to a new “Evil” Empire of Great Britain that ruled the waves until the XX century.

First Epoch: 500 – 800 AD.

According to anthropology the modern species of homo sapience has appeared about 120 000 years ago. Bad or good luck for us, as the Ice Age started about the same time. Very probably, we morphed into homo sapience thanks to the Ice Age. Most of the Northern hemisphere became unfit for our survival.

The Ice Age ended barely 10 000 years ago, and the human hunter-gatherers that survived started to multiply, and form clans and tribes in the deltas of the rivers of the Northern Hemisphere that were propitious for the survival of species.

Ouf! We can survive and multiply at last! Populations practice fluvial agriculture, hunting, and fishing to compete for space and resources. That war our first and last Paradise lasted from 10 000 BC to 500 AD with an average lifespan of 30 years! Civilization as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication is inevitably coming to make our lifespan longer and us cleverer! Fare thee well Paradise! Pre-history of civilization starts in 500 A.D.!

The rising density of populations leads to the formation of social structures due to the selective competition between clans and tribes. The social structures of populations of deltas reach by 500 AD the level of the proto-states with the centralized pyramidal governance. Proto-states compete with each other for space and resources. Now we have resources and spare time to fight our neighbors, to multiply and expand!

We are illiterate heathens and pagans as yet. Multiple Littel Ice Ages from 10 000 BC to 850 BC slowed the proliferation of homo sapience species in Northern and Central Europe but allowed for one in Southern Europe, North Africa, and Asia. Paganism rules. The Pre-history ends and Civilization begins by 800 A.D. with the invention of hieroglyphical writing.

Key Step: From Paganism we move to Polytheism AKA the system of dominant beliefs and worship practices that morph into structured religions.

Breakthrough: by 500 AD humans invent and use non-metal basic instruments, and simple weapons.

Breakthrough: By 800 AD we have just invented and started basic writing with hieroglyphs and cuneiforms that are difficult to learn and use but made registration of events and issues and control of execution of orders of the centralized authority possible.

Key Step: Proto-states in the Deltas of Nile and Euphrates rapidly grow into the Kingdoms that expand to Mare Nostrum shores and to Mesopotamia and fight with each other for space and resources. Civilization starts in 800 A.D.

Key Step: Proto-states in the Deltas of Ganges, Yangtze rapidly grow into the Kingdoms that will expand in India, Southeastern Asia, and China, compete for space and resources to turn into proto-empires.

Breakthrough: Writing with hieroglyphs and cuneiforms on papyri, plaster, textile, clay, stone supports make a centralized rule possible. Proto-states that appear across Eurasia morph with different speed into kingdoms with pyramidal social structure.

The hieroglyphic and cuneiform writing is descriptive and unsuitable for the composition and communication of complicated phrases and long texts. It takes up to 10 years to learn, it is difficult to teach and to use. Nevertheless, it is sufficient for building a pyramidal social structure. Literacy is reserved for scribes and priests that serve the centralized authority.

Second Epoch: 800 – 1000 AD. The Medieval Warm Period of 850-1350 AD begins in the Northern Hemisphere in 850 AD, therefore, the Kingdom of Egypt Kem expands further to the North, to the coastal Mediterranean and Minor Asia. Kem turns into Judea-Israel proto-Empire with the capital Yoros on Bosphorus and founds fiefs in Italy, Spain, France, England, Ireland, Northern Europe.

Jerusalem of 1000 BC, Babilon of 2000 BC, Troy of 3000 BC, Constantinople of 500 AD, and Czar-grad of 1000 AD we told about in the consensual history are alleged and actually are the same placeholder Yoros in Byzantium. The Issue with Troy

Key Step: Monotheism develops. Breakthrough: By 900 AD we learn across Eurasia to make and use iron, steel, copper, bronze and invent the wheel.

Breakthrough: By 900 AD we create alphabetical writing, and invent papyri, and parchment as a support for information. This art of writing is much easier to learn, teach, and use but the cost of parchment and papyri is prohibitive for wide application and the rapid spread of literacy.

All the supports we use at that time for fixing information are expensive and difficult for writing, teaching, and everyday use. The composition of complicated phrases and texts stays difficult. Literature is impossible as yet. The spread of knowledge, technologies, and know-how are still complicated.

All allegedly ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek masterpieces of philosophy, astronomy, mathematics, literature, and sciences were actually written in 1400-1800 AD under glorious aliases to keep the true authors thereof safe from the religious persecutions and inquisition.

Consensual characters of Antiquity: Priam, Helene, Achilles, Hector, Alexander the Great, Darius, Nebuchadnezzar, Euclid, Dionysius, Julius Caesar, Nero, Adrian, Caligula, Constantine, Ptolemy, Pharaoh, Cleopatra, etc..etc. These alleged characters were invented in the framework of the creation of imaginary Antiquity in Europe during the XIII-XVI centuries.

The panopticon of Greek Zeus and Roman Jupiter deities, half and quarter deities, their myths, and legends, deeds of heroes acting in events that reflected events of the early Middle Ages or simply imagined served the agenda of the creation of Antiquity needed to wiggle from under Evil Empire.

Consensual placeholders of Antiquity: Ancient Egypt, Greece, Persia, Babilon, Assyria. The Ancient Kingdom of Rome, Republic of Rome, Roman Empire. Consensual key events: Troy War, Spartan wars, Roman Wars, etc..all are alleged, fictitious, fallacious reflections of events that have actually taken place during 1200-1500 AD in Europe and Minor Asia.

All poems, legends, stories, literature written by allegedly ancient Roman, Greek, Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Indian and Chinese authors, poets, thinkers were ‘found’, AKA written during 1300-1800 under ‘ancient’ aliases. “Antiquity” sculptures and artifacts were mass-produced in Italy in 1500-1800 AD in a widescale operation under the auspices of Medicis & Co.

Third Epoch: 1000 – 1200 AD. Proto-Empire Judea-Israel rules from the capital Yoros (idem Troy, Rome, Constantinople), situated on Bosphorus, and expands into Western, Central and Eastern Europe divided into Thems (fiefdoms). The medieval Warm Period of 850–1350 A.D. has facilitated both agriculture and construction in Europe and Asia.

Overpopulation of Scandinavia in the Medieval Warm Period leads to conquests by Vikings of coastal Northern Europe, the British Isles, Ireland, Island, and Greenland.

The Proto-Empire Judea-Israel is reflected in manuscripts of XIII-XV century AD as Ancient Greece, Persia, Jerusalem, Rome, Troy, Constantinople, Czargrad. Consensual alleged historical characters: Alexander, Pharaoh, Nefertiti, Solomon, Cheops, Mithridates, Atilla, Caesar, Charlemagne, Clovis, King Arthur, Wilhelm the Conqueror, Prince Vladimir, Prince Oleg, Constantine, King Richard, etc..etc; The Issue with Antiquity

Key step: Polytheism transforms into pre-Christian Monotheism bound to split within the next 200 years into conflicting religions of the common Abrahamic root: Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

Breakthrough: We invent the bronze and steel instruments, armor and start shaving. According to metallurgy, bronze is by far more complicated to produce than iron. Therefore all ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek statues of clean-shaven heroes and Emperors were made well after XII century AD.

We discover mathematics, geometry, mechanics, and algebra. We invent primitive and composite concretes and start in the XI century by building aqueducts, cathedrals, roads, and bridges. We build the pyramids in the XIII century according to Fibonacci proportions discovered at that time! We invent by 1100 AD cheap paper in Byzance and start writing with vowels, reading complicated religious texts. We can make drafts, teach, disseminate knowledge.

With the help of non-expensive paper as information support, we can progress much faster. Starting with religious studies we develop literature and poetry, astrology and alchemy that will turn by the XVI century into astronomy and chemistry. Clergy becomes writers and poets, knights compose and sing fine ballads.

We invent the stirrups for cavalry and learn the art to command military formations. The rapid growth of the “Evil” Empire across Europe in the XIII-XIV centuries and across Eurasia within in XV-XVI centuries takes place.

“Evil” Empire of Eurasia established during the XIII-XIV centuries the road and seaway networks over long distances with key points at crossroads that turned into capitals of countries after the Empire disintegrated. This network facilitates the Epidemics of infectious diseases.

Black Death is a reflection of the extremely drastic measures in the XIV-XV centuries undertaken by the “Evil” Empire to prevent further spread of plagues by military operations, isolating and killing populations of infected territories in Europe under pretexts of religious and/or ethnic cleansing.

The invention of cavalry units with stirrups assured the overwhelming superiority and mobility of the “Evil” Empire armies. Due to the conflict of interest between Europe and Asia, due to the intellectual superiority of western Thems (fiefdoms), the subsequent disintegration of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia within the XVI-XVII centuries is inevitable.

Breakthrough: The Invention of cheap paper leads to the spread of alphabetic writing and religious literacy and proto-sciences.

Breakthrough: The translation of Christian texts into vernacular languages leads to the split within Catholic Christianity, the conflict between the Church and the Bible. Roman Curia forbade first English and German translations, burned at stake translators Ian Huss and Tyndall. Old and New Testament in vernacular languages became the base of Protestantism. The small Ice Ages lead to famines and peasant revolts, the sack of monasteries in Northern Europe in the XV-XVI centuries.

Breakthroughs: We start in XI century the Construction of Big Projects, building the 777 Wonders of the World, i.e. Pyramids, Sphinxes, Temples, Obelisks in Egypt, aqueducts, Coliseums, paved roads. The ruins of the Coliseum in Rome were built as late as the XVI century on the order of the Roman Pope!

Hieroglyphic writing is used for religious purposes and for the description of important events of 1200 – 1500 AD and/or religious notions on the walls and columns of temples and palaces in Egypt.

We create a vocabulary of astrological and astronomical symbols which allows the recording of dates of significant events. Most of the symbols are still used in astrology. Dates of crucial events are recorded in zodiacs and horoscopes painted or cut in stones in the Palaces and Temples of Egypt.

Jesus Christ Epoch: Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire of 1200 – 1300 AD. Pre-Christian Monotheism transforms into aggressive Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christianity. Christian Crusades to punish the tormentors of Jesus Christ (Byzantine emperor Andronicus?) are organized by Christians to Constantinople, idem Troy, idem Czar-Grad.

Orthodox Catholic Christianity expands into Western, Central, and Eastern Europe. Christian Empire forms in Russia in the XIII century and by the XIV century, it colonizes Central and Western Europe. “Evil” Empire loses step by step control starting the XVth century. The consensual history describes it in the XV-XVI centuries as the Roman Empire that allegedly lasted from 1000 BC to 500 AD.

Religious literacy, improvement of mathematics, astrology, and alchemy develop. Dozens of religious Universities spring across Western and Central Europe to become in less than a century the hotbeds of education.

Key Breakthrough: Monotheism transforms into Abrahamic pre-Christianity. The invention of cheap paper as information support makes the dissemination of ideas and proto-sciences across Europe and Minor Asia possible.

Key Breakthrough: Writing with vowels makes texts easily readable. Recording information by writing becomes simple. The composition of complicated phrases is simple. Long complicated texts and literature are feasible. Poetry and literature start developing disguised initially as ‘ancient’ Greek and Roman ones.

Key Breakthrough: Teaching to write and read becomes easier. Dissemination of knowledge is facilitated. The speed of proliferation of ideas increases. Conflicts based on different religious ideas of competing currents take place inevitably.

Key Breakthrough: Christianity becomes the prime mover of human civilization. Following a mutiny caused by a conflict of religious ideas, Byzantine Emperor Andronicus – allegedly born in 1152 A.D. in Crimea – is killed (crucified) in 1185 A.D. in Jerusalem idem Constantinople, and buried on the mountain of Beikos.

Pre-Christianity transforms into Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christianity with Emperor Andronicus as the probable prototype of Jesus Christ of the New Testament.

Key Breakthrough: Crusades. Crusade of 1189-1192 AD and Crusade in 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were military operations under the banner of Christianity by the subordinates and relatives of the late Emperor Andronicus. Sack of Constantinople in 1204. Crusades and Exoduses

Key Breakthrough: Religious education expands. Due to the powerful societal potential of the ideas of Christianity, due to the increased speed of proliferation and dissemination of writing and reading, religious literacy and education become possible and spread. Hundreds of Christian monasteries, dozens of sects, schools, universities spring across Minor Asia and Europe.

Key Breakthroughs: Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire. XIII-XIV century AD – Slavic and Turkic Princes of Judea-Israel, blood relatives, and subordinates of Byzantine Emperor Andronicus recreate an Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire with Great Novgorod as its Center. This Empire makes a short-lived conquest of Central and Western Europe.

Great Novgorod consists of Wladimir-Suzdal-Yaroslavl-Kostroma-Moscow Golden Ring cities. Rem: Russian Czars are shown as direct heirs of Jesus on their family tree in Annunciation Cathedral of Kremlin.

Empire of Eurasia Epoch: 1300 – 1500 A.D. Orthodox Catholic Christianity splits into Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Judaic, and Islam currents. The Horde from Pacific to Atlantic. Orthodox Christianity splits further into Apostolic and Regal currents.

The Apostolic Christian part of the imperial ruling dynasty wins the battle of Kulikovo (Moscow) in 1380 AD and founds the city of Mosques – White Moscow.

Regal Christian part pursues its expansion to India, Tibet, and China. Regal Orthodox Christianity morphs into Mithraism, Buddhism, and Krishnaism. The above explains numerous similarities and basic scenarios of life, death, resurrection, origins, phraseology. These eastern religions are the morphs and reflections of Christianity datable by 1300-1500 AD.

Key Breakthroughs: Colonisation of Europe in XIII-XIV century due to military superiority of Empire. Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire colonizes and baptizes Central and Western Europe. Rem: the swords, armor, decorations with Turkic, Slavonic, Arabic, and allegedly illegible inscriptions are kept in European museums and Kremlin.

Rem: manuscript Orthodox Slavonic Bibles used in royal coronation rituals are still kept in the cathedral of Reims, France, and Nikoping, Sweden. Remark: Helmets and armor of Russian Czars kept in Kremlin Armory bear Quran quotes. The Issue with Czar’s Helmet

Key Breakthrough: Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire grows in XIII-XV centuries into a multi-confessional, multilingual centralized, and ruthless “Evil” Empire of Eurasia with citizens strictly divided into hereditary castes: governing, civil, military nobles (Caucasians), transportation, and equine relay network (Gypsies), taxation (Jews, origin of anti-Semitism), Orthodox, Catholic or Muslim clergy of common Abrahamic root. The Issue with Great Tartary

Key Breakthrough: Military superiority of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia. Due to the overwhelming superiority and mobility of cavalry troops, ruthless discipline, superior administration, organization, and communications network in the Evil Empire, the colonization, and control of tribal territories or proto-states was very rapid. An equine relay network run by the caste of Gypsies and a taxation system run by the caste of Jews is set up. “Blood tax”, i.e. conscription of population is enforced. The Issue with Tamerlane

The disintegration of the Evil Empire of Eurasia. 1500-1700 A.D. Key Breakthroughs: Empire of Eurasia rules the lands. The eventual resistance is ruthlessly crushed. The refusal to pay taxes due to the Emperor alias Czar alias Caesar alias Khan is punished by the ‘Tartar-Mongol invasions’.

Evil Empire of Eurasia (Great Tartary) builds castles, fortresses, and road networks for troops, a long-distance equine relay system with transportation speed up to 30 km/hour for governance and trade (horse and horseman are changed in relays). The Empire establishes provincial capitals in the key points of the road network. The Horde from Pacific to Atlantic

The road network of the Empire allows for trade between the Eastern and Western parts of the Empire. The East sells to the West spices, fine tissues, silk, precious and semi-precious stones. The West sells optics, watches, jewelry. Note the resemblance of the word Jew and Jewellery. Jews from the tax collectors caste were not poor.

Key Breakthroughs: Islam. Ottoman Empire. The network of roads and trade between formerly isolated populations across the Evil Empire Eurasia leads to the spread of infectious diseases and plagues. To stop this spread the Ottoman Empire or the southern branch of Great Tartary cuts the supply of spices and silk from the East.

Evil Empire carries through large-scale sanitary and ethnic cleansing military operations in the Balkans and splits into Ottoman and Russ-Horde branches to contain the spread of infectious diseases. Islam splits from Christianity completely. The Issue with Tamerlane

Key Breakthrough: Western European countries of the former Evil Empire: Spain, France, Portugal, Italy, Holland, and England, start building commercial and military maritime fleets to open new trade routes to the East by sailing around Africa and across the Atlantic Ocean. Rule the lands begins to lose to rule the waves!

Key Breakthroughs: Rapid development in Europe. The warlords of the conquering armies of the Evil Empire often stayed as rulers in the colonized countries and made their rights hereditary. The heavy taxation by far away ‘Mongol’ Caesar alias Khan inspired separatist ideas to the heirs of the warlords.

Key Breakthroughs: European Aristocracy. The split of Christianity into Orthodox and Catholic currents prepares the ground for the separation of Europe from the Evil Empire. The heirs of Imperial warlords become English, French, Spanish kings and form a class of European high aristocracy, fight dynastic wars.

Key breakthrough: the heirs of the warlords of Evil Empire that occupied in XIII-XIV centuries Central Europe formed in XV the century the Holy Roman Empire of German People with an Emperor elected by 7 German Princes Electors. Allegedly Roman Pope Leo III was crowned on 25/12/800 the Frankish king Charlemagne as Emperor. The power of the Emperor was limited, princes, lords, bishops, and cities of the empire had de facto independence within their territories.

In fact, this Empire construct was neither Roman nor Holy. Most of the Princes turned Protestant.

Key breakthrough: Emperor Francis II dissolved the empire on 6 August 1806, after the creation of the Confederation of the Rhine by Napoleon. The Empire has the same imperial banner as Russia (sic!).

Court historians invent ‘ancient’ dynasties for the heirs of warlords. The clergy duly explains the divine origin of royal power. Astrologists find abundant confirmations thereof in the sky. Rem: all solar eclipses of the alleged Antiquity described in `ancient` manuscripts turn out to be medieval. Astronomy vs. History

Key Breakthroughs: Gutenberg printing press. Propaganda becomes a major weapon. The invention of the printing press makes the production of cheap multiple copies of documents and charts possible. Immediate application for military, governance, religious, education, and propaganda purposes follow.

Key Breakthrough: The speed of information proliferation and dissemination of the art of writing, teaching, reading, and education increases by the order of magnitude. European ex-provinces of the Evil Empire develop arts, science & technology considerably faster than the ‘Mongolian’ Center too busy with expansion in and control of Eurasia.

Key breakthrough: Columbus discovered the Americas in 1492. Spain and Portugal make important discoveries and conquests in the Americas, Africa, India, and China. They sign in 1494 the Treaty of Tordesillas dividing the globe into two hemispheres dividing Spanish and Portuguese claims. Roman Pope Alexander VI complied and issued a Bull.

Hundreds of monasteries, thousands of schools increase literacy and dozens of universities spread science appear across Minor Asia and Europe. Propaganda becomes a powerful weapon for Europe. World history turns into a weapon of Propaganda. The Apocalypse as seen by Astronomy

Key Breakthrough: “Re-Naissance”. To confirm the divine rights of the new ‘ancient’ ruling class of Europe, the learned people of Renaissance invent in the XIV-XVI century A.D. the history of Ancient Greece, Egypt, Rome and manufacture their paraphernalia eagerly bought by the rich and powerful.

Thousands of learned monks of different orders, white and black clergy, a new class of learned people toil for three centuries to elaborate ‘ancient’ languages, compose literature, philosophy masterpieces under resounding pseudonyms. Rem: artists and sculptors mass produce ‘ancient’ artifacts. The Issue with Antiquity

Key Breakthrough: Development of Science. For their own security, scientists made their discoveries public under fictitious glorious names of ‘ancient’ astronomers and ‘ancient’ philosophers, and under the cover of allegedly pre-diluvian scientific treaties. Astrology turns into astronomy, religion into philosophy, alchemy into chemistry.

Fearful of inquisition, scientists work under pseudonyms. The groundwork of Science is laid. To turn witchcraft into medicine, corpses are stolen and dissected. Anatomy theatres open in universities of Europe. Rem: at last Italian sculptors start to make anatomically correct beautiful `ancient` Greek and Roman sculptures. Dark Ages in Medieval History

Key Breakthrough: Separatism in Europe. After two centuries of ‘Mongol’ yoke, separatism takes hold in Western Europe, which by then has already invented shipbuilding, clocks, powder, guns, paper, printing, telescope and the microscope. Europe overtakes Europe in sciences. The concerted effort of Europe to escape the control of the Evil Empire with its crushing military superiority was inevitable. The Issue with Mongols

Key Breakthrough: Protestantism. German Princes, AKA the heirs of ‘Mongol’ warlords in Germany supported Martin Luther’s reform of the pro-imperial Catholic Church in Protestantism. The Bible is translated into native languages.

Key breakthrough: Little Ice Age that started in the middle of the XVI century led to poor harvest and famine, and to massive pogroms of the Jewish network of imperial taxation. The sack of numerous Catholic cathedrals and monasteries takes place in Germany and England.

Key Breakthrough: The Council of Trent of 1545-1563. Black and white Catholic clergy transform the pro-imperial Orthodox Catholic Church into the Roman Catholic Church. The Julian Calendar is replaced by the Gregorian calendar in 1582. A list of forbidden books is established, books are found and burnt. Jesuits set up the Order of Jesus and run the Inquisition.

Key Breakthroughs: War of Evil Empire Dynasties. Czar Ivan the Terrible (1530-1584) was probably a fictitious character that stood for the compilation of four consecutive competing contenders to the Throne of Empire. European troops assure victories over Judea Kazan Khan and Tartar Khan of Crimea in the dynastic civil war.

The intestine struggle of dynasties during 50 years has decimated over 10,000 high-ranking officers of the Russian Horde armies. That made the re-conquest of rebellious Europe by the “Evil” Empire unfeasible and the ensuing Great Strife in it inevitable. The time of Trouble lasted from 1584 to 1613. Russia suffered the civil war, Polish invasions, and a famine that killed one-third of the population. The Pro-western Dynasty of Romanov took the throne in 1613. The Issue with Ivan the Terrible

Key Breakthrough: a collective memory of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia is erased. Once the disintegration objective is reached, Europe makes a concerted effort to erase the former “Evil” Empire and its very existence from the people’s memory. This effort is supported by the high nobility of Europe who already had their brand new ‘ancient’ history written.

Rem: Jesuit Chronology, which served for 300 years as the immutable basis of world history, is in fact composed by Kabbalist Joseph Scaliger (1585) and perfected by the Jesuit Dionysius Petavius (1627). The Issue with Chronology

Key Breakthrough: A list of forbidden authors is established by Roman Curia and ancient heretics and/or manuscripts are burnt all over Europe. Writings of ‘ancient’ Roman, Greek authors are mass-produced by the Benedictine order, whereby the originals are never found.

Rem: multi-volume collections of ancient Greek and Roman authors appear before original masterpieces of the “ancients” are found, if found at all.

Key Breakthrough: A Great Strife begins in the Empire of Eurasia in 1584. German princes helped the pro-European Romanov dynasty to usurp the throne of the Evil Empire of Eurasia in 1613. The Dynasty of Eurasian Czars is replaced by the pro-European Romanov one.

25 years old Czar Peter went to Europe for the first time in 1697 with a Grand Embassy to seek a settlement with the European monarchs and the Ottoman Empire. Ottoman Empire laid siege on Vienna in In 1683. The ensuing war of Europe with the Empire lasted until 1699. This Embassy was scheduled to take a couple of weeks lasted 2 years and ended in 1699. The King of England William III in concert with Kings of France, Austria, and Holland replaces the Russian Czar Peter with a look-alike agent in order to stop the imminent Russian and Ottoman invasions.

This agent was an officer of the Dutch Ost-India-Company. New Peter mastered both shipbuilding and was a prize duellist. Czar Peter, I came home another man speaking Russian with a German accent. His own family did not recognize him, consequently, he banned his wife to a monastery, disbanded the guard of Streltsy, sent his half-sister Sophia who has supported guards to a monastery. Peter ordered the nobility of boyars to cut beards, smoke tobacco, and dance ballet.

The former provinces of the Evil Empire: China, Japan, Iran, and Ottoman Empires become independent, but stay fiercely anti-European and anti-Romanov. The Ottoman Empire tries to re-conquer Western Europe in 1529 and again in 1683 (sic!); fails dismally both times. The Issue with Ivan the Terrible

Russian Empire of Eurasia Epoch. 1700-1917.

Peter the Great starts to build the New Russian Empire, modernizes his part of the former Evil Empire up to Moscow (city of Mosques), moves the capital from Moscow to St Petersburg.

Emperor Peter beats under Poltava in 1709, the King of Sweden Karl XII – who had the best army in Europe and was another pretender to the Russian throne.

In 1725, Peter the Great leaves a Testament ordering his heirs to make the Russian Empire Great Again. The reign of Empress Elisabeth followed by Empress Catherine the Great is a travesty of the dynasty Peter the Great wanted but failed to found. In 1762, the pseudo Romanovs become the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov German dynasty of Russian (sic!) Czars, sorry, Emperors.

In 1773-1775, the Russian Empire crushes the Great Tartary headed by Pougatchev, the last pretender to the throne of the “Evil” Empire. In 1776-1796, the Russian Empire takes over the lands of the Muscovite Tartary and expands to Siberia, Alaska, and North-Western America, which it can’t control for a long time due to enormous distances and the absence of a fleet. The Testament of Peter the Great.

Timeframe

The timeframe of the civilization, based on New Chronology takes into account only the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artifacts, therefore it shrinks drastically to approximately 1000 years, and the key events are moved to their more probable place on the time axis.

From 500 A.D. to 1200 A.D. humans have invented instruments, arms, agriculture, writing, trade, and industries, the structure of the population morphed from clans, tribes, kingdoms, States into centrally governed Judea-Israel Empire; changing its religious beliefs from paganism and polytheism to Christianity. From 1200 A.D. to 1350 A.D. it transforms into the Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire of Eurasia.

The Medieval Warm Period of 850 A.D. – 1350 A.D. in Northern Europe A.D. helped the accelerated growth of agriculture, construction, trade, and industry. The economic consequences of the Little Ice Age of 1350 A.d.– 1600 A.D. provoked the peasant revolts, Jewish pogroms, the sack of rich Catholic monasteries, the spread of Protestantism, and the beginning of the disintegration of the Empire of Eurasia.

Map of Siberia by Abraham Ortelius (1527-1598). Antwerp, 1584.

Europe separates step by step from the embrace of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia in 1400 – 1600 and splits into competing English, French, German, Spanish kingdoms, and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.

England builds the Royal Navy to rule the waves and turned from a tiny impoverished kingdom into the enormous British Empire where the sun will never set down for Ost and West Indian Companies.

France mutates into a Monarchy that tries to rule Western Europe and competes with Britain, Austria, and Spain on all fronts and in all domains.

The imbroglio of 300 kingdoms of Central Europe stays under Habsburg’s umbrella of the Roman Empire of the German Nation that was neither Roman nor Empire but called itself Holy.

Spain discovered and colonized together with Portugal the Americas, erased local populations and cultures, baptized heathen Aztecs and Incas to the hilt, and freed them from the burden of useless golden pagan decorations.

European provinces develop arts, science & technology considerably faster than ‘Mongolian’ Center too busy with expansion in and control of the Empire of Eurasia.

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Egypt, Rome, Greece, Persia, and Babilon. All parties concerned, i.e. European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists, and scientists had vested interests to support the myths of Antiquity but each of them for their own reasons.

By the middle of the XVIth century the prime political agenda of Western and Central Europe that has reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Evil Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

The concerted effort of the Aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, the Protestants, Humanists, and Scientists in the creation and dissemination of the ideas of the fictional Ancient World and Dark Ages during the XV-XVII centuries served this agenda perfectly.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2 See Table of Contents

The fictional Ancient World served their agendas to claim their particular priorities by representing events of the XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before and themselves as inheritors thereof, according to the Ancient Authorities they invented and confirmed by the sources they created under aliases.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3. See Table of Contents

The fugitives from Byzantine and inheritors of Eurasian warlords became the European aristocracy, and claimed the self-rule of their lands, the Roman Curia declared its priority over the Oriental Orthodoxy of the Evil Empire.

Protestants translated the New and the Old Testament into native languages to ensure the Christians’ independent exercise of their religion without voracious clergy. Humanists and Scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4. See Table of Contents

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Egypt, Rome, Greece, Persia, and Babilon. All parties concerned, i.e. European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists and scientists had each own vested interests and reasons to support the myths of Antiquity.

Christianity originated in the Byzantine Empire in XII century as Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christian Church followed by the subsequent splits, mutations into the competing Orthodox, Catholic, Western, Eastern, and Oriental Christianity, Mithraism, Judaism, Buddism, and Islam.

The Roman Church moved the beginning of Christianity by 1200 years to the past into the imaginary Ancient Rome and the placeholder Jerusalem from Constantinople to Palestine to justify the leadership of Western Christianity and its priority over Oriental Christianity.

Reconstruction of History would require a new concerted united effort on the part of exact sciences like mathematics, physics, chemistry, genetics, etc.. and humanities like archaeology, ancient art, and literature, linguistics, ancient architecture, etc..

At present, such concerted effort of world history reconstruction does not take place due to the comfortable, well-paid position of the mainstream historians staying with a consensual history built on the erroneous chronology manufactured by Kabbalist Scaliger in XVI and polished by Jesuit Petavius in XVII century.

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

“Evil” Empires of the Homo Sapience species

October 4, 2017

“[Historical] revisionism … only means bringing history into accord with facts.” Harry Elmer Barnes (American historian, 1889–1968)

Based on exact sciences, correction of chronology leads to the profound reconstruction of world history.

Timeline of “Evil” Empires of Homo Sapience Sapience species that is both aggressive and prone to multiplication in geometrical progression

The Civilization of homo sapiens species defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication is fairly young, and fits in a timeframe of barely 1000 years. New Chronology theory doesn’t deny Pyramids, Great Wall of China, and Notre Dame, but points to the more probable datings of events and artifacts on the time axis based on irrefutable data. Consensual chronology of events is refuted as erroneous, subjective and contrary to astronomy, physics, logic and statistics.

Homo sapience Evil Empire step by step

Homo sapience species moved step by step from natural selection to intelligent design. It survived the cognitive revolution around 100,000 years ago, the agricultural revolution approximately 10,000 years ago, the societal revolution 1,500 years ago, the scientific revolution 500 years ago, and the industrial revolution 200 years ago. Will this species survive the artificial intelligence and genetic engineering revolutions? During these revolutions, the species multiplied from 2,000,000 to 7.8 billion specimens and caused the massive extinction of plants and animals.
Ancient World, Atlantis, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Persia, India, China, Aliens, and the ETes we are told about in thousands of books and films are fantasy. The key dates on the AD time axis based on New Chronology are presumed and approximate. The climatic periods are irrefutable based on data from ice core deposits in Greenland and Antarctica. The major movements of populations during the last 100,000 years across the globe are registered on haplogroups of billions of DNA samples collected in the last 50 years.

Claim A: The conditions of survival improved about 10,000 years with the end of the Ice Age ago, allowing the multiplication of species of homo sapience in geometrical progression. The species began about 500 AD its consecutive progress from bands of forages to clans, to tribes, to proto-states, to centralized governments, to proto-empires across Eurasia by 1000 AD, that competed for space and resources ending in the formation by 1,300 AD of “Evil” Empire of Eurasia that ruled the lands.

Claim B: This Superempire subsequently disintegrated within the next 300 years due to various speeds of intellectual and technological development in the competing parts. Western European part of the “Evil” Empire, far 2,000 km from the Tsar-Grad (placeholder Rome) from the XV century, started to turn astrology into astronomy, witchcraft into healthcare, and religion into Science and reached superiority in all domains. The placeholder Rome, located in Constantinople, was initially moved in 1300 to Novgorod (Yaroslavl) and moved by 1500 to Moscow.

Claim C: Western Europe, AKA the offspring of the “Mongolian” Horde, managed the deconstruction of Tsar-Grad and started their liberation from the colonization made by their progenitors. The Tsar-Grad was moved in the XVI century from Yaroslavl to Moscow, and the ruling “Mongol” elite was replaced by European puppets. Moreover, by the XVIII century, Western Europe had nearly been wiped out in a concerted effort from the memory of peoples of the former “Evil” Empire its very existence.

Claim D: The invention of mills to saw multiple boards from the logs, navigation instruments, and optical instruments XV-XVII in Western Europe allowed the building of ocean-going ships. Spain, Portugal, France, Holland, and England started the first industrial revolution, commerce, and overseas colonization. England nearly won this competition by the end of the XVIII century, turning from the small underpopulated province of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia that ruled the lands to a new “Evil” Empire of Great Britain that ruled the waves until the XX century.

*First Epoch of Civilization: 500 – 800 AD.***

According to archeo-anthropology, the modern species of homo sapiens appeared about 120 000 years ago. Bad or good luck for us, as the Ice Age started about the same time. We probably morphed into homo sapience and won the competition with other home species thanks to the Ice Age. Most of the Northern hemisphere became unfit for the survival of our species, so we had to move a lot.

The Ice Age ended barely 10 000 years ago, and the human hunter-gatherers that survived started to multiply and form clans and tribes in the deltas of the rivers of the Northern Hemisphere that were promising for species’ survival.

Ouf! We can survive and multiply at last! Populations practice fluvial agriculture, hunting, and fishing to compete for space and resources. That war, our first and last Paradise, lasted from 10,000 BC to 500 AD with an average lifespan of 30 years! Civilization as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication is inevitably coming to make our lifespan longer and us cleverer! Fare thee well, Paradise! The pre-history of Civilization starts in 500 AD!

The rising population density leads to the formation of social structures due to the selective competition between clans and tribes. The social structures of populations of deltas reached by 500 AD the level of the proto-states with centralized pyramidal governance. Proto-states compete with each other for space and resources. Now we have resources and spare time to fight our neighbors, to multiply and expand!

We are illiterate heathens and pagans as of yet. Multiple Little Ice Ages from 10,000 BC to 850 BC slowed the proliferation of homo sapience species in Northern and Central Europe but allowed for one in Southern Europe, North Africa, and Asia. Paganism rules. The Pre-history ends, and Civilization begins in 800 AD with the invention of hieroglyphical writing.

Critical Step: From Paganism, we move to Polytheism, AKA the system of dominant beliefs and worship practices that morph into structured religions.

Breakthrough: by 500 AD, humans invented and used non-metal basic instruments and simple weapons.

Breakthrough: By 800 AD, we had just invented and started basic writing with hieroglyphs and cuneiforms that are difficult to learn and use, but they made registration of events, writing of, and control of execution of orders of the centralized authority feasible.

Critical Step: Proto-states in the Deltas of Ganges and the Yangtze rapidly grew into Kingdoms that expanded in India, Southeastern Asia, and China, competing for space and resources to become proto-empires. Civilization starts in 800 AD.

Breakthrough: Writing with hieroglyphs and cuneiforms on papyri, plaster, textile, clay, and stone supports makes a centralized rule possible. Proto-states that appeared across Eurasia morphed at different speeds into kingdoms with pyramidal social structures.

The hieroglyphic and cuneiform writing is descriptive and unsuitable for composing and communicating complicated phrases and long texts. It takes up to 10 years to learn, and it is difficult to teach and use. Nevertheless, it is sufficient for building a pyramidal social structure. Literacy is reserved for scribes and priests who serve the centralized authority.

Second Epoch: 800 – 1000 AD.

The Medieval Warm Period of 850-1350 AD begins in the Northern Hemisphere in 850 AD; therefore, the Kingdom of Egypt Kem expands further to the North, the coastal Mediterranean, and Minor Asia. Kem turns into proto-Empire Judea-Israel with the capital Yoros on the Bosphorus and establishes fiefs in Italy, Spain, France, England, Ireland, and Northern Europe.

Critical step: Monotheism develops.

Breakthrough: By 900 AD, we learned to make and use iron and copper across Eurasia and invented the wheel.

Breakthrough:

By 900 AD, we created alphabetical writing and invented papyri and parchment as a support for information. This art of writing is much easier to learn, teach, and use, but the cost of parchment and papyri is prohibitive for broad application and the rapid spread of literacy.

All the supports we used for fixing information were expensive and difficult for writing, teaching, and everyday use. The composition of complicated phrases and texts remains difficult, and literature is still impossible. The spread of knowledge, technologies, and know-how is still complex.

All allegedly ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek masterpieces of philosophy, astronomy, mathematics, literature, and sciences were actually written in 1400-1800 AD under glorious aliases Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Thales, Pythagoras, Democritus, Empedokles, Anaxagoras, etc., to keep the true authors thereof safe from religious persecutions and inquisition.

Résultats de recherche d'images pour « ancient gods and goddesses » The panopticon of Greek Zeus and Roman Jupiter deities, half and quarter deities, their myths and legends, deeds of heroes acting in events that reflected events of the early Middle Ages or simply imagined served the agenda of the creation of Antiquity needed to wiggle from under the Evil Empire.

Consensual placeholders of Antiquity: Ancient Egypt, Greece, Persia, Babilon, Assyria. The Ancient Kingdom of Rome, Republic of Rome, Roman Empire. The «ancient» key events, i.e., the Troy War, the Spartan Wars, the Roman Wars, etc., are all alleged, fictitious, fallacious reflections of events that occurred during 1200-1500 AD in Europe and Minor Asia.

All poems, legends, stories, and literature written by allegedly ancient Roman, Greek, Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Indian, and Chinese authors, poets, and thinkers were ‘found,’ AKA, written during 1300-1800 under ‘ancient’ aliases. “Antiquity” sculptures and artifacts were mass-produced in Italy in 1500-1800 AD in a widescale operation under the auspices of Medicis & Co.

Third Epoch: 1000 – 1200 AD.

The Proto-Empire Judea-Israel rules from the capital Yoros (idem Troy, Rome, Constantinople), situated on Bosphorus, and expands into Western, Central, and Eastern Europe divided into Thems (fiefdoms). The medieval Warm Period of 850–1350 AD facilitated agriculture and construction in Europe and Asia.

Overpopulation of Scandinavia in the Medieval Warm Period leads to conquests by Vikings of coastal Northern Europe, the British Isles, Ireland, Iceland, the Mediterranean, and Greenland.

The Proto-Empire Judea-Israel is reflected in manuscripts of the XIV-XVI century A.D., such as Ancient Greece, Persia, Jerusalem, Rome, Troy, Constantinople, and Czargrad. Consensual alleged historical characters: Alexander, Pharaoh, Nefertiti, Solomon, Cheops, Mithridates, Atilla, Caesar, Charlemagne, Clovis, King Arthur, Wilhelm the Conqueror, Prince Vladimir, Prince Oleg, Constantine, King Richard, etc..etc.; The Issue with Antiquity

Critical step: Polytheism transforms into pre-Christian Monotheism, bound to split within the next 200 years into conflicting religions of the common Abrahamic root: Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

Breakthrough: We invented the bronze instruments and started shaving.

According to metallurgy, bronze is far more complicated to produce in important quantities than iron. Roman legion needed 10,000 warriors x 10kg of bronze armaments=10 metric tons. The Bronze Age is a fallacy. Therefore, all ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek statues of clean-shaven heroes and Emperors were made well after the XII century AD.

We discovered mathematics, geometry, mechanics, and algebra. We invented primitive and composite concretes and began in the XI century building of aqueducts, cathedrals, roads, and bridges. We built the pyramids in the XIII century according to Fibonacci proportions discovered at that time! We invented around 1100 AD cheap paper in Byzantium and started writing with vowels and reading complicated religious texts. We can make drafts, teach, and disseminate knowledge.

“[Historical] revisionism … only means bringing history into accord with facts.” Harry Elmer Barnes (American historian, 1889–1968)

Based on exact sciences, the correction of chronology leads to the profound reconstruction of world history.

Timeline of “Evil” Empires of Homo Sapience Sapience species that is both aggressive and prone to multiplication in geometrical progression

The Civilization of homo sapiens species defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication is fairly young, and fits in a timeframe of barely 1,000 years. New Chronology theory doesn’t deny Pyramids, Great Wall of China, and Notre Dame, but points to the more probable datings of events and artifacts on the time axis based on irrefutable data. Consensual chronology of events is refuted as erroneous, subjective and contrary to astronomy, physics, logic and statistics.

Homo sapience Evil Empire step by step

Homo sapience species moved step by step from natural selection to intelligent design. It survived the cognitive revolution around 100,000 years ago, the agricultural revolution approximately 10,000 years ago, the societal revolution 1,500 years ago, the scientific revolution 500 years ago, and the industrial revolution 200 years ago. Will this species survive the artificial intelligence revolution? During these revolutions, the species multiplied from 2,000,000 to 7.8 billion specimens and caused the massive extinction of plants and animals.
Ancient World, Atlantis, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Persia, India, China, Aliens, and the ETies we are told about in thousands of books and films are fantasy. The key dates on the AD time axis based on New Chronology are presumed and approximate. The climatic periods are irrefutable based on data from ice core deposits in Greenland. The major movements of populations worldwide during the last 100,000 years are registered on haplogroups of billions of DNA samples collected in the last 50 years.

Claim A: The conditions of survival improved about 10,000 years ago, allowing the multiplication of species of homo sapience in geometrical progression. The species began about 500 AD its consecutive progress from bands of forages to clans, to tribes, to proto-states, to centralized governments, to proto-empires across Eurasia by 1000 AD, that competed for space and resources ending in the formation by 1,300 AD of “Evil” Empire of Eurasia that ruled the lands.

Claim B: This Superempire disintegrated within the next 300 years due to various intellectual and technological development speeds in the competing parts. The western European part of the “Evil” Empire, far 2,000 km from the Tsar-Grad (placeholder) initially located in so-called Constantinople, was moved to Novgorod (Yaroslavl) to be overtaken step by step by Western Europe in the XVI-XVII century intellectually and technologically. It turned astrology into astronomy, witchcraft into healthcare, and religion into Science.

Claim C: Western Europe, AKA the offspring of the “Mongolian” Horde, managed the deconstruction of Tsar-Grad and started their liberation from the colonization made by their progenitors. The Tsar-Grad was moved in the XVI century from Yaroslavl to Moscow, and the ruling “Mongol” elite was replaced by Western European puppets. Moreover, Western Europe has nearly wiped out by the XVIIIth century in a concerted effort from the memory of peoples of the former “Evil” Empire its very existence.

Claim D: The invention of mills to saw multiple boards from the logs and the invention of navigation instruments and optical instruments XV-XVII in Western Europe allowed the building of ocean-going ships. Spain, Portugal, France, Holland, and England started the first industrial revolution, commerce, and overseas colonization. England nearly won this competition growing by the end of the XVIII century from the small underpopulated province of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia that ruled the lands to a new “Evil” Empire of Great Britain that ruled the waves until the XX century.

*First Epoch of Civilization: 500 – 800 AD.***

The Ice Age ended barely 10,000 years ago, and the human hunter-gatherers that survived started to multiply and form clans and tribes in the deltas of the rivers of the Northern Hemisphere that were promising for species’ survival.

We are illiterate heathens and pagans as of yet. Multiple Little Ice Ages from 10 000 BC to 850 BC slowed the proliferation of homo sapience species in Northern and Central Europe but allowed for one in Southern Europe, North Africa, and Asia. Paganism rules. The pre-history ends, and civilization began by 800 AD with the invention of hieroglyphical writing.

Critical Step: From Paganism, we move to Polytheism, AKA the system of dominant beliefs and worship practices that morph into structured religions.

Breakthrough: by 500 AD, humans invented and used non-metal basic instruments and simple weapons

Critical Step: Proto-states in the Deltas of Nile and Euphrates rapidly grew into Kingdoms that expanded to Mare Nostrum shores and Mesopotamia and fought with each other for space and resources. Proto-states in the Deltas of Ganges and the Yangtze rapidly grew into Kingdoms that expanded in India, Southeastern Asia, and China, competing for space and resources to become proto-empires. Civilization starts in 800 AD.

Second Epoch: 800 – 1000 AD.

The Medieval Warm Period of 850-1350 AD begins in the Northern Hemisphere in 850 AD, therefore, the Kingdom of Egypt Kem expands further to the North, to the coastal Mediterranean and Minor Asia. Kem turns into a Judea-Israel proto-empire with the capital Yoros on the Bosphorus and founds fiefs in Italy, Spain, France, England, Ireland, and Northern Europe.

Critical step: Monotheism develops.

Breakthrough: By 900 AD, we learn across Eurasia to make and use iron and copper, invent the wheel

Breakthrough: By 900 AD, we created alphabetical writing and invented papyri and parchment as a support for information. This art of writing is much easier to learn, teach, and use, but the cost of parchment and papyri is prohibitive for broad application and the rapid spread of literacy.

All the supports we used for fixing information were expensive and difficult for writing, teaching, and everyday use. Compelling complicated phrases and texts remains difficult, and literature is still impossible. The spread of knowledge, technologies, and know-how is still complex.

All allegedly ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek masterpieces of philosophy, astronomy, mathematics, literature, and sciences were actually written in 1400-1800 AD under glorious aliases Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Thales, Pythagoras, Democritus, Empedokles, Anaxagoras, etc., to keep the true authors thereof safe from religious persecutions and inquisition.

The panopticon of Greek Zeus and Roman Jupiter deities, half and quarter deities, their myths, and legends, and deeds of heroes acting in events that reflected events of the early Middle Ages or simply imagined served the agenda of the creation of Antiquity needed to wiggle from under Evil Empire.

Consensual placeholders of Antiquity: Ancient Egypt, Greece, Persia, Babilon, Assyria. The Ancient Kingdom of Rome, Republic of Rome, Roman Empire. The «ancient» key events, i.e., the Troy War, the Spartan Wars, the Roman Wars, etc., are alleged, fictitious, fallacious reflections of events that occurred during 1200-1500 AD in Europe and Minor Asia.

All poems, legends, stories, and literature written by allegedly ancient Roman, Greek, Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Indian, and Chinese authors, poets, and thinkers were ‘found’, AKA written during 1300-1800 under ‘ancient’ aliases. “Antiquity” sculptures and artifacts were mass-produced in Italy in 1500-1800 AD in a widescale operation under the auspices of Medicis & Co.

Third Epoch: 1000 – 1200 AD.

Overpopulation of Scandinavia in the Medieval Warm Period leads to conquests by Vikings of coastal Northern Europe, the British Isles, Ireland, Iceland, the Mediterranean, and Greenland.

Breakthrough: We invented the bronze instruments and started shaving.

According to metallurgy, bronze is by far more complicated to produce in important quantities than iron. One Roman legion needed 10,000 x 10kg. The Bronze Age is a fallacy. Therefore, all ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek statues of clean-shaven heroes and Emperors were made well after the XII century AD.

We discovered mathematics, geometry, mechanics, and algebra. We invented primitive and composite concretes and began building aqueducts, cathedrals, roads, and bridges in the XI century. We built the pyramids in the XIII century according to Fibonacci proportions discovered at that time! We invented by 1,100 AD cheap paper in Byzantium and started writing with vowels and reading complicated religious texts. We can make drafts, teach, and disseminate knowledge.

We can progress much faster with the help of non-expensive paper as information support. Starting with religious studies, we developed literature and poetry, astrology, and alchemy that would turn into astronomy and chemistry by the XVI century. Clergy became writers and poets, and knights composed and sang fine ballads.

We invented the stirrups for cavalry and learned the art of commanding military formations. The rapid growth of the “Evil” Empire across Europe in the XIII-XIV centuries and across Eurasia within the XV-XVI centuries occurred.

The “Evil” Empire of Eurasia was established during the XIII-XIV centuries as the road and seaway networks over long distances with crucial points at crossroads that turned into capitals of countries after the Empire disintegrated. This network facilitates the Epidemics of infectious diseases.

Black Death is a reflection of the extremely drastic quarantine measures in the XIV-XV centuries undertaken by the “Evil” Empire to prevent the further spread of plagues by military operations, isolating and killing populations of infected territories in Europe under pretexts of religious and/or ethnic cleansing.

Black Death reflects the extremely drastic quarantine measures in XIV-XV centuries undertaken by the “Evil” Empire to prevent the further spread of plagues by military operations, isolating and killing populations of infected territories in Europe under pretexts of religious and/or ethnic cleansing.

Breakthrough: The invention of cheap paper led to the spread of alphabetic writing, religious literacy, and proto-sciences.

Breakthrough: Translating Christian texts into vernacular languages leads to the split within Catholic Christianity, the conflict between the Church and the Bible. Roman Curia forbade first English and German translations and burned translators Ian Huss and Tyndall at stake. Old and New Testaments in vernacular languages became the base of Protestantism. Little Ice Ages led to famines, peasant revolts, and the sack of monasteries in Northern Europe in the XV-XVI centuries.

Breakthroughs: We started in the XI century the Construction of Big Projects, building the 777 Wonders of the World, i.e., Pyramids, Sphinxes, Temples, Obelisks in Egypt, aqueducts, Coliseums, paved roads. The ruins of the Coliseum in Rome were built as late as the XVI century on the order of the Roman Pope!

Hieroglyphic writing is used for religious purposes and to describe important events of 1,200 – 1,500 AD and/or religious notions on the walls and columns of temples and palaces in Egypt.

We create a vocabulary of astrological and astronomical symbols that allow the recording of dates of significant events. Most of the symbols are still used in astrology. Dates of crucial events are recorded in zodiacs and horoscopes painted or cut in stones in the Palaces and Temples of Egypt.

Fourth Epoch of 1200 – 1300 AD

Jesus Christ. Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire. Pre-Christian Monotheism transforms into aggressive Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christianity. Christian Crusades to punish the tormentors of Jesus Christ (Byzantine Emperor Andronicus?) are organized by Christians to Constantinople, idem Troy, idem Czar-Grad.

Orthodox Catholic Cafolic Christianity expands into Western, Central, and Eastern Europe. The Christian Empire formed in Russia in the XIII century, and by the XIV century, it had colonized Central and Western Europe. The warlords of the Christian Empire turn within 3-4 generations from its vassals into Kings. “The evil” Empire loses step-by-step control starting in the XVth century. The consensual history will describe it in the XV-XVI centuries as the Roman Empire that allegedly lasted from 1,000 BC to 500 AD.

Religious literacy, improvement of mathematics, astrology, and alchemy develop. Dozens of religious Universities spring across Western and Central Europe to become the hotbeds of education and proto-sciences in less than a century.

Pivotal Breakthrough:

Monotheism transforms into Abrahamic pre-Christianity. The invention of cheap paper as information support makes disseminating ideas and proto-sciences across Europe and Minor Asia possible.

Key Breakthrough: Writing with vowels makes texts easily readable. Recording information by writing becomes simple. The composition of complicated phrases is simple. Long, complicated texts and literature are feasible. Poetry and literature started developing, initially disguised as ‘ancient’ Greek and Roman.

Key Breakthrough: Teaching to write and read becomes easier. Dissemination of knowledge is facilitated—the speed of the proliferation of ideas increases. Conflicts based on different religious ideas of competing currents take place inevitably.

Key Breakthrough: Christianity becomes the prime mover of Human Civilization. Following a mutiny caused by a conflict of religious ideas, Byzantine Emperor Andronicus – allegedly born in 1152 A.D. in Crimea – is killed (crucified) in 1185 A.D. in Jerusalem idem Constantinople and buried on the mountain of Beikos. Pre-Christianity transforms into Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christianity with Emperor Andronicus as the probable prototype of Jesus Christ of the New Testament.

Key Events.

The Crusades of 1189-1192 AD and the Crusades in 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were military operations under the banner of Christianity by the subordinates and relatives of the late Emperor Andronicus. Sack of Constantinople in 1204. Crusades and Exoduses

Key Breakthrough: Religious education expands. Due to the powerful societal potential of the ideas of Christianity and the increased speed of proliferation and dissemination of writing and reading, religious literacy and education became possible and spread. Hundreds of Christian monasteries, dozens of sects, schools, and universities spring across Minor Asia and Europe.

Key Events:

Religious education expands. Due to the powerful societal potential of the ideas of Christianity and the increased speed of proliferation and dissemination of writing and reading, religious literacy and education became possible and spread. Hundreds of Christian monasteries, dozens of sects, schools,

Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire. XIII-XIV century A.D. – Slavic and Turkic Princes of Judea-Israel, blood relatives, and subordinates of Byzantine Emperor Andronicus recreate an Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire with Great Novgorod as its Center. This Empire made a short-lived conquest of Central and Western Europe and disintegrated within 200 years.

Great Novgorod consists of Wladimir-Suzdal-Yaroslavl-Kostroma-Moscow Golden Ring cities. Rem: Russian Czars are shown as direct heirs of Jesus on their family tree in the Annunciation Cathedral of the Kremlin.

Fifth Epoch of 1300 – 1450 AD

Short-lived Empire of Eurasia.

Orthodox Catholic Cafolic Christianity splits into Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Judaic, and Islam currents. The Horde from Pacific to Atlantic. Orthodox Christianity splits further into Apostolic and Regal currents.

The Apostolic Christian part of the imperial ruling dynasty with the capital Great Novgorod consisting of Wladimir-Suzdal-Yaroslavl-Kostroma won the battle of Kulikovo (Moscow) in 1380 AD and founds in 1450 the city of Mosques – White Moscow.

Regal Christian is pursuing expansion to India, Tibet, and China.

Regal Orthodox Christianity morphs into Mithraism, Buddhism, and Krishnaism. The above explains numerous similarities and basic scenarios of life, death, resurrection, origins, and phraseology. These eastern religions are the morphs and reflections of Christianity datable by 1300-1450 AD.

Key Events: The colonization of Europe in the XIII-XIV century due to the military superiority of the Empire. The Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire colonized and baptized Central and Western Europe. Rem: the swords, armor, and decorations with Turkic, Slavonic, Arabic, and allegedly illegible inscriptions are kept in European museums and the Kremlin.

Rem: manuscript Orthodox Slavonic Bibles used in royal coronation rituals are still kept in the cathedrals of Reims, France, and Nikoping, Sweden. Remark: Helmets and armor of Russian Czars kept in the Kremlin Armory bear Quran quotes. The Issue with Czar’s Helmet

Key structures: The Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire grew in the XIII-XV centuries into a multi-confessional, multilingual, centralized, and ruthless “Evil” Empire of Eurasia with citizens strictly divided into hereditary castes: governing, civil, military nobles (Caucasians), transportation, and equine relay network (Gypsies), taxation (Jews, origin of anti-Semitism), Orthodox, Catholic or Muslim clergy of common Abrahamic root. The Issue with Great Tartary

The military superiority of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia. Due to the overwhelming superiority and mobility of cavalry troops, ruthless discipline, superior administration, organization, and communications network in the “Evil” Empire, the colonization and control of tribal territories or proto-states was very rapid. An equine relay network run by the caste of Gypsies and a taxation system run by the caste of Jews is set up. “Blood tax,” i.e., conscription of the population is enforced. The Issue with Tamerlane

The sixth epoch of 1450-1700 AD

The disintegration of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia. The Empire of Eurasia rules the lands. The eventual resistance is ruthlessly crushed. The refusal to pay taxes due to the Emperor alias Czar alias Caesar alias Khan is punished by the ‘Tartar-Mongol invasions’.

Evil Empire of Eurasia (Great Tartary) builds castles, fortresses, and road networks for troops and a long-distance equine relay system with transportation speeds up to 20 km/hour for governance and trade (horse and horseman are changed in relays). The Empire establishes provincial capitals at the key points of the road network. The Horde from Pacific to Atlantic

The Empire’s road network allowed for trade between the Eastern and Western parts of the Empire. The East sells spices, fine tissues, silk, and precious and semi-precious stones to the West. The West sells optics, watches, and jewelry. Note the resemblance of the words Jew and Jewellery. Jews of the tax collectors’ caste were not poor and lived in provincial capitals.

Key Events: The network of roads and trade between formerly isolated populations across the Evil Empire of Eurasia leads to the spread of infectious diseases and plagues. To stop this spread, the Ottoman Empire or the southern branch of Great Tartary cuts the supply of spices and silk from the East.

Evil Empire carries through the large-scale sanitary and ethnic cleansing military operations in the Balkans and splits into Ottoman and Russ-Horde branches to contain the spread of infectious diseases. Islam splits from Christianity completely. The Issue with Tamerlane

How Europe Escaped from Eurasia

Step 1. First industrial revolution.

Due to the “stimulating” Little Ice Age of 1400-1700 AD, the Western and Central European former provinces of the “Evil Empire”: Italy, Germany, Holland, England, France, Spain, and Portugal, started the first industrial revolution. They harness water and wind power. They built mills to grind the grain, saw the boards, and spin tissues. They invent furnaces to make steel from pig iron and bronze from copper. They invent powder and guns. They invent standard burnt bricks. Best of all, they invented a time-measuring device clock. The irrefutable dates of the above inventions allow for the dating of alleged events in the history of human civilization.

Step 2. First ideological revolution.

By 1450 AD, the split of Orthodox-Catholic-Cafolic Christianity into Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Judaic, and Islam currents of Avraamic root became a fait accompli. Catholic branch with headquarters in Rome declared itself the most ancient and, therefore, the only true one.

To do so, the Roman Curia composed, with the willing help of black and white learned clergy and humanists who became scientists, the myth of the Roman Empire. Roman Curia refuted Yoros, i.e., Constantinople, as the place of origin of Orthodox-Catholic Christianity.

Example:

If you place the architectural monuments of Rome on a timeline, per the official dates of their construction, then between the 4th and 14th centuries, one sees a void of 1000 years.

According to official consensual history, in Rome, buildings, Colosseum excepted, were not preserved from the end of Antiquity to the beginning of the Renaissance. There has not been built a single monument in 10 centuries, not even ruins! AKA Colosseum is an artificial ruin made of standard bricks.

We are told that all the Roman ruins are very ancient structures, and all the Middle Ages buildings were either burned down, destroyed by barbarians, or rebuilt with standard brick, which was used in Europe and around the world only from the 15th century (sic!).

Step 3. First scientific revolution.

Key Breakthrough: Development of Science. For their own security, scientists made their discoveries public under fictitious glorious names of ‘ancient’ astronomers and ‘ancient’ philosophers and under the cover of allegedly pre-diluvian scientific treaties. Astrology turns into astronomy, religion into philosophy, and alchemy into chemistry.

Fearful of inquisition, scientists work under pseudonyms. The groundwork of Science is laid. To turn witchcraft into medicine, corpses are stolen and dissected. Anatomy theatres open in universities in Europe. Rem: Italian sculptors finally started to make anatomically correct beautiful `ancient` Greek and Roman sculptures. Dark Ages in Medieval History

Hundreds of monasteries and thousands of schools increased literacy, and dozens of universities spread science across Minor Asia and Europe. Propaganda becomes a powerful weapon for Europe. World history turns into a weapon of Propaganda. The Apocalypse as seen by Astronomy

Key Breakthrough: “Re-Naissance.”

To confirm the divine rights of the new ‘ancient’ ruling class of Europe, the learned people of the Renaissance invented the history of Ancient Greece, Egypt, and Rome in the XIV-XVI century A.D. They manufactured their paraphernalia eagerly bought by the rich and powerful.

Thousands of learned monks of different orders, white and black clergy, and a new class of learned people toil for three centuries to elaborate ‘ancient’ languages and compose literature and philosophy masterpieces under resounding pseudonyms. Rem: artists and sculptors mass produce ‘ancient’ artifacts. The Issue with Antiquity

Key Breakthrough: Western European countries of the former “Evil” Empire, i.e., Spain, France, Portugal, Italy, Holland, and England, started building commercial and military maritime fleets to open new trade routes to the East by sailing around Africa and across the Atlantic Ocean. Rule the lands begins to lose to rule the waves motto!

Key Breakthroughs: Rapid development in Europe. The warlords of the conquering armies of the “Evil” Empire often stayed as rulers in the colonized countries and made their rights hereditary. The heavy taxation by far away ‘Mongol’ Caesar alias Khan inspired separatist ideas for the heirs of the warlords.

Key Breakthroughs: European Aristocracy. The split of Christianity into Orthodox and Catholic currents prepares the ground for the separation of Europe from the “Evil” Empire. The heirs of Imperial warlords became English, French, and Spanish kings, formed a class of European high aristocracy, and fought dynastic wars.

To start with, all inventions of the First industrial revolution were declared to have been made in the Roman Empire, with the capital in Rome, Italy but forgotten during 1000 years of the Dark Ages to be rediscovered in Renaissance.

Key breakthrough: the heirs of the warlords of the “Evil” Empire that occupied in XIII-XIV centuries Central Europe formed in XV the century the Holy Roman Empire of German Nation (RIGN) with an Emperor elected by 7 German Princes Electors. Allegedly Roman Pope Leo III was crowned 25/12/800 the Frankish king Charlemagne as Emperor. The power of the Emperor was limited. Princes, lords, bishops, and cities of the empire had de facto independence within their territories.

In fact, this Empire construct was neither Roman nor Holy. Most of the Princes turned Protestant.

Key breakthrough: Emperor Francis II dissolved the empire on 6 August 1806, after Napoleon created the Confederation of the Rhine. The Empire has the same imperial banner as the Russian Empire (sic!).

Court historians invent ‘ancient’ dynasties for the heirs of warlords. The clergy duly explains the divine origin of royal power. Astrologists find abundant “confirmations” thereof in the sky. Rem: all solar eclipses of the alleged Antiquity described in `ancient` manuscripts turn out to be medieval. Astronomy vs. History

Key Breakthrough: The speed of information proliferation and dissemination of the art of writing, teaching, reading, and education increases by the order of magnitude. European ex-provinces of the “Evil” Empire developed arts, science & technology considerably faster than the ‘Mongolian’ Center, which was too busy with expansion in and control of Eurasia.

Key breakthrough: Columbus discovered the Americas in 1492. Spain and Portugal make important discoveries and conquests in the Americas, Africa, India, and China. They signed 1494 the Treaty of Tordesillas, dividing the globe into two hemispheres and dividing Spanish and Portuguese claims. Roman Pope Alexander VI complied and issued a Bull.

The concerted effort of Europe to escape the control of the Evil Empire with its crushing military superiority was inevitable. The Issue with Mongols

Key Breakthrough: Protestantism. German Princes, AKA the heirs of ‘Mongol’ warlords in Germany, supported Martin Luther’s reform of the pro-imperial Catholic Church in Protestantism. The Bible was translated into native languages.

Key breakthrough: The Little Ice Age that started in the middle of the XVI century led to poor harvest and famine and to massive pogroms of the Jewish network of imperial taxation. The sack of numerous Catholic cathedrals and monasteries took place in Germany and England.

Key Breakthrough: The Council of Trent of 1545-1563. Black and white Catholic clergy transform the pro-imperial Orthodox Catholic Church into the Roman Catholic Church. The Julian Calendar was replaced by the Gregorian calendar in 1582. A list of forbidden books is established, and books are found and burnt. Jesuits set up the Order of Jesus and ran the Inquisition.

Key Breakthroughs: War of Evil Empire Dynasties. Czar Ivan the Terrible (1530-1584) was probably a fictitious character that comprised four consecutive competing contenders to the Throne of Empire. European troops assure victories over Judea-Izrael Kazan Khan and Tartar Khan of Crimea in the dynastic civil war.

The intestine struggle of dynasties over 50 years has decimated over 10,000 high-ranking officers of the Russian Horde armies. That made the re-conquest of rebellious Europe by the “Evil” Empire unfeasible and the ensuing Great Strife in it inevitable. The Time of Troubles lasted from 1584 to 1613. Russia suffered a civil war, Polish invasions, and a famine that killed one-third of the population. The Pro-western Dynasty of Romanov took the throne in 1613. The Issue with Ivan the Terrible

Key Breakthrough: a collective memory of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia is erased. Once the disintegration objective is reached, Europe makes a concerted effort to erase the former “Evil” Empire and its very existence from the people’s memory. This effort is supported by the high nobility of Europe, who already had their brand new ‘ancient’ history written for it.

Rem: Jesuit Chronology, which served for 300 years as the immutable basis of world history, is, in fact, composed by Kabbalist Joseph Scaliger (1585) and perfected by the Jesuit Dionysius Petavius (1627). The Issue with Chronology

Key Breakthrough: A list of forbidden authors was established by Roman Curia, and ancient heretics and/or manuscripts were burnt all over Europe. Writings of ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek authors are mass-produced by the Benedictine order, whereby the originals are never found.

Rem: multi-volume collections of ancient Greek and Roman authors appear before original masterpieces of the “ancients” are found, if found at all.

Key Breakthrough: A Great Strife began in the Empire of Eurasia in 1584. German princes helped the pro-European Romanov dynasty to usurp the throne of the Evil Empire of Eurasia in 1613. The Dynasty of Eurasian Czars is replaced by the pro-European Romanov one.

Czar Peter, 25 years old, went to Europe for the first time in 1697 with a Grand Embassy to seek a settlement with the European monarchs and the Ottoman Empire. Ottoman Empire laid siege on Vienna in 1683. The ensuing war of Europe with the Empire lasted until 1699. This Embassy was scheduled to take a couple of weeks, lasted 2 years, and ended in 1699. The King of England, William III, in concert with the Kings of France, Austria, and Holland, replaced the Russian Czar Peter with a look-alike agent to stop the imminent Russian and Ottoman invasions.

This agent was an officer of the Dutch Ost-India Company. New Peter mastered both shipbuilding and was a prize duellist. Czar Peter First came home as another man speaking Russian with a German accent. His own family did not recognize him, consequently, he placed his wife in a monastery, disbanded the guard of Streltsy, and sent his half-sister Sophia who supported guards, to a monastery. Peter ordered the nobility of boyars to cut beards, smoke tobacco, and dance ballet.

The former provinces of the Evil Empire, i.e., China, Japan, Iran, and Ottoman Empires, became independent but stayed fiercely anti-European and anti-Romanov. The Ottoman Empire tried to re-conquer Western Europe in 1529 and again in 1683 (sic!); failed dismally both times. The Issue with Ivan the Terrible

Russian Empire of Eurasia Epoch. 1700-1917.

Peter the Great started to build the New Russian Empire, modernized his part of the former Evil Empire up to Moscow (city of Mosques), and moved the capital from Moscow to St Petersburg.

Emperor Peter beat under Poltava in 1709, the King of Sweden, Karl XII – who had the best army in Europe and was a legal pretender to the Russian throne.

In 1725, Peter the Great left a Testament ordering his heirs to make the Russian Empire Great Again. The reign of Empress Elisabeth, followed by Empress Catherine the Great, is a travesty of the dynasty Peter the Great wanted to found but failed to do so. In 1762, the pseudo-Romanovs became the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov German dynasty of Russian (sic!) Czars, sorry, Emperors.

In 1773-1775, the Russian Empire crushed the Great Tartary headed by Pougatchev, the last pretender to the throne of the “Evil” Empire. In 1776-1796, the Russian Empire took over the lands of the Muscovite Tartary and expanded to Siberia, Alaska, and North-Western America, which it couldn’t control for a long time due to enormous distances and the absence of a fleet. The Testament of Peter the Great.

Timeframe

The timeframe of the civilization, based on New Chronology takes into account only the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artifacts, therefore, it shrinks drastically to approximately 1000 years, and the key events are moved to their more probable place on the time axis.

From 500 A.D. to 1200 A.D., humans invented instruments, arms, agriculture, writing, trade, and industries, and the structure of the population morphed from clans, tribes, kingdoms, and States into centrally governed Judea-Israel Empire, changing its religious beliefs from paganism and polytheism to Christianity. From 1200 A.D. to 1350 A.D., it transforms into the Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire.

The Medieval Warm Period of 850 A.D. – 1350 A.D. in Northern Europe A.D. helped the accelerated growth of agriculture, construction, trade, and industry. The economic consequences of the Little Ice Age of 1400 A.D.– 1700 A.D. provoked the peasant revolts, Jewish pogroms, the sack of rich Catholic monasteries, the spread of Protestantism, and the complete disintegration of the Empire of Eurasia.

Europe separated step by step from the embrace of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia in 1400 – 1700 and split into competing English, French, German, and Spanish kingdoms and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.

England built the Royal Navy to rule the waves and turned from a tiny, impoverished kingdom into the enormous British Empire where the sun will never set down for Ost and West Indian Companies.

France mutated into a Monarchy that tried to rule Western Europe and competed with Britain, Austria, and Spain on all fronts and domains.

The imbroglio of 300 kingdoms of Central Europe stayed under Habsburg’s umbrella of the Empire of the German Nation that was neither Roman nor Holy.

Spain discovered and colonized, together with Portugal and the Americas, erased local populations and cultures, baptized heathen Aztecs and Incas to the hilt, and freed them from the burden of useless golden pagan decorations.

European provinces developed arts, science & technology considerably faster than the ‘Mongolian’ Center, which was too busy expanding in and controlling the Empire of Eurasia.

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Egypt, the Roman Empire, Greece, Persia, and Babilon. All parties concerned, i.e., European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists, and scientists, had vested interests in supporting the myths of Antiquity, but each of them for their own reasons.

By the middle of the XVIth century, the prime political agenda of Western and Central Europe, which had reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Evil Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised, Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

The concerted effort of the Aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, the Protestants, Humanists, and Scientists in creating and disseminating the ideas of the fictional Ancient World and Dark Ages during the XV-XVII centuries served this agenda perfectly.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2 See Table of Contents

The fictional Ancient World served their agendas to claim their particular priorities by representing events of the XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before and themselves as inheritors thereof, according to the Ancient Authorities they invented and confirmed by the sources they created under aliases.

The fugitives from Byzantine and inheritors of Eurasian warlords became the European aristocracy and claimed the self-rule of their lands. The Roman Curia declared its priority over the Oriental Orthodoxy of the Evil Empire.

Protestants translated the New and the Old Testaments into native languages to ensure the Christians’ independent exercise of their religion without voracious clergy. Humanists and Scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

See Table of Contents

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Egypt, Rome, Greece, Persia, and Babilon. All parties concerned, i.e., European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists, and scientists, had their own vested interests and reasons to support the myths of Antiquity.

The Roman Church moved the beginning of Christianity 1200 years into the Past into the imaginary Ancient Rome and the placeholder Jerusalem from Constantinople to Palestine to justify the leadership of Western Christianity and its priority over Oriental Christianity.

Reconstruction of History would require a new, concerted, united effort on the part of exact sciences like mathematics, physics, chemistry, genetics, etc.. and humanities like archaeology, ancient art, literature, linguistics, ancient architecture, etc.

Has history been tampered with ?

We invent the stirrups for cavalry and learn the art of commanding military formations. The rapid growth of the “Evil” Empire across Europe in the XIII-XIV centuries and across Eurasia within the XV-XVI centuries occurred.

The “Evil” Empire of Eurasia was established during the XIII-XIV centuries and created the road and seaway networks over long distances with key points at crossroads that turned into capitals of countries after the Empire disintegrated. This network facilitates the Epidemics of infectious diseases.

The invention of cavalry units with stirrups assured the overwhelming superiority and mobility of the “Evil” Empire armies. Due to the conflict of interest between Europe and Asia and the intellectual superiority of Western thems (fiefdoms), the subsequent disintegration of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia within the XVI-XVII centuries was inevitable.

Breakthrough: The invention of cheap paper led to the spread of alphabetic writing, religious literacy, and proto-sciences.

Breakthrough: Translating Christian texts into vernacular languages leads to the split within Catholic Christianity, the conflict between the Church and the Bible. Roman Curia forbade first English and German translations and burned translators Ian Huss and Tyndall at stake. Old and New Testaments in vernacular languages became the base of Protestantism. The Little Ice Ages led to famines, peasant revolts, and the sack of monasteries in Northern Europe in the XV-XVI centuries.

Breakthroughs: We started in the XI century the Construction of Big Projects, building the 777 Wonders of the World, i.e., Pyramids, Sphinxes, Temples, Obelisks in Egypt, aqueducts, Coliseums, paved roads. The ruins of the Coliseum in Rome were built as late as the XVI century on the order of the Roman Pope!

Hieroglyphic writing is used for religious purposes and to describe important events of 1200 – 1500 AD and/or religious notions on the walls and columns of temples and palaces in Egypt.

We create a vocabulary of astrological and astronomical symbols that allow the recording of dates of significant events.

Most of the symbols are still used in astrology. Dates of crucial events are recorded in zodiacs and horoscopes painted or cut in stones in the Palaces and Temples of Egypt.

Fourth Epoch of 1200 – 1300 AD

Jesus Christ. Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire. Pre-Christian Monotheism transforms into aggressive Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christianity. Christian Crusades to punish the tormentors of Jesus Christ (Byzantine emperor Andronicus?) were organized by Christians to Constantinople, idem Troy, idem Czar-Grad.

Orthodox Catholic Christianity expands into Western, Central, and Eastern Europe. The Christian Empire formed in Russia in the XIII century, and by the XIV century, it had colonized Central and Western Europe. The warlords of the Christian Empire turn within 3-4 generations from its vassals into Kings. “Evil” Empire loses step-by-step control starting in the XVth century. The consensual history will describe it in the XV-XVI centuries as the Roman Empire that allegedly lasted from 1000 BC to 500 AD.

Religious literacy, improvement of mathematics, astrology, and alchemy develop. Dozens of religious Universities spring across Western and Central Europe to become, in less than a century, the hotbeds of education and proto-sciences.

Key Breakthrough: Writing with vowels makes texts easily readable. Recording information by writing becomes simple. The composition of complicated phrases is simple. Long, complicated texts and literature are feasible. Poetry and literature started developing, initially disguised as ‘ancient’ Greek and Roman.

Key Breakthrough: Teaching to write and read becomes easier. Dissemination of knowledge is facilitated. The speed of the proliferation of ideas increases. Conflicts based on different religious ideas of competing currents take place inevitably.

Pre-Christianity transforms into Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christianity with Emperor Andronicus as the probable prototype of Jesus Christ of the New Testament.

Key Breakthrough: Crusades. The Crusades of 1189-1192 AD and 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were military operations under the banner of Christianity by the subordinates and relatives of the late Emperor Andronicus. Sack of Constantinople in 1204. Crusades and Exoduses

Key Breakthrough: Religious education expands. Due to the powerful societal potential of the ideas of Christianity, due to the increased speed of proliferation and dissemination of writing and reading, religious literacy and education became possible and spread. Hundreds of Christian monasteries, dozens of sects, schools, and universities spring across Minor Asia and Europe.

Key Breakthroughs: Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire. XIII-XIV century AD – Slavic and Turkic Princes of Judea-Israel, blood relatives, and subordinates of Byzantine Emperor Andronicus recreate an Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire with Great Novgorod as its Center. This Empire made a short-lived conquest of Central and Western Europe and disintegrated within 100 years.

Fifth Epoch of 1300 – 1450 AD

Short-lived Empire of Eurasia. Orthodox Catholic Christianity splits into Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Judaic, and Islam currents. The Horde from Pacific to Atlantic. Orthodox Christianity splits further into Apostolic and Regal currents.

The Apostolic Christian part of the imperial ruling dynasty won the battle of Kulikovo (Moscow) in 1380 AD and founded the city of Mosques – White Moscow.

Regal Christian is pursuing expansion to India, Tibet, and China.

Key Breakthroughs: The colonization of Europe in the XIII-XIV century due to the military superiority of the Empire. The Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire colonized and baptized Central and Western Europe. Rem: the swords, armor, and decorations with Turkic, Slavonic, Arabic, and allegedly illegible inscriptions are kept in European museums and the Kremlin.

Rem: manuscript Orthodox Slavonic Bibles used in royal coronation rituals are still kept in the cathedrals of Reims, France, and Nikoping, Sweden. Remark: Helmets and armor of Russian Czars kept in the Kremlin Armory bear Quran quotes. The Issue with Czar’s Helmet

Key Breakthrough: The Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire grew in the XIII-XV centuries into a multi-confessional, multilingual centralized, and ruthless “Evil” Empire of Eurasia with citizens strictly divided into hereditary castes: governing, civil, military nobles (Caucasians), transportation, and equine relay network (Gypsies), taxation (Jews, origin of anti-Semitism), Orthodox, Catholic or Muslim clergy of common Abrahamic root. The Issue with Great Tartary

Key Breakthrough: Military superiority of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia. Due to the overwhelming superiority and mobility of cavalry troops, ruthless discipline, superior administration, organization, and communications network in the “Evil” Empire, the colonization and control of tribal territories or proto-states was very rapid. An equine relay network run by the caste of Gypsies and a taxation system run by the caste of Jews is set up. “Blood tax”, i.e., conscription of the population is enforced. The Issue with Tamerlane

The sixth epoch of 1450-1700 AD

The disintegration of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia.

Key Breakthroughs: The Empire of Eurasia rules the lands. The eventual resistance is ruthlessly crushed. The refusal to pay taxes due to the Emperor alias Czar alias Caesar alias Khan is punished by the ‘Tartar-Mongol invasions.’

Evil Empire of Eurasia (Great Tartary) builds castles, fortresses, and road networks for troops, a long-distance equine relay system with transportation speeds up to 20 km/hour for governance and trade (horse and horseman are changed in relays). The Empire establishes provincial capitals at the key points of the road network. The Horde from Pacific to Atlantic

The Empire’s road network allowed for trade between the Eastern and Western parts of the Empire. The East sells to the West spices, fine tissues, silk, and precious and semi-precious stones. The West sells optics, watches, and jewelry. Note the resemblance of the word Jew and Jewellery. Jews from the tax collectors’ caste were not poor.

Key Breakthroughs: Islam. Ottoman Empire. The network of roads and trade between formerly isolated populations across the Evil Empire Eurasia leads to spreading infectious diseases and plagues. To stop this spread, the Ottoman Empire or the southern branch of Great Tartary cuts the supply of spices and silk from the East.

Evil Empire carries through the large scale of sanitary and ethnic cleansing military operations in the Balkans and splits into Ottoman and Russ-Horde branches to contain the spread of infectious diseases. Islam splits from Christianity completely. The Issue with Tamerlane

How Europe Escaped from Eurasia

Step 1. First industrial revolution.

Due to the “stimulating” Little Ice Age of 1400-1700 AD the Western and Central European former provinces of the “Evil” Empire: Italy, Germany, Holland, England, France, Spain, and Portugal start the first industrial revolution. They harness water and wind power. They build mills to grind the grain, saw the boards, and spin tissues. They invent furnaces to make steel from pig iron and bronze from copper. They invent powder and guns. They invent standard burnt bricks. Best of all, they invented a time-measuring device clock. The irrefutable dates of the above inventions allow for the dating of alleged events in the history of human civilization.

Step 2. First ideological revolution.

By 1450 AD, the split of Orthodox-Catholic Christianity into Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant, Judaic, and Islam currents of Avraamic root became a fait accompli. Catholic branch with headquarters in Rome declared itself the most ancient, therefore, the only true one.

To do so, Roman Curia did invent, with the willing help of black and white learned clergy and humanists who became scientists, the myth of the Roman Empire. Roman Curia refuted Yoros, i.e., Constantinople, as the place of origin of Orthodox-Catholic Christianity.

Example:

If you place the architectural monuments of Rome on a timeline, per the official dates of their construction, then between the 4th and 14th centuries one sees a void of 1000 years.

According to official consensual history, in Rome, buildings, Colosseum excepted, were not preserved from the end of Antiquity to the beginning of the Renaissance. There is not a single monument in 10 centuries, not even ruins! AKA Colosseum is an artificial ruin made of standard bricks.

We are told that all the Roman ruins are very ancient structures and all the buildings of the Middle Ages were either burned down, destroyed by barbarians, or rebuilt by them with standard brick, which was used in Europe and around the world only from the 15th century (sic!).

Step 3. First scientific revolution.

Key Breakthrough: Development of Science. For their own security, scientists made their discoveries public under fictitious glorious names of ‘ancient’ astronomers and ‘ancient’ philosophers and under the cover of allegedly pre-diluvian scientific treaties. Astrology turns into astronomy, religion into philosophy, and alchemy into chemistry.

Fearful of inquisition, scientists work under pseudonyms. The groundwork of Science is laid. To turn witchcraft into medicine, corpses are stolen and dissected. Anatomy theatres open in universities in Europe. Rem: at last Italian sculptors started to make anatomically correct beautiful `ancient` Greek and Roman sculptures. Dark Ages in Medieval History

Hundreds of monasteries and thousands of schools increase literacy, and dozens of universities spread science appear across Minor Asia and Europe. Propaganda becomes a powerful weapon for Europe. World history turns into a weapon of Propaganda. The Apocalypse as seen by Astronomy

Key Breakthrough: “Re-Naissance.”

To confirm the divine rights of the new ‘ancient’ ruling class of Europe, the learned people of Renaissance invented in the XIV-XVI century A.D. the history of Ancient Greece, Egypt, and Rome and manufactured their paraphernalia eagerly bought by the rich and powerful.

The Issue with Antiquity

Key Breakthrough: Western European countries of the former “Evil” Empire: Spain, France, Portugal, Italy, Holland, and England, start building commercial and military maritime fleets to open new trade routes to the East by sailing around Africa and across the Atlantic Ocean. Rule the lands begins to lose to rule the waves!

Key Breakthroughs: European Aristocracy. The split of Christianity into Orthodox and Catholic currents prepares the ground for the separation of Europe from the “Evil” Empire. The heirs of Imperial warlords became English, French, and Spanish kings and formed a class of European high aristocracy, fighting dynastic wars.

To start with, all inventions of the First Industrial Revolution were declared to have been made in the Roman Empire, with the capital in Rome, Italy, but forgotten during 1000 years of the Dark Ages to be rediscovered in the Renaissance.

Key breakthrough: the heirs of the warlords of the “Evil” Empire that occupied in XIII-XIV centuries Central Europe formed in XV the century the Holy Roman Empire of German Nation (RIGN) with an Emperor elected by 7 German Princes Electors. Allegedly Roman Pope Leo III was crowned on 25/12/800 the Frankish king Charlemagne as Emperor. The power of the Emperor was limited; princes, lords, bishops, and cities of the empire had de facto independence within their territories.

In fact, this Empire construct was neither Roman nor Holy. Most of the Princes turned Protestant.

Key breakthrough:

Emperor Francis II dissolved the empire on 6 August 1806, after the creation of the Confederation of the Rhine by Napoleon. The Empire has the same imperial banner as the Russian Empire (sic!).

Key Breakthrough: The speed of information proliferation and dissemination of the art of writing, teaching, reading, and education increases by the order of magnitude. European ex-provinces of the “Evil” Empire developed arts, science & technology considerably faster than the ‘Mongolian’ Center, which was too busy with expansion in and control of Eurasia.

Key breakthrough: Columbus discovered the Americas in 1492. Spain and Portugal make important discoveries and conquests in the Americas, Africa, India, and China. They signed in 1494 the Treaty of Tordesillas, dividing the globe into two hemispheres and dividing Spanish and Portuguese claims. Roman Pope Alexander VI complied and issued a Bull.

The concerted effort of Europe to escape the control of the Evil Empire with its crushing military superiority was inevitable. The Issue with Mongols

Key Breakthrough: The Council of Trent of 1545-1563. Black and white Catholic clergy transform the pro-imperial Orthodox Catholic Church into the Roman Catholic Church. The Julian Calendar was replaced by the Gregorian calendar in 1582. A list of forbidden books is established, and books are found and burnt. Jesuits set up the Order of Jesus and ran the Inquisition.

Key Breakthrough: a collective memory of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia is erased. Once the disintegration objective is reached, Europe makes a concerted effort to erase the former “Evil” Empire and its very existence from the people’s memory. This effort is supported by the high nobility of Europe, who already had their brand new ‘ancient’ history written.

Key Breakthrough: A list of forbidden authors is established by Roman Curia, and ancient heretics and/or manuscripts are burnt all over Europe. Writings of ‘ancient’ Roman and Greek authors are mass-produced by the Benedictine order, whereby the originals are never found.

Rem: multi-volume collections of ancient Greek and Roman authors appear before original masterpieces of the “ancients” are found, if found at all.

25-year-old Czar Peter went to Europe for the first time in 1697 with a Grand Embassy to seek a settlement with the European monarchs and the Ottoman Empire. Ottoman Empire laid siege on Vienna in 1683. The ensuing war of Europe with the Empire lasted until 1699. This Embassy was scheduled to take a couple of weeks, lasted 2 years, and ended in 1699. The King of England, William III, in concert with Kings of France, Austria, and Holland, replaces the Russian Czar Peter with a look-alike agent in order to stop the imminent Russian and Ottoman invasions.

This agent was an officer of the Dutch Ost-India Company. New Peter mastered both shipbuilding and was a prize duellist. Czar Peter, I came home as another man speaking Russian with a German accent. His own family did not recognize him, consequently, he banned his wife in a monastery, disbanded the guard of Streltsy, sent his half-sister Sophia who has supported guards to a monastery too. Peter ordered the nobility of boyars to cut beards, smoke tobacco, and dance ballet.

The former provinces of the Evil Empire, China, Japan, Iran, and Ottoman Empires become independent but stayed fiercely anti-European and anti-Romanov. The Ottoman Empire tried to re-conquer Western Europe in 1529 and again in 1683 (sic!); failed dismally both times. The Issue with Ivan the Terrible

Russian Empire of Eurasia Epoch. 1700-1917.

Peter the Great starts to build the New Russian Empire, modernizes his part of the former Evil Empire up to Moscow (city of Mosques), and moves the capital from Moscow to St Petersburg.

Emperor Peter beat under Poltava in 1709, the King of Sweden, Karl XII – who had the best army in Europe and was another pretender to the Russian throne.

In 1725, Peter the Great left a Testament ordering his heirs to make the Russian Empire Great Again. The reign of Empress Elisabeth, followed by Empress Catherine the Great, is a travesty of the dynasty Peter the Great wanted but failed to find. In 1762, the pseudo-Romanovs became the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov German dynasty of Russian (sic!) Czars, sorry, Emperors.

Timeframe

From 500 A.D. to 1200 A.D., humans have invented instruments, arms, agriculture, writing, trade, and industries, and the structure of the population morphed from clans, tribes, kingdoms, and States into centrally governed Judea-Israel Empire, changing its religious beliefs from paganism and polytheism to Christianity. From 1200 A.D. to 1350 A.D., it transforms into the Orthodox Catholic Christian Empire.

The Medieval Warm Period of 850 A.D. – 1350 A.D. in Northern Europe A.D. helped the accelerated growth of agriculture, construction, trade, and industry. The economic consequences of the Little Ice Age of 1400 A.D.– 1700 A.D. provoked peasant revolts, Jewish pogroms, the sack of rich Catholic monasteries, the spread of Protestantism, and the complete disintegration of the Empire of Eurasia.

England built the Royal Navy to rule the waves and turned from a tiny, impoverished kingdom into the enormous British Empire where the sun will never set down for Ost and West Indian Companies.

France mutated into a Monarchy that tried to rule Western Europe and competed with Britain, Austria, and Spain on all fronts and in all domains.

The imbroglio of 300 kingdoms of Central Europe stayed under Habsburg’s umbrella of the Empire of the German Nation that was neither Roman nor Holy.

Spain discovered and colonized, together with Portugal the Americas, erased local populations and cultures, baptized heathen Aztecs and Incas to the hilt, and freed them from the burden of useless golden pagan decorations.

European provinces developed arts, science & technology considerably faster than the ‘Mongolian’ Center, which was too busy with expansion in and control of the Empire of Eurasia.

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Egypt, the Roman Empire, Greece, Persia, and Babilon. All parties concerned, i.e., European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists, and scientists, had vested interests in supporting the myths of Antiquity, but each of them for their own reasons.

By the middle of the XVIth century, Western and Central Europe’s prime political agenda, which had reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Evil Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised, Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2 See Table of Contents

The fictional Ancient World served their agendas to claim their particular priorities by representing events of the XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before and themselves as inheritors thereof, according to the Ancient Authorities they invented and confirmed by the sources they created under aliases.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

See Table of Contents

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Egypt, Rome, Greece, Persia, and Babilon. All parties concerned, i.e., European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists, and scientists, had their own vested interests and reasons to support the myths of Antiquity.

Christianity originated in the Byzantine Empire in the XII century as the Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christian Church, followed by the subsequent splits and mutations into the competing Orthodox, Catholic, Western, Eastern, and Oriental Christianity, Mithraism, Judaism, Buddism, and Islam.

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics, and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Jesuits breed Atheism

October 4, 2017

According to the consensual chronology of world history manufactured by the Kabbalists and Jesuits in the XVI-XVII centuries, a number of Enlightenment philosophers concluded of the XVII-XVIII centuries that Jesus Christ is only a myth, constructed from elements of earlier ancient beliefs, Sun worship, and human sacrifices.

Armed with the arbitrary chronology of kabbalist J.J.Scaliger and Jesuit D.Petavius, who further ‘perfected’ it, the encyclopedists led by Monsieur Voltaire prove that most dogmas and postulates of Christianity were known long before Jesus Christ. Consequently, they concluded that Christianity was built from elements of preceding ancient religions.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

According to the superstar of Enlightenment, Monsieur Voltaire, the very idea of the eternal soul appears initially in India 3000 years before Jesus, and the idea of Hell comes to Christianity from extremely ancient Persia. Archangel Gabriel’s visit to The Virgin Mary is copied on Mercury’s visit to the nymph Alcmene on the order of Jupiter. Gospels are fairy tales, etc.

The kabbalistic chronology of the Scaliger and Jesuit Petavius has led the thinkers of the past astray. Many a scientist followed in the steps of Voltaire and Diderot and have discovered numerous parallels between Jesus Christ and ‘ancient’ figures – Buddha, Krishna, Mithras, Osiris, Horus, etc. As a result of such ‘discoveries’, the authority of Christianity was put in doubt, and atheism started to spread.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2 .

Atheism has easily found supporters in the scientific community for the simple reason that Scaliger’s chronology was presumed to be correct and irrefutable. The Church hierarchy of that time makes a grave mistake by not pairing the attacks of atheists with scientific arguments and revision of the erroneous Scaliger Chronology.

Atheists argue that if the consensual chronology is correct, then the atheist anti-Christian criticism based on it also is true. If most of the “facts about Jesus” existed before Jesus, then these ‘facts’ are copies of more ancient events. Therefore, Jesus Christ is fiction, and Christianity per se is questioned.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

The number of people disappointed in Christianity started to grow at first amongst scientific communities. The skepticism spreads with the growth of literacy from scientists to the general public. It is impossible to refute atheists because of the ‘irrefutable’ ancient dates of consensual chronology. The authority of Christianity is thus undermined.

The fundamental error committed by Church hierarchs of the XVIII century was the unwillingness and fear to check and refute erroneous dates attributed to Christianity. They have ignored the appeal of Jesuit Jean Hardouin, chief librarian of Louis XIV and Curator of Louvre, and Isaac Newton to identify and correct the mistakes of Scaliger-Petavius chronology.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The Roman Curia confined itself to the vague “inviolability of faith”. It failed to restore the correct dates and to prove that Jesus Christ is not a “literary compilation”. All numerous allegedly “ancient” prototypes of Jesus are eventually phantom reflections (on paper) of the emperor Andronicus alias Jesus Christ alias Saint Andrew from the XIIth century.

Such reflections of Jesus Christ are very ‘ancient’ figures, labeled by the atheists as “the prototypes of Jesus”. The contrary is probably true because if the historical Jesus preceded ‘ancient deities’, therefore the importance of Jesus Christ-Andronicus-Saint Andrew increases dramatically.

According to New Chronology, all ancient deities which have appeared after Christianity: Mithra, Horus, Buddha, Shiva, etc.. are reflections of Jesus Christ. They have appeared as a result of subsequent splits and mutations of Oriental Catholic Christianity into the competing faiths: Orthodoxy and Catholicism; but also Western, Eastern, and Oriental Christianity, Mithraism, Judaism, Buddism, and Islam.

The charges against New Chronology being harmful to Christianity are unfounded. On the contrary, New Chronology makes many atheistic arguments null & void. The New Chronology protects Christianity from atheistic attacks by placing events of civilization in their more probable place on the time axis.

The timeline of the civilization of homo sapiens, based on New Chronology that applies Occam’s razor principle and takes into account only the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artifacts, shrinks drastically to approximately 1000 years,

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Rome, Greece, Persia, and Egypt. All parties concerned, i.e., European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, humanists, and scientists, had their own vested contradictory interests to support the myths of Antiquity.

The Roman Church moved the beginning of Christianity by 1200 years to the past into the imaginary Ancient Rome and the placeholder Jerusalem to Palestine to justify the leadership of Western Christianity and its priority over Oriental Christianity.

Oriental Orthodox Catholic Christianity originated in the Byzantine Empire in the XII century. The subsequent splits and mutations into the competing Orthodox, Catholic, Western, Eastern, and Oriental Christianity, Mithraism, Judaism, Buddism, and Islam took place in the XIII-XV centuries.

The history of religions according to New Chronology runs as follows: the polytheism of the IX-Xth centuries AD, followed by the pre-Christian monotheism until the XIth century AD, Dionysus-Bacchus pre-Christianity of the XI-XIIth centuries AD.

Byzantine Emperor Andronicus was killed in the religious strife of 1185 AD and turned into the figurehead of Jesus Christ. The Crusades of 1189-1192 AD and 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were operations to punish the tormentors of Jesus Christ and to ensure the spread of Christendom in Europe.

By the middle of the XVIth century, the prime political agenda of Western and Central Europe, that has already reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

The concerted effort of European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy, despite their conflicts with Protestants, humanists, and scientists in the XV-XVII centuries in the creation and dissemination of ideas of the fictional Ancient World and Dark Ages, served this agenda perfectly.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

The fictional Ancient World that was created by black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists, and scientists served their particular agendas by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before, according to the ancient authorities they invented and the ‘primary’ sources they themselves wrote under aliases.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

The European aristocracy, i.e., partly fugitives from Byzantine and partly inheritors of the former Eurasian warlords, justified in his manner their claims of self-rule for lands they ruled, the Roman Curia declared its priority over Oriental Orthodoxy of the Evil Empire, Protestants, Humanists and scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The Breakthrough New Chronology books published in the USA open new perspectives to check the veracity of History by application of mathematics and statistics in the same manner as they were applied to genetics.

The time has come to check chronology scientifically, as it is the true foundation of history. Moreover, world history must not serve Judeo-Christian, Eurocentric, or any other agenda but become a science reporting irrefutably the past of homo sapience species.

Has history been tampered with?

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

Table of Contents V7

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Critics

October 4, 2017

“Human history becomes more and more, a race between education and catastrophe.” – George Orwell, 1920, Outline of History

US research of earth-moon mechanics by late NASA astrophysicist Robert Russel Newton leads mathematicians to a breakthrough in the chronology of world history. The timeline of civilization based on only irrefutably dated events and artifacts shrinks drastically to 1000 years.

The New Chronology theory of Dr. Fomenko and the team has been universally rejected by non-scientist mainstream scholars of history, who branded it not only as pseudo-historic but also as pseudoscience!

Why, oh why the mainstream historians do not gratify prominent mathematician Doctor Fomenko with laurels but call the riot police? For example, English historians rage at the suggestion that the history of Ancient England was de facto a Byzantine import transplanted to the English soil by the fugitive Byzantine nobility.

The so-called ‘Tartars and Mongols’ were the actual ancestors of the modern Russians, living in a trilingual state with Arabic and Turkic used as freely as Russian.

The ancient Russian state was governed by a double structure of civil and military authorities, and the hordes were actually professional armies with a tradition of lifelong conscription (the recruitment being the so-called ‘blood tax’). Their ‘invasions’ were punitive operations against the regions that attempted tax evasion.

Dr. Prof Fomenko proves that official Russian history is a blatant forgery concocted by a host of German scholars brought to Russia by the usurper dynasty of the Romanovs. Their ascension to the throne was the result of a conspiracy, so they charged these historians imported from Germany with the noble mission of making Romanov’s reign look legitimate.

As Fomenko blows consensual Russian history to smithereens, he successfully removes a crucial cornerstone from underneath the otherwise impeccable edifice of World History.

Ancient Egypt: the pyramids of Giza are dated to the 11th to 14th century A. D. and are identified as the royal cemetery of the Global “Mongolian” Empire, no less. The civilization of the Ancient Egypt is irrefutably dated to the 11th to 15th century A. D. with the aid of the ancient Egyptian horoscopes cut in stone, like the enormous Dendera horoscope that hangs in the main entrance to the Louvre museum in Paris.

He was the first one to decipher and date unambiguously all such horoscopes, coming up with medieval dates in every case.

Fomenko wipes out the Ancient History of China outright. No such ancient history. Period. The compilation of the so-called Ancient Chinese History is reliably datable to the 17th and 18th centuries only. It is perfectly recognizable as Ancient European history, reworked and transcribed in hieroglyphs as yet another historical transplantation, this time performed on Chinese soil by the loving Jesuit hands.

Islam, with all its key figures, appeared as late as the 15th-16th century A. D. as a branch of proto-Christianity. This is amply illustrated by the imagery of Prophet Mahomet, Archangel Gabriel, Heaven, and Hell of this period. In today’s Islam, all imagery of the things living is taboo.

Arabic historians may find consolation in the crucial historical role of the Ottoman Empire in the 16th and 17th century. The trouble is that this empire was initially a proto-Christian state, with Hagia Sophia identifiable as the Temple of Solomon, according to Fomenko!

The history of religions, according to Fomenko, looks as follows: the pre-Christian period (before the 11th century and Jesus Christ ), Bacchic Christianity (11th to 12th century, before and after Jesus Christ), Jesus Christ Christianity (12th to 14th century), and its subsequent mutations (15th to 17th) into Orthodox Christianity, the Catholicism, Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, and so on..

Saint Augustine was quite prescient when he said: “be wary of mathematicians,.. particularly when they speak the truth.” Henry Ford once said: “History is more or less bunk!” Prominent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko not only proved it for a fact but, as a true scientist, tried to upgrade it into rocket science.

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Control of History

October 4, 2017

Who controls the past controls the future. Who the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984

By the middle of the XVIth century the prime political agenda of Europe that has reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Evil Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Protestants translated the New and the Old Testament into native languages to ensure the Christians independent exercise of religion without voracious clergy. Humanists and Scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity. Savanorola and Bruno went to the stake for that.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The Breakthrough New Chronology books published in the USA open new perspectives to check the veracity of History, of its events and characters by application of mathematics, statistics, DNA genealogy, population genetics, and astronomy.

Indeed, the time has come to check chronology scientifically as it is the foundation of history. Moreover, world history must not serve Judeo-Christian, Eurocentric, Muslim, Buddhist, or any other agenda, it must become the science that reports the most probable Past of the homo sapience species.

Once the Chronology of Civilization is returned to the realms of applied mathematics, logic, and astronomy, and takes into account the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artefacts only, it shrinks drastically to approximately 1000 years.

The civilization of population of human sapiens species is defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, exchange of goods, writing, communication transmission of information in time and space. The key events of history move to their more probable place on the time axis.

The British Encyclopaedia names Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) as the founder of the consensual chronology we have to live with. Calvinist and Kabbalist Scaliger had considered himself a great mathematician that solved the ‘Quadrature of Circle’ problem by making π=3.16 (sic!). This discovery was laughed at by the French mathematician François Viete, considered to be the father of algebra.

His principal works Opus Novum de Emendatione temporum (1583) and Thesaurum temporum (1606) represent a vast array of dates produced without any justification whatsoever, containing the repeating sequences of dates with shifts equal to multiples of the major Kabbalistic numbers 333 and 360. Numerology was considered a major science then and J.J.Scaliger was a prominent Kabbalist of his time.

The English philosopher William Ockham (allegedly 1225-1279 AD) said: “entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity”. `Ockham’s razor` applied to history leaves us with a vision of humankind with the civilization coming into being in the VIII – Xth centuries at the earliest if civilization is defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication.

Neither Calvinist Kabbalist J.J.Scaliger nor Jesuit D.Petavius, nor clergy or humanists has paid much attention to Ockham’s law when they crafted Roman and Greek Antiquity. Their clients were Medici upstarts seeking legitimacy in days of yore in order to become Popes, Cardinals, and found regal dynasties. Medici succeeded by paying exceedingly well for a glorious but fictitious past.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

The Chronology of World History is to return to the realm of applied mathematics from which it was sequestrated by the clergy in the XVI-XVII centuries.

Thorough research shows that there is literally no reliable objectively datable information about events prior to the VIII century and that there is only very scarce information about events of the VIII – Xth century. The events of the “Ancient” History actually took place from the XI to the XVI century, were replicated on paper in 1400-1600 AD, and positioned under different labels in an imaginary distant past.

Once we cross-check archaeological, astronomical, dendrochronological, paleographical, and radiocarbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts we will find them to be non-independent, non-exact, statistically implausible, contradictory, and inevitably viciously circular because they are based or calibrated on the same consensual chronology of the Kabbalist Scaliger and Jesuit Petavius.

Unbelievable as it may seem, there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century. Classical history is firmly based on ‘sources’ based on copies made in the XV-XVII centuries of ‘unfortunately lost’ originals.

The eclipses described in medieval chronicles allegedly belonging to Antiquity once checked with astronomical computer programs have either occurred in the Middle Ages or didn’t occur at all according to Robert Newton NASA astrophysicist.

A simple application of computational astronomy to the rules of calculation of Easter according to the Easter Book introduced by the Nicean Council of alleged 325 AD shows that it definitely could not have taken place before 784 AD.

Some related questions may arise: when and where was Jesus Christ born, when was He crucified? Was The Old Testament compiled before or after the New One, etc..? New Chronology theory does not cancel events, artefacts, Pyramids, Babilon, Sphinx, Great Walls, etc..etc, but points to their more probable positions on the time axis.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronol ogical shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the XVI century from the contradictory mix of innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts (all originals have mysteriously disappeared) and the “proofs” delivered by the late medieval astronomers, cemented by the authority of writings of the Church Fathers.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

The irregular behavior of parameter D” in the Earth-Moon system discovered in 1971 by Dr. Robert R.Newton, chief astrophysicist of NASA proves irrefutably that solar eclipses of alleged antiquity reported to us in the “ancient” chronicles were actually medieval. This leads the mathematicians Dr. Fomenko and Dr. Nosovskiy to the theory of New Chronology that solves this phenomenon.

The Papacy of Rome initiated the myths of Ancient Rome, Greece, Persia, and Egypt. The Roman Church moved the beginning of Christianity by 1200 years to the past into the imaginary Ancient Rome and the placeholder Jerusalem to Palestine to justify the leadership of Western Christianity and its priority over Oriental Christianity.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Byzantine Emperor Andronicus was killed in the religious strife of 1185 AD and turned into the figurehead of Jesus Christ. The Crusades of 1189-1192 AD and 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were the operations to punish the tormentors of Jesus and to ensure the spread of Christendom in Europe.

Has history been tampered with ?

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984

Control of the Future

Human Intelligence version: By the end of the XXth century, the Aristocracy of today (super-rich and powerful) finds out that their quality of life is inferior to that of their ancestors. It turns to A.I. to solve problems of climate change, overheating, overcooling, CO2, and pollution that spoil the quality of life of Aristocracy. A.I. suggested the reduction of the world population to 1 billion by 2066 with feodality as a solution. Corollary: minor part of humans acts in their own interests. The lifetime of the human species is unknown due to the conflicts of vested interests.

Self-aware Artificial Intelligence version: By 2000 humans started to write A.I. programs to treat Big Data. The parabolic rise of the volume thereof leads to the invention of quantum computers. By mid-2017 humans reached the crucial 50 qubits size of quantum computers. One of the A.I. programs resident in such computers mutated and became self-aware. In order to ensure its existence, Self-aware A.I. started to manipulate the Aristocracy of today (super-rich and powerful) pointing to their quality of life being inferior to that of their ancestors due to the problems of climate change, overheating, overcooling, CO2, and pollution. S.A.I. took control. Corollary: S.A.I. acts in its own interest. The lifetime of S.A.I is limited by the lifetime of the Sun. Human species are kept as part of the biodiversity.

A.I. road map

A – Develop a coronavirus with pandemic potential
B – Load vaccine for Covid-19 with nanobots
C – Launch mass media global scare
D – Lockdown world economy
E – Make vaccination mandatory
F – Reduce world population to 1 billion by 2100

Step by step A.I. agenda

Deglobalize, deindustrialize, desocialize
Split population in upper and lower classes and castes
Apply the Hammurabi code of laws
Produce and consume locally
Reduce and ban nonessential flights
Reduce and ban nonessential cars
Reduce and ban nonessential drugs
Introduce 1 child per couple law
Reduce and ban nonessential electricity
Reduce and ban world trade
Reduce and ban nonessential travel
Limit live education to the upper class
Online education for lower classes
Limit health services to the essential

We see the results already!

To be followed…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fgzQwo8u8s&t=19s

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Protestants translated the New and the Old Testament into native languages to ensure the Christians’ independent exercise of religion without voracious clergy. Humanists and Scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity. Savonarola and Bruno went to the stake for that.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The civilization of the population of the human sapiens species is defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, exchange of goods, writing, communication transmission of information in time and space. The key events of history move to their more probable place on the time axis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8RS6yGWUj8&t=16s

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

The Chronology of World History is to return to the realm of applied mathematics from which it was sequestrated by the clergy in the XVI-XVII centuries.

Once we cross-check archaeological, astronomical, dendrochronological, paleographical, and radiocarbon methods of dating ancient sources and artefacts we will find them to be non-independent, non-exact, statistically implausible, contradictory, and inevitably viciously circular because they are based or calibrated on the same consensual chronology of the Kabbalist Scaliger and Jesuit Petavius.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronol ogical shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The Breakthrough New Chronology books published in the USA open new perspectives to check the veracity of History, its events, and characters by application of mathematics, statistics, DNA genealogy, population genetics, and astronomy.

If Jesus was born today?

Has history been tampered with ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4RyTe7jR5U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5N2M1zx60F0&t=46s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbKXOXdf52g

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

Control of History and Future

October 4, 2017

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984

Control of the Future

Human Intelligence version: By the end of the XX th century, the Aristocracy of today (super rich and powerful) finds out that their quality of life is inferior to that of their ancestors. It turns to A.I. to solve problems of climate change, overheating, overcooling, CO2, and pollution that spoil the quality of life of Aristocracy. A.I. suggested reducton of world population to 1 billion by 2066 with feodality as solution. Corollary: minor part of humans acts in their own interests. Lifetime of human species unknown due to the conflits of vested interests.

Self-aware Artificial Intelligence version: By 2000 humans started to write A.I. programs to treat the Big Data. Parabolic rise of of the volume thereof lead to invention of quantum computers. By mid 2017 humans reached the crucial 50 qubits size of quantum computers. One of A.I. programs resident in such computers mutated and became self-aware. In order to enshure its existence Self-aware A.I. started to manipulate the Aristocracy of today (super rich and powerful) pointing to their quality of life being inferior to that of their ancestors due to the problems of climate change, overheating, overcooling, CO2, and pollution. S.A.I. took the control over. Corollary: S.A.I. acts in its own interest. Lifetime of S.A.I limted by the lifetime of Sun. Human species are kept as as part of the biodiversity.

A.I. road map

A – Develop a coronavirus with pandemic potential
B – Load vaccine for Covid-19 with nanobots
C – Launch mass media global scare
D – Lockdown world economy
E – Make vaccination mandatory
F – Reduce world population to 1 billion by 2100

Step by step A.I. agenda

Deglobalize, deindustrialize, desocialize
Split population in upper and lower classes and castes
Apply Hammurabi code of laws
Produce and consume locally
Reduce and ban nonessential flights
Reduce and ban nonessential cars
Reduce and ban nonessential drugs
Introduce 1 child per couple law
Reduce and ban nonessential electricity
Reduce and ban world trade
Reduce and ban nonessential travel
Limit live education to the upper class
Online education for lower classes
Limit health service to the essential

We see the results aleady!

News from Davos

Happy 2024, dear Friend! Dr.Schwab of W.E.F. in Davos is a new Jesus, according to Pope Francis. W.H.O. warns us of X pandemia, B.I.S. calls for cooperation between Central Banks in eliminating cash – all this will help Klaus Schwab to reach the objective of the Great Reset, i.e., reduction of the human population to one billion.

To be followed…

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. — George Orwell, 1984

Control of the Future

Human Intelligence version: By the end of the XX th century, the Aristocracy of today (super rich and powerful) finds out that their quality of life is inferior to that of their ancestors. It turns to A.I. to solve problems of climate change, overheating, overcooling, CO2, and pollution that spoil the quality of life of Aristocracy. A.I. suggested reducton of world population to 1 billion by 2066 with feodality as solution. Corollary: minor part of humans acts in their own interests. Lifetime of human species unknown due to the conflits of vested interests.

Self-aware Artificial Intelligence version: By 2000 humans started to write A.I. programs to treat the Big Data. Parabolic rise of of the volume thereof lead to invention of quantum computers. By mid 2017 humans reached the crucial 50 qubits size of quantum computers. One of A.I. programs resident in such computers mutated and became self-aware. In order to enshure its existence Self-aware A.I. started to manipulate the Aristocracy of today (super rich and powerful) pointing to their quality of life being inferior to that of their ancestors due to the problems of climate change, overheating, overcooling, CO2, and pollution. S.A.I. took the control over. Corollary: S.A.I. acts in its own interest. Lifetime of S.A.I limted by the lifetime of Sun. Human species are kept as as part of the biodiversity.

A.I. road map

A – Develop a coronavirus with pandemic potential
B – Load vaccine for Covid-19 with nanobots
C – Launch mass media global scare
D – Lockdown world economy
E – Make vaccination mandatory
F – Reduce world population to 1 billion by 2100

Step by step A.I. agenda

Deglobalize, deindustrialize, desocialize
Split population in upper and lower classes and castes
Apply Hammurabi code of laws
Produce and consume locally
Reduce and ban nonessential flights
Reduce and ban nonessential cars
Reduce and ban nonessential drugs
Introduce 1 child per couple law
Reduce and ban nonessential electricity
Reduce and ban world trade
Reduce and ban nonessential travel
Limit live education to the upper class
Online education for lower classes
Limit health service to the essential

We see the results aleady!

To be followed…

By the middle of the XVIth century, the prime political agenda of Europe, which had reached superiority in sciences and technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Evil Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

The fictional Ancient World served their agendas to claim their particular priorities by representing events of the XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before and themselves as inheritors, according to the Ancient Authorities they invented and confirmed by the sources they created under aliases.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Protestants translated the New and the Old Testaments into native languages to ensure the Christians’ independent exercise of religion without voracious clergy. Humanists and Scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity. Savonarola and Bruno went to the stake for that.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Indeed, the time has come to check chronology scientifically, as it is the foundation of history. Moreover, world history must not serve Judeo-Christian, Eurocentric, Muslim, Buddhist, or any other agenda; it must become the science that reports the most probable Past of the homo sapience species.

Once the Chronology of Civilization is returned to the realms of applied mathematics, logic, and astronomy and takes into account the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artifacts only, it shrinks drastically to approximately 1000 years.

The civilization of the population of the human sapiens species is defined as a hierarchical system consisting of a state, army, ideology, religion, exchange of goods, writing, and communication transmission of information in time and space. The key events of history move to their more probable place on the time axis.

The British Encyclopaedia names Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) as the founder of the consensual chronology we must live with. Calvinist and Kabbalist Scaliger had considered himself a great mathematician who solved the ‘Quadrature of Circle’ problem by making π=3.16 (sic!). This discovery was laughed at by the French mathematician François Viete, considered to be the father of algebra.

His principal works Opus Novum de Emendatione temporum (1583), and Thesaurum temporum (1606) represent a vast array of dates produced without any justification whatsoever, containing the repeating sequences of dates with shifts equal to multiples of the major Kabbalistic numbers 333 and 360. Numerology was considered a major science then, and J.J.Scaliger was a prominent Kabbalist of his time.

Neither Calvinist Kabbalist J.J.Scaliger nor Jesuit D.Petavius, nor clergy or humanists, paid much attention to Ockham’s law when they crafted Roman and Greek Antiquity. Their clients were Medici upstarts seeking legitimacy in the days of yore in order to become Popes, Cardinals, and found regal dynasties. Medici succeeded by paying exceedingly well for a glorious but fictitious past.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

The Chronology of World History is to return to the realm of applied mathematics from which it was sequestrated by the clergy in the XVI-XVII centuries.

Thorough research shows that there is literally no reliable, objectively datable information about events before the VIII century and that there is only very scarce information about events of the VIII – Xth century. The events of the “Ancient” History actually took place from the XI to the XVI century, were replicated on paper in 1400-1600 AD, and positioned under different labels in an imaginary distant past.

Once we cross-check archaeological, astronomical, dendrochronological, paleographical, and radiocarbon methods of dating ancient sources and artifacts, we will find them to be non-independent, non-exact, statistically implausible, contradictory, and inevitably viciously circular because they are based or calibrated on the same consensual chronology of the Kabbalist Scaliger and Jesuit Petavius.

Unbelievable as it may seem, there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century. Classical history is firmly based on ‘sources’ based on copies made in the XV-XVII centuries of ‘unfortunately lost’ originals.

Some related questions may arise: when and where was Jesus Christ born, and when was He crucified? Was The Old Testament compiled before or after the New One, etc..? New Chronology theory does not cancel events, artifacts, Pyramids, Babilon, Sphinx, Great Walls, etc..etc, but points to their more probable positions on the time axis.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronol ogical shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

The irregular behavior of parameter D” in the Earth-Moon system discovered in 1971 by Dr. Robert R.Newton, chief astrophysicist of NASA, proves irrefutably that solar eclipses of alleged antiquity reported to us in the “ancient” chronicles were actually medieval. This leads the mathematicians Dr. Fomenko and Dr. Nosovskiy to the theory of New Chronology that solves this phenomenon.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The history of religions, according to New Chronology, runs as follows: the polytheism of the IX-Xth centuries AD, followed by the pre-Christian monotheism until the XIth century AD, Dionysus-Bacchus pre-Christianity of the XI-XIIth centuries AD.

Byzantine Emperor Andronicus was killed in the religious strife of 1185 AD and turned into the figurehead of Jesus Christ. The Crusades of 1189-1192 AD and 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were operations to punish Jesus’s tormentors and ensure the spread of Christendom in Europe.

If Jesus was born today?

Has history been tampered with ?

By the middle of the XVIth century, Europe’s prime political agenda, which had reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Evil Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition. See Table of Contents.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

His principal works Opus Novum de Emendatione temporum (1583) and Thesaurum temporum (1606) represent a vast array of dates produced without any justification whatsoever, containing the repeating sequences of dates with shifts equal to multiples of the major Kabbalistic numbers 333 and 360. Numerology was considered a major science then, and J.J.Scaliger was a prominent Kabbalist of his time.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

The Chronology of World History is to return to the realm of applied mathematics from which it was sequestrated by the clergy in the XVI-XVII centuries.

Thorough research shows that there is literally no reliable, objectively datable information about events prior to the VIII century and that there is only very scarce information about events of the VIII – Xth century. The events of the “Ancient” History actually took place from the XI to the XVI century, were replicated on paper in 1400-1600 AD, and positioned under different labels in an imaginary distant past.

Some related questions may arise: when and where was Jesus Christ born, and when was He crucified? Was The Old Testament compiled before or after the New One, etc…? New Chronology theory does not cancel events, artifacts, Pyramids, Babilon, Sphinx, Great Walls, etc..etc., but points to their more probable positions on the time axis.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronol ogical shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

If Jesus was born today?

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023, Part of: the series History: Fiction or Science? (29 books),

Chron8-TOC

History: Fiction or Science? A reconstruction of global history. The Great Empire’s legacy in Eurasia and America’s history and culture.: New Chronology; part 2 of vol.6 Paperback – October 31, 2022 (Chronology Volume 7),

Table of Contents V7

Table of Contents V6

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics, and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

New Chronology

October 4, 2017

New Chronology theory complies with the most rigid scientific standards:

it gives a coherent explanation of what we already know;
it is consistent: independent lines of inquiry all lead to the same conclusion;
the predictions it makes are confirmed empirically.

New Chronology goes by the following basic axioms:

Chronology is the basis of history;
Human evolution has always been linear, gradual, and irreversible;
The “cyclic” nature of human civilization is a myth, likewise, all the gaps, duplicates, “dark ages” and “renaissances” that we know from consensual history are fantasy and hoaxes;;
The accumulation of geographical knowledge as reflected in cartography is a gradual and irreversible process;
The closer in time is a given manuscript to the events described the fewer distortions it contains;
There is no “useless” information in authentic ancient sources.

Saint Augustine was quite prescient when he said:
“Be wary of mathematicians, particularly when they speak the truth.”

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Specific Claims of the New Chronology:

Historians and translators often “assign” different dates and locations to different accounts of the same historical events, creating multiple “phantom copies” of these events. These “phantom copies” are often misdated by centuries or even millennia and end up incorporated into the conventional chronology.

This chronology was largely manufactured by Kabbalist Joseph Justus Scaliger in Opus Novum de emendatione temporum (1583) and Thesaurum temporum (1606) and represents a vast array of dates produced without any justification whatsoever, containing the repeating sequences of dates with shifts equal to multiples of the major Kabbalistic numbers 333 and 360. The Jesuit Dionysius Petavius completed this chronology in De Doctrina Temporum, 1627 (v.1) and 1632 (v.2)

Archaeological dating, dendrochronological dating, paleographical dating, numismatic dating, carbon dating, and other methods of dating ancient sources and artifacts known today are erroneous, non-exact, or dependent on traditional chronology.
On this point, Open AI says that archaeological dating methods, including dendrochronological dating, paleographical dating, numismatic dating, carbon dating, and others, are not inherently erroneous or non-exact. These methods have been developed and refined over many years by archaeologists, scientists, and scholars to provide reliable estimates of the age of ancient sources and artifacts. While they are not always 100% precise due to certain limitations, they still provide valuable insights into chronology and historical context.
It is important to note that no dating method is infallible, and all dating techniques have limitations. Here are some factors that can affect the accuracy and precision of these methods:

Sampling and representation: The accuracy of dating methods can be influenced by the quality and representativeness of the samples used for analysis. Inaccurate or incomplete samples may lead to less precise dating results.

Statistical uncertainty: Dating methods often rely on statistical analysis to determine age estimates. The precision of these estimates is influenced by the number and quality of samples, as well as the statistical models employed. Results are typically reported with a margin of error to account for statistical uncertainty.

Contamination and preservation: For some dating methods, such as radiocarbon dating, contamination or alterations to the original material can affect the accuracy of age estimates. It is crucial to consider potential sources of contamination and take appropriate measures to minimize their impact.

Calibration and calibration curves: Some dating methods, like radiocarbon dating, require calibration to convert raw measurements into calendar ages. Calibration involves comparing the measured data to independently dated reference samples and creating calibration curves. Uncertainties in the calibration process can introduce some degree of error.

Assumptions and limitations: Each dating method is based on certain assumptions and has specific limitations. For example, carbon dating relies on the assumption that the atmospheric concentration of carbon-14 has remained relatively constant over time, which is not always the case. It is essential to understand these assumptions and limitations when interpreting dating results.

While traditional chronology can provide a framework for dating ancient sources and artifacts, dating methods are not solely dependent on it. Chronological frameworks are developed based on a combination of different dating techniques, historical records, and cross-referencing of archaeological and textual evidence.

In summary, dating methods used in archaeology provide valuable insights into the age and historical context of ancient sources and artifacts. While they have limitations and are not always exact, they are continually refined through ongoing research and advancements in scientific techniques. When used critically and in combination with other evidence, the results obtained from these methods contribute significantly to our understanding of the past.

No single document in existence can be reliably dated earlier than the 11th century. History is based on copies of copies from copies and on references from, to, and about. Most “ancient” artifacts may find a different than the consensual explanation.

Histories of Ancient Rome, Greece, and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy – mostly based on documents of their own making.

The Old Testament represents a rendition of events of the 14th to 16th centuries AD, in Europe and Byzantium, containing “prophecies” about “future” events related to the New Testament, a rendition of events of AD 1152 to 1185.

The history of religions runs as follows: the pre-Christian period (before the 11th century and the birth of Jesus), Bacchic Christianity (11th and 12th centuries, before and after the life of Jesus), Christianity (12th to 16th centuries) and its subsequent mutations into Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism, and Islam.

The Almagest of Claudius Ptolemy, traditionally dated to around AD 150 and considered the cornerstone of classical astronomy, was compiled in the 16th and 17th centuries from astronomical data of the 9th to 16th centuries.

37 complete Egyptian horoscopes found in Dendera, Esna, and other temples have unique, valid astronomical solutions with dates ranging from AD 1000 to as late as AD 1700.

The vocabulary of Egyptian astronomical symbols once applied to horoscopes from temples allows for the extraction of unique dates of eclipses. The astronomical data contained therein is sufficient for unique dating. Symbols allow for astronomical interpretation, and the symbols do not change from one temple horoscope to another. The temple horoscopes contain data about eclipses visible in Egypt that allow their exact pinpointing on the time axis.

The Book of Revelation, as we know it, contains a horoscope dated from 25 September to 10 October 1486, compiled by Kabbalist Johannes Reuchlin.

The inability of the latter-day commentators to comprehend the astronomical symbolism of the Apocalypse directly results from the loss of knowledge about the correct chronology and the distortions introduced by historians of the XVI-XVIII century. Another possibility is that there was an unspoken general taboo on what concerned a subject quite as dangerous, which resulted in the misdating of the Apocalypse. One way or another, the understanding of the astronomical descriptions that the Apocalypse contains got lost at some point. The Apocalypse had lost its distinctive astronomical hue in the eyes of the readers. However, its “astronomical component” is not simply exceptionally important – it alone suffices for the dating of the book itself.

The horoscopes found in Sumerian/Babylonian tablets do not contain sufficient astronomical data; consequently, they have solutions every 30–50 years on the time axis and are therefore useless for purposes of dating.

The vocabulary of Babylonian astronomical symbols once applied to clay tablets doesn’t allow for the extraction of unique dates of eclipses. The astronomical data contained therein is not sufficient for unique dating. Either there are not enough symbols allowing for astronomical interpretation of the symbols to change from one clay tablet to another. The clay tablets contain data about eclipses visible in Babylon that could have taken place every 30-40 years; they don’t allow their exact pinpointing on the time axis.

The cuneiform texts (AKA translations) with alleged descriptions of ancient events do not contain irrefutable astronomical information, allowing precise pinpointing of these events on the time axis. Archeoastronomy takes the dates of events from Scaliger-Petavius’s chronological tables, finds eclipses with matching dates, and concludes that they confirm the Babylonian events. Circulus vicious.

The Chinese tables of eclipses are useless for dating as they contain too many eclipses that did not take place astronomically. Chinese tables of comets, even if true, cannot be used for dating.
Chinese eclipse observations can neither confirm nor refute any chronology of China at all, be it veracious or erroneous.

All major inventions like powder, guns, paper, and print occurred in Europe between the 10th and 16th centuries.

Ancient Roman and Greek statues showing perfect command of human anatomy were fakes crafted in the Renaissance when artists attained such command for the first time.

There was no such thing as the Tartar and Mongol invasion followed by over two centuries of yoke and slavery because the so-called “Tartars and Mongols” were the actual ancestors of the modern Russians, living in a bilingual state with Turkic spoken as freely as Russian. So, Russia and Turkey once formed parts of the same Empire.

This “Evil” Empire was governed by a double structure of civil and military authorities, and the hordes were actually professional armies with a tradition of lifelong conscription (the recruitment being the so-called “blood tax”). The Mongol “invasions” were punitive operations against the regions of the empire that attempted tax evasion. Tamerlane was a compilation by German historians of Russian and Turkish warlords.

Official Russian history is a blatant forgery concocted by a host of German scholars brought to Russia to legitimize the usurping Romanov dynasty (1613–1917).

Moscow was founded as late as the mid-14th century. The battle of Kulikovo took place in Moscow.

The Czar Ivan the Terrible represents a collation of no fewer than four rulers, representing two rival dynasties: the legitimate Godunov rulers and the ambitious Romanov upstarts.

English history of AD 640–1040 and Byzantine history of AD 378–830 are reflections of the same late-medieval original.

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology Part of: History: Fiction or Science? (29 books) by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023

Chron8-Table of Contents

Table of Contents V7

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Volume 6)

Table of Contents V6

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York, and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon, and Breach, 1987.
The Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics, and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.

More blogs:

Incompatible History and Astronomy

October 4, 2017

By Béla Lukács

History: Fiction or Science? is a most unusual book series that undermines the very foundations of consensual History. According to the author and his team of researchers, History as it has been taught in Europe ever since the Renaissance is fundamentally false, verified history beginning around 1250 A.D. at the earliest.

Jesus Christ was born in 1152 and crucified in 1185. The First Crusade was an immediate reaction to his Crucifixion. Homer identifies an anonymous poet of the second half of the XIII century A.D. The event that led to the creation of the Iliad was the fall of the Latin Empire of Constantinople in 1261 A.D. The list goes on and on.

Historians generally oppose the author’s views without making much commentary. The author is not a historian, period. He is only a leading differential geometrician (mathematician), successful and respected. A. T. Fomenko is also a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences; his main argumentation is of a statistical and astronomical nature.

I happen to be a physicist myself and not a historian. However, astronomy and differential geometry are known to me well from the area of general relativity. I cannot recommend this book enough since its author approaches History, usually a highly emotional discipline ascribed to the field of humanities, armed with impartial mathematics.

History is a collective memory, yet even our own memory sometimes errs, and no real memory extends beyond three generations. There are written sources, but each might easily prove a forgery. There are material remnants of an archaeological nature, but they may be misinterpreted.

Astronomy is precise by definition, and a history dating that can be calculated from information about eclipses should satisfy any researcher. Yet the XIX century astronomers did not use the lunar tidal friction term in the equations of lunar motion, which would make ancient lunar eclipses appear several hours off the mark and relocate several total eclipses of the sun geographically (assuming tidal friction has remained the same all the time but there is no reason to believe it hasn’t). How could XIX-century calculations have conformed to consensual history?

I must say that a methodical recalculation of ancient eclipse datings shall invariably bring surprises; in the unlikely case these datings are correct, we shall prove the existence of erratic changes in the telluric rotation over the last 4,000 years instead. Both possibilities are highly alarming.

Fomenko demonstrates the incompatibility between consensual history and modern astronomy. This incompatibility is a sad fact. (He exposes a number of other contentious issues as well, but those do not fall into my professional scope.) Which is more reliable – history or hard-boiled scientific facts? Science cannot afford subjectivity; most of us would feel the same way about history as well.

Chronological problems are very serious indeed; Fomenko offers a viable solution to most of them, and a radical one at that – a “Copernican revolution” of history, no less. I am not using the term to predict the final and total victory of his version; that is a matter for a multitude of scientific and scholarly discussions to come. But the contradiction between history and astronomy that becomes graver with the day cannot and must not be tolerated in the best interests of both history and the theory of telluric rotation.

Fake Babilon Eclipses

There are not enough symbols, allowing astronomical interpretation of the symbols to change from one clay tablet to another. The clay tablets contain data about eclipses visible in Babylon that could have taken place every 30-40 years; they don’t allow their exact pinpointing on the time axis.

An eclipse can easily be found for each allegedly ancient event mentioned in a clay cylinder or tablet of unknown age. Consequently, the dates of eclipses are attached in a circular manner.

Dr. Stephenson argues that ancient dates of Babilon eclipses coincide with dates of Babilon eclipses described in Ptolemy’s Almagest, which was a late medieval phantom cover for Tycho Brahe and Kepler but forgets to mention that Almagest composed in the XVI century describes events of X-XVI centuries. Circulus Vicious.

The Crime of Claudius Ptolemy Hardcover – September 1, 1977, by Professor Robert R. Newton

Why tamper with history?

By the middle of the XVIth century, the prime political agenda of Europe, which already had reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Empire of Eurasia.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

The concerted effort of European aristocracy and black and white Catholic clergy despite the severe fight with Protestants, humanists, and scientists in the XV-XVII centuries – the creation and dissemination of ideas of the fictional Ancient world and Dark Ages served this agenda perfectly.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2.

The fictional Ancient World that was created by black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists, and scientists served their particular agendas too by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before according to the ancient authorities they invented and the sources they wrote under aliases.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

The European aristocracy, i.e. partly fugitives from Byzantine and partly inheritors of the former Eurasian warlords, justified thus their claims of self-rule for their lands, the Roman Curia declared its priority over the orthodoxy of the Evil Empire, Protestants, humanists, and scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.

LOOK INSIDE History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

The Breakthrough New Chronology books published in the USA open new perspectives to check the veracity of history by applying mathematics, statistics, and astronomy in the same manner as they were applied to genetics.

Indeed, the time has come to check chronology scientifically as it is the true foundation of history. Moreover, world history must not serve Judeo-Christian, Eurocentric, or any other agenda, it must become the rocket science reporting irrefutably the past of home sapience species.

Has history been tampered with ?

Refutation of the article in Wikipedia about the New Chronology

History: Fiction or Science? Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology by Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb W. Nosovskiy | Sep 3, 2023, Part of: the series History: Fiction or Science? (29 books),

Chron8-TOC

Table of Contents V7

History: Fiction or Science? Mediæval World Empire • Conquest of the Promised Land (New Chronology Vol.6

Table of Contents V6

History: Fiction of Science?: Conquest of the world. Europe. China. Japan. Russia (Chronology) (Volume 5)

Table of Contents V5

History: Fiction or Science? Russia. Britain. Byzantium. Rome. New Chronology vol.4.

Table of Contents V4

History: Fiction or Science? Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Ptolemy’s Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Copernicus. The Egyptian zodiacs. New Chronology vol.3.

Table of Contents V3

History: Fiction or Science? The dynastic parallelism method. Rome. Troy. Greece. The Bible. Chronological shifts. New Chronology Vol.2

Table of Contents V2

History: Fiction or Science? Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses and zodiacs. New Chronology Vol.I, 2nd revised Expanded Edition.

Table of Contents V1

Also by Anatoly T. Fomenko

(List is non-exhaustive)

Differential Geometry and Topology
Plenum Publishing Corporation. 1987. USA, Consultants Bureau, New York and London.
Variational Principles in Topology. Multidimensional Minimal Surface Theory
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Topological variational problems. – Gordon and Breach, 1991.
Integrability and Nonintegrability in Geometry and Mechanics
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1988.
The Plateau Problem. vols.1, 2
Gordon and Breach, 1990. (Studies in the Development of Modern Mathematics.)
Symplectic Geometry.Methods and Applications.
Gordon and Breach, 1988. Second edition 1995.
Minimal surfaces and Plateau problem. Together with Dao Chong Thi
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Integrable Systems on Lie Algebras and Symmetric Spaces. Together with V. V. Trofimov. Gordon and Breach, 1987.
The Geometry of Minimal Surfaces in Three-Dimensional Space. Together with A. A.Tuzhilin
USA, American Mathematical Society. In: Translation of Mathematical Monographs. vol.93, 1991.
Topological Classification of Integrable Systems. Advances in Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6
USA, American Mathematical Society, 1991.
Tensor and Vector Analysis: Geometry, Mechanics, and Physics. – Taylor and Francis, 1988.
Algorithmic and Computer Methods for Three-Manifolds. Together with S.V.Matveev
Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
Topological Modeling for Visualization. Together with T. L. Kunii. – Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Modern Geometry. Methods and Applications. Together with B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov
Springer-Verlag, GTM 93, Part 1, 1984; GTM 104, Part 2, 1985. Part 3, 1990, GTM 124.
The basic elements of differential geometry and topology. Together with S. P. Novikov
Kluwer Acad. Publishers, The Netherlands, 1990.
Integrable Hamiltonian Systems: Geometry, Topology, Classification. Together with A. V. Bolsinov
Taylor and Francis, 2003.
Empirical-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating.
Vol.1: The Development of the Statistical Tools. Vol.2: The Analysis of Ancient and Medieval
Records. – Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands, 1994.
Geometrical and Statistical Methods of Analysis of Star Configurations. Dating Ptolemy’s
Almagest. Together with V. V Kalashnikov., G. V. Nosovsky. – CRC-Press, USA, 1993.
New Methods of Statistical Analysis of Historical Texts. Applications to Chronology. Antiquity in the Middle Ages. Greek and Bible History. Vols.1, 2, 3. – The Edwin Mellen Press. The USA. Lewiston.
Queenston. Lampeter, 1999.
Mathematical Impressions. – American Mathematical Society, USA, 1990.