“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”– George Orwell, 1984.
By the middle of the XVIth century, the prime political agenda of Europe, that has reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the yoke and control of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia.
According to population genetics and anthropology, our homo sapiens subspecies sapiens (anatomically modern humans H.s.s) has grown to the alleged population of 7.5 billion from a group of 200-300 persons that appeared in Africa 120-150 000 years ago and moved back and forth through Sinai to Eurasia.
The population counter of the UN Institute of the population is badly out of order as it takes into account manipulated numbers supplied by China, India, and Pakistan. China claims 1,4, India 1.4 billion citizens. Both numbers are fictional made to order of their ruling powers, used as propaganda, and badly marry with facts.
The population of 20 major cities in China is 250 million, 50% of the population live in cities, grain production 500 mln tons, rice 200 mln tons. The average per head consumption including transformation is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 700 million.
The population of 20 major cities in India is 75 million, 15% of the population live in cities, grain production 300 mln tons, rice 200 mln tons. The average per head consumption including transformation is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 500 million.
Corollary: the actual population is closer to 5 than 8 billion people.
H.s. sapiens subspecies has barely survived the Ice Age that started 110 000 years ago and finished 10 000 years ago but was followed by “stimulating” Little Ice Ages and volcanic eruptions. We enter by 2020 into New Little Ice Age, increased climate instability, and volcanic activity.
Europe had good luck with the early medieval warm period from 850 to 1350 followed by the Little Ice Age of 1350 to 1850 that literally pushed it into Renaissance and Enlightenment, induced scientific and technical superiority compared to Eurasia.
The present Chart of climate waves is based on ice core probes from Greenland is irrefutable, historical legends referred thereto are not. Being based on erroneous chronology invented in the XVII century all events, empires, kingdoms prior to the XVI century “related” in consensual history are alleged.
Homo sapience species started in 2020 to reduce their population to the limits imposed by survival parameters and the size of the planet Earth in the Solar system.
In the middle of the twentieth century an American mathematician, physicist, and cyberneticist Heinz von Foerster deduced the formula of civilization of homo sapience. Around the same time, the Belgian physicist Ilya Prigogine, 1977 Nobel prize answered the question: Why does the complication of systems, that is, evolution, happen in nature?
Studying the population data available to him from different eras, Heinz von Foerster was surprised to find that a very simple mathematical formula describes population growth on the planet. You can count the number of people on earth in any year of our era. For it is enough to substitute the desired year into the formula.
Why should population size be subject to any formula? It’s even outrageous! Are people unintelligent species that grow in the Petri dish per simple mathematical law, describing the curve? In different eras on the planet, there were thousands of different races, nationalities, and nations. They united in states with different religions, cultures, languages, customs, and laws.
They fought, made alliances, or vice versa, or did not know about the existence of each other. They thought about different things and lived differently. They had different sorrows, victories, and defeats. They created the greatest works of art, studied the world, loved and hated.
It turns out that none of this matters at all. All human history which we diligently study at school, turned out to be just a candy wrapper with a multi-colored pattern of events. The pattern may vary but doesn’t affect the candy.
It doesn’t really matter what people have done or haven’t done throughout the history of humanity. It turned out that nothing depended on them. They were carried by a huge wave of natural law that none of them could influence.
According to the law of hyperbolic function, this is a significant blind natural element that increased the number of people on the planet. It turned out that different cultures and peoples scattered around the planet, not even knowing about each other, represent a single system, one physical whole.
It is fashionable to talk about different civilizations on our planet: Chinese, Russian, American, and other civilizations. However, the discovery of Heinz von Foerster and other scientists who rushed to study a strange phenomenon was arbitrarily refuted by historians.
It turned out that the difference in cultures and customs is entirely unimportant to the national characters and the very history of different peoples. Because all this represents parts of one whole, elements of earthly civilization, growing and living by the same law.
Our civilization is an integral organism, a creature, the same as a person. We can look under the microscope at the individual cells of the human body and see how strongly the cells of the liver are different from nerve cells, but at the same time understand that this is one organism.
By creating land and sea networks to reach new territories and develop commerce humans ensure an exchange of deadly illnesses, and plagues. See Silk Road that brought the bubonic plague to Europe, and decimated half of its population. See conquest by Spain of Americas that ruined Aztecs and Incas, decimated their populations but brought in exchange malaria and syphilis back.
By XXI century Agriculture turns into Agroindustry. To raise the output of poultry, pork, and beef, it adds antibiotics and hormones. To raise profits it squeezes hens, swine, and cattle into boxes and cages, it reduces their lifespan with genetic engineering.
To make superprofits humans don’t spare their own health. AKA by replacing sugar in soft drinks with sweeteners and introducing fast foods that contain glutamate, which turn consumers into fast-food addicts, humans become overweight diabetics and reduce their multiplication.
Following the raising of living, social and educational standards of the population women limit the number of children they bear. LGBT movement turns sex, religion, and childbearing into a farce.
By 2020 vested interest start an operation of the reduction of the population worldwide. Mass media runs an unbridled fearmongering pandemics campaign. Governments are pushed into lockdowns that damage the world economy and the livelihoods of millions.
According to population genetics and anthropology, our homo sapiens subspecies sapiens (anatomically modern humans H.s.s) has grown to the alleged population of 7.5 billion from a group of 200-300 persons that appeared in Africa 120-150 000 years ago and moved back and forth through Sinai to Eurasia, Australia, North and South America.
H.s.s were formed as aggressive and prone to multiplication in geometrical progression species. It had its cognitive revolution and reached as the hunter-gatherer the top ladder of mammal species by the end of the Ice Age that was blocking its multiplication. Ice Age ended 12 000 years ago, and the omnivore species began an agricultural revolution to unfold its multiplication capacities.
Population growth led to the domestication of plants and animals and permanent settlements that turned into kingdoms and empires that invented script, money, and religions. Neither wars nor plagues couldn’t stop this growth.
Scientific, industrial revolutions and social revolutions that took place 500, 200, and 100 years have on one hand ago accelerated the growth of the population, and on the other produced ways and means for conflicts between kingdoms, empires, and ideologies.
The global population is actually increasing by about 1.5 percent per year, a growth rate (should it persist) that in less than half a century will double the number of people who live on the planet.
Modern medical techniques are producing life extension but not healthy life extension, and we are seeing numbers of old and chronically sick or disabled elderly people in increasingly longer economically unproductive retirements, they are the first to die in covid pandemics.
The ability of the Earth to sustain the human population, posed by Malthus over 200 years ago, is a serious question. Food and energy demands are increasing. Dependence on finite resources for energy and water is already threatening international stability. Exponential population growth can only make matters worse.
Improving economic development in the most populous countries of the developing world (India, China) is leading to changing patterns of demand, as people seek more affluent lifestyles. Consequently, the birth rate is decreasing there.
Air quality resulting from over-rapid industrialization is becoming a major problem that will have major public health effects. The likely determinants of climate change, usually attributed to the developed nations, are now spread throughout the developing world, making the ability of nations to achieve the targets signed up at Kyoto unlikely to be achieved.
Rather than simply equating population policy with family planning, the new thinking is that population growth should be stabilized – and development enhanced – by attacking some of the roots of the problem: by improving women’s access to education, health care, and economic and political decisions.
Examples from various cultures
China has operated a one-child policy for a number of years, enforced through a system of fines, relaxed after mass bereavements such as the Sichuan Earthquake; the focus of China on population control helps provide better health services for women and a reduction in the risks of death and injury associated with pregnancy.
At family planning offices, women receive free contraception and pre-natal classes. Help is provided for pregnant women to closely monitor their health. Culturally, the traditional religious practice requires a son to perform the parents’ funerals, leading to resistance to the policy in some rural areas when the firstborn is a girl.
Growth has indeed slowed, yet during 1996 China added 13 million people to its numbers. Rural folk has been less cooperative; however, the one-child policy has achieved statistical wonders. In one generation, China’s birth rates have plunged to 1.9 children per mother – a rate that, if sustained, will lead to depopulation.
According to a recent survey, ethnic minorities are currently growing about 7 times faster than Han Chinese. The Chinese government has canceled the one-child law in June 2021.
The decline in population growth rate has exacerbated another problem familiar in the West: rapid aging. There will be 129 million Chinese over the age of 60 as of the year 2000. By 2020, one in four will be elderly (twice the total present population of the United States) – a rare burden for a low-income country.
The sex ratio at birth (between male and female births) in mainland China reached 117:100 in the year 2000, substantially higher than the natural baseline, which ranges between 103:100 and 107:100. This suggests differential abortion if the sex is known antenatally.
India operates a two-child policy. During the 1970s they used forced sterilization of the poor. India has greatly increased food production per head over the last 20 years, making it better placed to absorb higher numbers. The country’s most recent approach to population issues focuses on the advancement of women economically, academically, and socially, as independent women are more likely to have small families.
Africa: birth rates in Africa are the highest in the world. By the year 2050, twenty percent of the world’s population will live on the African continent. That will be almost two thousand million people, up from eight hundred fifty-five million people today. Especially large population growth is expected in Nigeria, Ethiopia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Other countries likely to have major growth include Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Somalia, and Uganda.
Kenya was the first country in sub-Saharan Africa to view runaway population growth as a serious impediment to economic prosperity, and it became the first, in the late 1960s, to begin developing a national family-planning campaign. The country’s official population policy calls for matching population size with available resources, yet leaves decisions on family size up to individual families.
As recently as 1970, Africa was essentially self-sufficient in food. What fostered a breakdown in the continent’s ability to feed itself has been a decline of nearly 1 percent per year in per capita grain production since 1968 – in part due to annual population growth for the continent approaching 3 percent.
The root cause of Africa’s crisis, according to Worldwatch Institute analyst Lester Brown, is population growth faster than on any continent in history, widespread soil erosion and desertification, and a failure by African governments to adequately support agriculture. Europe: by contrast, France offers financial incentives for larger (3 children) families.
The population of Europe is also aging faster than any other part of the world, except Japan. Birth rates are also down in many European countries. The number of people depending on workers will rise as the number of workers falls. Spending in European countries will have to increase for retirement, health care, and long-term care for old people in the future.
Russia faces the most severe population decrease of any country. The population of Russia is now one hundred forty-three million. It is expected to drop twenty-two percent over the next forty-five years. If this happens, Russia could lose more than forty percent of its active workforce and have economic problems. Part of the problem is the short length of time that Russian men generally live.
The average life expectancy for Russian men is just sixty-six years. Russian women live eleven years longer. Men in Western Europe live sixteen years longer. Drugs, tobacco smoking, and alcohol are some of the main causes of death among Russian men. Russia also has low birth rates.
to be continued..
The coronavirus epidemic in China that turned by 2020 into a pandemic in the global village is an inevitable product of globalization.
The Covid-19 pandemic is allegedly the only reason for the lockdowns in the countries producing over 85% of the world GDP with a population of 4.7 billion.
Lockdowns in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, and Japan have stopped the epidemics. with draconian quarantine measures, availability of medical manpower, equipment, and hospitals.
Lockdowns in democratic countries that either can’t apply complete quarantine or don’t have adequate medical manpower, equipment, and hospital beds or both may prove to be much more destructive than constructive.
The allegation that pandemics originated in the centralized state capitalism of communist China is irrelevant. As China became 2020 the largest manufacturing economy and exporter of goods, the severing of the supply chains leads to the contraction of the world GDP and social unrest.
The epidemic of SARS in 2002-2003 did not cross the borders of China and did not turn into a pandemic. In 2002 China was just the i4th manufacturing economy in the world. Nowadays it is the first one. Will China become the only one by 2025?
Fact 03 – Spanish flu January 1918 – December 1920
An unusually deadly pandemic involving the H1N1 virus affected 500 million people or about 27% of the world population of between 1.8 billion with the death toll as high as 100 million young adults.
Massive programs of vaccination in 1895-1918 based on the research of Louis Pasteur, Ferdinand Cohn, and Robert Koch, founders of microbiology and bacteriology, coincide with 15-18 years time-lag with the Spanish flu pandemic with the high mortality rate for young adults.
Hypothesis 02 – Coronavirus to write off the world debt
World powers have found a solution to delete the global debt. Indeed, The top borrowers in the world – the United States, China, Europe, and Japan—account for 3/4 of global debt, exceeding by 50% their share of global output.
Ways and Means for debtor nations
a) Create and/or use a flu pandemic;
b) Declare the pandemic as a force majeure;
c) Declare climate change as a force majeure;
d) delete your nation’s debts;
Under the cloak of a big pandemic and climate change, the world powers will deglobalize and restructure world production and trade and sweep under the carpet 500 trillion of debt and some senior population.
Forecast for 2020
a) expected infection (I) in 2021 up to 200 million;
b) expected death rate of 2% from corona; (D);
c) expected number of death in 2020, I x D = 4 million,
AKA compares well with Spanish flu 1918-20
Fact: an annual average of 500 000 flu deaths in 2009-2019;
Hypothesis 03 – Origin of COVID pandemic
An optimistic case. Genetical engineering research on the military, political, and/or ideological competing agenda in China, USA, Israel, UK, and Russia. A man-made virus always has an antidote vaccine to be released upon the achievement of objectives of the agenda. The population accepts massive vaccination, even if it has infertility as a side effect. Controlled reduction of the world population to the size defined by the agenda.
A pessimistic case. Pandemic as a result of mutation of coronavirus uncontrolled by humans. Genetical engineering research develops ASAP a vaccine against Covid-19 that may have infertility as a side effect. AKA, vaccines against Ebola or AIDS stop Covid-19 but has infertility as collateral. Uncontrolled reduction of the world population by die-outs until it develops immunity. The size of the reduction is a guess.
History will repeat itself. Surviving historians will rewrite history to suit the surviving powers.
Population statistics wargame
The population of 20 major cities in China is 250 million, 50% of the population lives in cities, grain production is 500 million tons, and rice is 200 million tons. The average per head consumption including transformation is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 700 million.
The population of 20 major cities in India is 75 million, 15% of the population lives in cities, grain production is 300 mln tons, and rice is 200 mln tons. The average per head consumption including transformation is 1 ton per annum. The population estimate does not exceed 500 million.
Corollary: the actual population is closer to 6 than 8 billion people.
H.s. sapiens subspecies has barely survived the Ice Age that started 110 000 years ago and finished 10 000 years ago but was followed by “stimulating” Little Ice Ages and volcanic eruptions. We enter 2020 into New Little Ice Age, increased climate instability, and volcanic activity.
Europe had good luck with the early medieval warm period from 850 to 1350 followed by the Little Ice Age of 1350 to 1850 which literally pushed it into the Renaissance and Enlightenment, and induced scientific and technical superiority compared to Eurasia. From 1452 to 1850 Europeans colonized the Globe.
The present Chart of climate waves is based on ice core probes from Greenland is irrefutable, historical legends referred thereto are not. Being based on erroneous chronology invented in the XVII century all events, empires, and kingdoms prior to the XVI century “related” in consensual history are alleged.
The basic assumption is that a text that describes a sequence of events will devote more space to more important events (for example, a period of war or unrest will have much more text devoted to it) than a period of peaceful, non-eventful years) and that this irregularity will remain visible in other descriptions of the period.
For each analyzed text, a function is devised that maps each year mentioned in the text with the number of pages (lines, letters) devoted in the text to its description (which could be zero). The function of the two texts is then compared.
For example, the allegedly contemporary history of Rome written by Titus Livius with a modern history of Rome written by Russian historian V. S. Sergeev, have a high correlation, and thus that they describe the same period of history, which is undisputed.
When modern texts which describe different periods are compared, we have a low correlation, as expected. However, when the allegedly ancient history of Rome and the irrefutable medieval history of Rome are compared, we have a high correlation. The conclusion is that the ancient history of Rome is a copy of the medieval history of Rome. Thus, ancient Rome did not exist; it is a version written in the middle ages.
Statistical correlation of dynasties
Two dynasties of rulers using statistical methods are compared. First, a database of rulers containing relevant information on each of them. For each pair of the rulers, are created “survey codes” which contain a number that describes a degree of the match of each considered property of two rulers.
For example, one of the properties is the way of death: if two rulers were both poisoned, they get the value of +1 in their property of the way of death; if one ruler was poisoned and another killed in combat, they get -1; and if one was poisoned, and another died of illness, they get 0 (there is a possibility that chroniclers were not impartial and that different descriptions nonetheless describe the same person). An important property is the length of the rule.
A number of pairs of unrelated dynasties are listed – for example, dynasties of kings of Israel and emperors of the late Western Roman Empire (AD 300-476) – and claimed that this method demonstrates correlations between their reigns. (Graphs that show just the length of the rule in the two dynasties are the most widely known; however, Dr. Fomenko’s conclusions are also based on other parameters, as described above.)
Dr. Fomenko also claims that the regnal history from the 17th to 20th centuries never shows a correlation of “dynastic flows” with each other. Therefore, Fomenko insists history was multiplied and outstretched into imaginary antiquity to justify this or other “royal” pretensions.
Fomenko uses for the demonstration of correlation between the reigns exclusively the data from the Chronological Tables of J. Blair (Moscow 1808–09). Fomenko says that Blair’s tables are all the more valuable to us since they were compiled in an epoch adjacent to the time of Scaligerian chronology. According to Fomenko, these tables contain clearer signs of “Scaligerite activity,” which were subsequently buried under layers of paint and plaster by historians of the 19th and 20th centuries.
Fomenko examines astronomical events described in ancient texts and claims that the chronology is actually medieval:
Fomenko says that the mysterious drop in the value of the lunar acceleration parameter D” (“a linear combination of the [angular] accelerations of the Earth and Moon”) between AD 700–1300, according to the American astronomer Robert Newton could not be explained in terms of “non-gravitational” (i.e., tidal) forces.
By eliminating those anomalous early eclipses the New Chronology produces a constant value of D” beginning around AD 1000. Conclusion: alleged eclipses that accompanied key events of the world history did not take place neither in location nor in time alleged in ancient chronicles of which the originals have disappeared.
Fomenko associates initially the Star of Bethlehem with the AD 1140 (±20) supernova (now the Crab Nebula) and the Crucifixion Eclipse with the total solar eclipse of AD 1170 (±20). He also believes that the Crab Nebula supernova could not have been seen in AD 1054 but probably in AD 1153. He connects it with the total eclipse of AD 1186.
Fomenko refutes archeoastronomy as a fallacious circular exercise based on the erroneous clerical chronology of Jesuits Scaliger and Petavius. Fomenko holds in strong doubt the veracity of ancient Chinese astronomical data.
Fomenko pursues the research of Robert R. Newton and argues that the star catalog in the Almagest, ascribed to the Hellenistic astronomer Claudius Ptolemy, was compiled in the 15th to 16th centuries AD.
With this objective in sight, he develops new methods of dating old stellar catalogs and claims that the Almagest is based on data collected between AD 600 and 1300, whereby the telluric obliquity is well taken into account.
Fomenko refines and completes Morozov’s analysis of some ancient horoscopes, most notably, the so-called Dendera Zodiacs—two horoscopes drawn on the ceiling of the temple of Hathor — and comes to the conclusion that they correspond to either the 11th or the 13th century AD.
Fomenko makes computer-aided dating of all 37 Egyptian horoscopes that contain sufficient astronomical data and claims they all fit into the 11th to the 19th-century timeframe. Traditional history usually either interprets these horoscopes as belonging to the 1st century BC or suggests that they weren’t meant to match any date at all.
In his final analysis of an eclipse triad described by the ancient Greek Thucydides in History of the Peloponnesian War, Fomenko dates the eclipses to AD 1039, 1046, and 1057. Because of the layered structure of the manuscript, he claims that Thucydides actually lived in medieval times, and in describing the Peloponnesian War between the Spartans and Athenians, he was actually describing the conflict between the medieval Navarrans and Catalans in Spain from AD 1374 to 1387.
Fomenko claims that the abundance of dated astronomical records in cuneiform texts from Mesopotamia is of little use for the dating of events, as the astronomical phenomena they describe recur cyclically every 30–40 years.
Fomenko points out that the texts of Babylonian astronomical diaries, with records of precise astronomical observations of the Moon and planets, were dated in XVI-XVIII centuries in terms of the reigns of alleged historical figures taken from the chronological tables of Scaliger and Petavius.
Astronomical retro calculations are clearly circular as observations registered on clay tablets, and cylinders are dated not from astronomical information therein contained, but from the alleged rulers’ reigns, to within a single day, which was taken from Scaliger and Petavius tables.
Thus the dates obtained agree with the accepted chronology. Thus archaeoastronomer F. R. Stephenson has ‘demonstrated’ through a systematic study of a large number of Babylonian, Ancient and Medieval European, and Chinese records of eclipse observations from Almagest of Ptolemy that they can be dated consistently with the conventional chronology of Scaliger and Petavius at least as far back as 600 BCE.
Dr. Stephenson claims to have destroyed the basis of the New Chronology thanks to the data of eclipses from Babylonian clay tablets and antediluvian Chinese records. This ‘destruction’ is fallacious as there is no vocabulary of Babylonian astronomical symbols produced that can be applied to clay tablets for the extraction of unique dates of eclipses allegedly written on them.
Astronomical data therein contained is not sufficient for irrefutable non-circular dating. Either there are not enough symbols allowing for unique astronomical interpretation, or the symbols change from one clay tablet to another. The clay tablets contain data about eclipses visible in Babylon that could have taken place every 30-40 years, therefore don’t allow their exact pinpointing on the time axis.
An eclipse can easily be found for each allegedly ancient event mentioned in a clay cylinder or tablet, the age of which is an alleged one also. Consequently, the dates of eclipses are attached to tablets in a circular manner. On the contrary, Zodiacs from Egyptian Temples contain abundant astrological, i.e., astronomical information that is sufficient for non-circular unique dating. See Contents of Part 2, vol.III.
Dr. Stephenson argues: that ancient dates of Babilon eclipses coincide with dates of Babilon eclipses described in Ptolemy’s Almagest but forgets to mention that Almagest composed in XVI describes events of X-XVI centuries. Dr. R.R.Newton called Ptolemy “the most successful fraud in the history of science. “Circulus Vicious.
Rejection of common dating methods
On archaeological dating methods, Fomenko claims:
“Archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical, and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact, circular, and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century.” — Anatoly Fomenko, History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology 1) [Second edition].
Dendrochronology is rejected with a claim that the dating of objects much older than the oldest still living trees, it isn’t an absolute but a relative dating method and thus dependent on traditional chronology. Fomenko specifically points to a break of dendrochronological scales around AD 1000.
The dendrochronological sequences beginning with living trees from various parts of North America and Europe cannot be extended back 12,400 years into the past. Both relative and a fully anchored dendrochronology series going back past 1000 AD are fallacious as based on a non-significant number of samples.
Fomenko also cites a number of cases where carbon dating of a series of objects of known age gave significantly different dates. He also alleges undue cooperation between physicists and archaeologists in obtaining the dates since most radiocarbon dating labs only accept samples with an age estimate suggested by historians or archaeologists.
Fomenko also claims that carbon dating over the range of AD 1 to 2000 is inaccurate because it has too many sources of error that are either guessed at or completely ignored and that calibration is done with a statistically meaningless number of samples.
Moreover, initial calibrations of the radiocarbon dating method were made in the Arizona University laboratory on wooden samples delivered and dated ad hoc by an archaeological expedition of 1955-57 of the same Arizona University to Sinai, Egypt. Consequently, Fomenko concludes that carbon dating in its present form based on fallacious initial calibrations curves is circular and not accurate enough to be used on the historical scale.
Fomenko rejects numismatic dating as circular, being based on the traditional chronology, and points to cases of similar coins being minted in distant periods, unexplained long periods with no coins minted, and cases of mismatch of numismatic dating with historical accounts.
The research of earth-moon telluric rotation by the late chief astrophysicist of NASA Robert Russel Newton leads mathematicians of MSU to a breakthrough in the chronology of world history. The timeline of the civilization based exclusively on irrefutably dated events and artifacts shrinks to approximately 1000 years, key events find their true place on the time axis.
The erroneous chronology we live with was essentially crafted by Kabbalist Scaliger and Jesuit Petavius in the XVI-XVII from the contradictory mix of the copies of ancient Latin, Greek, Hebraic and Aramaic manuscripts (all originals have mysteriously disappeared) cemented by the authority of the Church Fathers.
The most probable prototype of the historical Jesus was Andronikos I Komnenos (allegedly AD 1183 to 1185), the Emperor of Byzantine, reflected in the consensual history for his numerous failed reforms; his traits and deeds are reflected in ‘biographies’ of many real and imaginary persons. According to New Chronology, the New Testament is the rendition of religious events of the XIIth century AD.
Crusades of 1189-1192 AD and 1199-1204 AD to Jerusalem-Constantinople were military operations under the banner of Christianity by the followers and relatives of Jesus alias Emperor Andronicus killed during a religious mutiny. Crusades have ended with the Sack of Constantinople in 1204.
The historical Jesus Christ is a composite figure and reflection of the Bible prophet Elisha, Osiris, the god of death, life, and resurrection, Pope Gregory VII, Saint Basil of Caesarea, and even Li Yuanhao (“Son of Heaven”), Euclides, Dionysius and Andronikos I Komnenos, the emperor of Byzantine.
The seemingly vast differences in the biographies of these figures result from a difference in languages, points of view, and time frame of the authors of said accounts and biographies. The historical Jesus Christ – Andronikos I Komnenos – may have been crucified around 1185 AD on Joshua’s Hill, overlooking the straits of Bosphorus following mutiny caused by the conflict of religious ideas.
Astronomical phenomena reflected in the New Testament as the Star of Bethlehem that coincides with the Crab supernova explosion in 1152 A.D., the full solar eclipse in 1185 A.D. during the alleged Crucifixion support them as key dates in the life of Jesus Christ. The same dates included in the Zodiacs and horoscope of Egyptian Temples relative to Osiris reinforce further the credibility of the advanced key dates.
The Bible idem the Old Testament was composed in Latin from the Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew sources in XV-XVI representing the events of the XIII – XVII centuries AD in Europe and Byzantine as very ancient ones. The Old Testament contains doctrines, dogmas, axioms, ideas, hints of social order, and “prophecies” about “future” events described in the New Testament.
Excerpts from the Bible were read in Latin to the public by the priests from the pulpits of Catholic Cathedrals. Roman Curia opposed the translation and circulation of the Bible up to the XVII (i.e. Tyndale was burned at a stake). The invention of printing by Gutenberg in 1455 AD led to the availability of the New and Old Testaments all over Europe.
The Bible was translated into European languages and mass distributed starting XVI. The availability of the Gospels and Scriptures in native languages led to the conflict of the interpretations of texts therein contained between the Church and the Bible. The Bible became the main instrument of the Protestant Reformation.
The New Chronology of religions runs as follows: polytheism followed by monotheism in the pre-Christian period (before the XIth and the figurehead of Jesus Christ), Dionysus-Bacchus Christianity (XIth and XIIth before and after the life of Jesus), Christendom (XIIth to XIVth centuries) and its subsequent mutations into Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, Protestantism, Judaism (sic!) and, Islam (sic!) in XIVth to XVIth centuries.
Antiquity as prime Agenda of Europe
By the middle of the XVI century the prime political agenda of Europe that already has reached superiority in Sciences and Technologies, but was still inferior militarily, was to free itself from the control of the Empire of Eurasia.
The concerted effort of European aristocracy, black and white Catholic clergy despite the severe fight with Protestants, humanists, and scientists in the XV-XVII centuries – the creation and dissemination of ideas of the fictional Ancient World and Dark Ages served this agenda perfectly.
The fictional Ancient World that was created by black and white Catholic clergy, Protestants, humanists, and scientists served their particular agendas too by representing events of XI-XVI centuries as ones that happened thousands of years before according to the ancient authorities they invented and the sources they wrote under aliases.
The European aristocracy, i.e. partly fugitives from Byzantine and partly inheritors of the former Eurasian warlords, justified thus their claims of self-rule for their lands, the Roman Curia declared its priority over the orthodoxy of the Evil Empire, Protestants, humanists and scientists prepared the Enlightenment under the cover of Antiquity.
The Breakthrough New Chronology books published in the USA open new perspectives to check the veracity of History by application of mathematics, statistics, and astronomy in the same manner as they were applied to genetics.
Indeed, the time has come to check chronology scientifically as it is the true foundation of history. Moreover, world history must not serve Judeo-Christian, Eurocentric or any other agenda, it must become the rocket science reporting irrefutably the past of homo sapience species.
Starting today from 23:00 to 05:00 Vatican rented from Elon MUSK for 1 billion USD a satellite to measure with lasers the temperature of the population (rectally). Please stick your bottom out of the open window towards the stars. Hold an open ID in your right hand. https://evilempireblog.com/black-death-syphilis
The irregular behavior of parameter D” in the Earth-Moon telluric system discovered in 1971 by Dr. Robert R. Newton, chief astrophysicist of NASA proves irrefutably that solar eclipses of alleged antiquity reported to us in the “ancient” chronicles were actually medieval or fictitious. Conclusion: either astronomy or the chronology of history is wrong.
Case A: the Sun-Earth-Moon telluric system became stable only after the XIII century. That is astronomically impossible.
Case B: 1000 years ago civilization homo sapience didn’t exist, therefore people could not write as yet (sic!) to register exactly the events of the full solar eclipses. This is possible but contradicts the consensual chronology of world history completely.
Corollary:the consensual chronology elaborated by Scaliger and Petavious is wrong.
The strange leap of parameter D” in the theory of lunar motion
Nowadays we have special calculation tables – the so-called canons – whose compilation was based on the theory of lunar motion. They contain the date of each eclipse, the area to be covered by the lunar shadow, the phase, etc. See the famous astronomical canon of Ginzel, for instance. If an ancient text describes some eclipse in enough detail, we can determine what characteristics of the eclipse had been observed – the phase, the geographical area that the shadow passes over, etc.
The comparison of these characteristics to the referential ones contained in the tables may give a concurrence with an eclipse possessing similar characteristics. If this proves a success, we can date the eclipse. However, it may turn out that several eclipses from the astronomical canon don’t fit the description; in this case, the dating is uncertain. All the eclipses described in the “ancient” and medieval sources have been dated by the following method to some extent at least.
Nowadays the dates of the “ancient” eclipses are occasionally used in astronomical research. For instance, the theory of lunar motion has the notion of the so-called parameter D” – the second derivative of lunar elongation that characterizes acceleration. Let us remind the reader of the definition of elongation.
Fig. 2.1 shows the solar orbit of the Earth and the telluric orbit of the moon. The angle between the vectors ES and EM is called lunar elongation D – the angle between the lines of sight drawn from the Earth to the Sun and the moon. Apparently, it is time-dependent. An example of the elongation of Venus can be seen in the picture on the right. Maximal elongation is the angle where the line of sight as drawn from Earth to Venus (E’V’) touches the orbit of Venus. One has to note that the orbits in fig. 2.1 are shown as circular while being elliptic in reality – however, since the eccentricity is low here, the ellipses are schematically drawn as circles.
Fig. 2.1. Lunar elongation is the angle between the vectors ES and EM. The elongation of Venus is the angle between ES and EV. The maximal elongation of Venus is the angle between E’S and E’V’.
Some computational problems related to astronomy require the knowledge of lunar acceleration as it had been in the past. The problem of calculating parameter D” over a large time interval as a time function was discussed in detail by the Royal Society of London and the British Academy of Sciences in 1972, and swept under the carpet.
The calculation of the parameter D” was based on the following scheme: the equation parameters of lunar motion, including D”, are taken with their modern values and then varied in such a way that the theoretically calculated characteristics of ancient eclipses coincide with the ones given for dated eclipses in ancient documents.
Parameter D” is ignored for the calculation of actual eclipse dates, since the latter is a rougher parameter whose calculation does not require the exact knowledge of lunar acceleration. Alterations in lunar acceleration affect secondary characteristics of the eclipse, such as the shadow track left by the moon on the surface of the Earth, which may be moved sideways a little.
The time dependence of D” was first calculated by the eminent American astronomer Robert Russel Newton. According to him, parameter D” can be “defined well by the abundant information about the dates scattered over the interval from 700 B.C. until the present day” (, page 113). Newton calculated 12 possible values of parameter D”, having based them on 370 “ancient” eclipse descriptions.
Since R. Newton trusted Scaligerian chronology completely, it is little wonder that he took the eclipse dates from Scaligerian chronological tables. The results of R. Newton combined with the results obtained by Martin, who has processed about 2000 telescopic observations of the moon from the period of 1627-1860 (26 values altogether) have made it possible to draw an experimental time dependency curve for D”, qv fig. 2.2
Fig. 2.2. The D” graph calculated by Robert Newton. Parameter D” is measured here as seconds divided by century. Parameter D” performs a sudden leap on the interval of the alleged VI-XI centuries A.D. Taken from  and .
According to R. Newton, “the most stunning fact… is the drastic drop in D” that begins with 700 [A.D. – A. F.] and continues until about 1300… This drop implies the existence of a “square wave” in the osculating value of D”… Such changes in the behavior of D”, and such rates of these changes, cannot be explained by modern geophysical theories” (, page 114; ).
Robert Newton wrote an entire monograph titled Astronomical Evidence Concerning Non-Gravitational Forces In The Earth-Moon System () that was concerned with trying to prove this mysterious gap in the behavior of D”, which manifested as a leap by an entire numeric order. One has to note that these mysterious non-gravitational forces failed to manifest in any other way at all.
Having studied the graph that was drawn as a result of these calculations, R. Newton had to mark that “between the years (-700) and (+500), the value of D” remains the lowest as compared to the ones that have been observed for any other moment during the last 1000 years” (, page 114).
Newton proceeds to tell us that “these estimations combined with modern data tell one that D” may possess amazingly large values, and that it has been subject to drastic and sudden fluctuations over the last 2000 years, to such an extent that its value became inverted around 800 A.D.” (, page 115). This means that either the Moon changed its orbit dramatically during V to XI or Earth accelerated its rotation drastically. (sic!) .
The D” value drops suddenly, and this leap by an entire order begins in the alleged V century A.D.;
Beginning with the XI century and on, the values of the parameter D” become more or less constant and close to its modern value;
In the interval between the alleged V and XI centuries, A.D. one finds D” values to be in complete disarray.
Contrary to the Neutral Point of Opinion (NPOV, sic!) rule the mainstream lies in WIKI: “American astronomer Robert Newton had explained the drop of parameter D” in terms of “non-gravitational” (i.e., tidal) forces”, whereby Robert Newton says in the article they refer to: “There are no satisfactory explanations of the accelerations. Existing theories of tidal friction are quite inadequate.”
The strange behavior of parameter D” has a valid explanation within the paradigm of the New Chronology.
The consensual erroneous chronology was elaborated in the XVI-XVII centuries by kabbalist-numerologist Joseph Scaliger and his disciple Jesuit Dionysius Petavious. The mathematicians Dr. Fomenko and Dr. Nosovskiy have developed the theory of New Chronologythat explains this phenomenon and corrects the parameter D” but leads to the revision of chronology and world history.
The timeline of the civilization, based on New Chronology takes into account only the irrefutably dated non-contradictory events and artifacts, shrinks drastically to approximately 1000 years, and the key events move to their more probable place on the time axis. Сivilization is thereby defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication.
“[Historical] revisionism … only means bringing history into accord with facts.” Harry Elmer Barnes (American historian, 1889–1968)
Based on exact sciences, correction of chronology leads to the profound reconstruction of world history.
Timeline of “Evil” Empires of Homo Sapience Sapience species that is both aggressive and prone to multiplication in geometrical progression
The Civilization of homo sapiens species defined as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication is fairly young, and fits in a timeframe of barely 1000 years. New Chronology theory doesn’t deny Pyramids, Great Wall of China, and Notre Dame, but points to the more probable datings of events and artifacts on the time axis based on irrefutable data. Consensual chronology of events is refuted as erroneous, subjective and contrary to astronomy, physics, logic and statistics.
Homo sapience Evil Empire step by step
Homo sapience species moved step by step from natural selection to intelligent design. It survived the cognitive revolution around 100 000 years ago, the agricultural revolution approximately 10 000 years ago, the societal revolution 1500 years ago, the scientific revolution 500 years ago, and the industrial revolution 200 years ago. Will this species survive the artificial intelligence and genetic engineering revolutions? In the course of these revolutions, the species multiplied from 2 000 000 to 7.8 billion specimens and caused the massive extinction of plants and animals. Ancient World, Atlantis, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Persia, India, China, Aliens, and the ETes we are told about in thousands of books, and films, are fantasy. The key dates on the AD time axis based on New Chronology are presumed and approximate. The climatic periods are irrefutable as based on data from ice core deposits in Greenland and Antarctica. The major movements of populations during the last 100 000 across the globe are registered on haplogroups of billions of DNA samples collected in the last 50 years.
Claim A: The conditions of survival improved about 10 000 years with the end of the Ice Age ago, allowing the multiplication of species of homo sapience in geometrical progression. The species began about 500 AD its consecutive progress from bands of forages to clans, to tribes, to proto-states, to centralized governments, to proto-empires across Eurasia by 1000 AD, that competed for space and resources ending in the formation by 1300 AD of “Evil” Empire of Eurasia that ruled the lands.
Claim B:This Superempire subsequently disintegrated within the next 300 years due to various speeds of intellectual and technological development in the competing parts. Western European part of the “Evil” Empire, far 2,000 km from the Tsar-Grad (placeholder Rome) from the XV century, started to turn astrology into astronomy, witchcraft into healthcare, and religion into Science and reached superiority in all domains. The placeholder Rome located in Constantinople, was initially moved in 1300 to Novgorod (Yaroslavl) and moved by 1500 to Moscow.
Claim C: Western Europe, AKA the offspring of the “Mongolian” Horde, managed the deconstruction of Tsar-Grad and started their liberation from the colonization made by their progenitors. The Tsar-Grad was moved in the XVI century from Yaroslavl to Moscow, and the ruling “Mongol” elite was replaced by their puppets. Moreover, by the XVIII century, Western Europe had nearly been wiped out in a concerted effort from the memory of peoples of the former “Evil” Empire its very existence.
Claim D: The invention of mills to saw multiple boards from the logs, the invention of navigation instruments, and optical instruments XV-XVII in Western Europe allowed the building of ocean-going ships. Spain, Portugal, France, Holland, and England started the first industrial revolution, commerce, and overseas colonization. England nearly won this competition growing by the end of the XVIII century from the small underpopulated province of the “Evil” Empire of Eurasia that ruled the lands to a new “Evil” Empire of Great Britain that ruled the waves until the XX century.
First Epoch of Civilization: 500 – 800 AD.
According to archeo-anthropology, the modern species of homo sapiens appeared about 120 000 years ago. Bad or good luck for us, as the Ice Age started about the same time. We probably morphed into homo sapience and won the competition with other home species thanks to the Ice Age. Most of the Northern hemisphere became unfit for the survival of our species, so we had to move a lot.
The Ice Age ended barely 10 000 years ago, and the human hunter-gatherers that survived started to multiply and form clans and tribes in the deltas of the rivers of the Northern Hemisphere that were promising for the survival of species.
Ouf!We can survive and multiply at last! Populations practice fluvial agriculture, hunting, and fishing to compete for space and resources. That war, our first and last Paradise, lasted from 10 000 BC to 500 AD with an average lifespan of 30 years! Civilization as a hierarchical system consisting of state, army, ideology, religion, writing, and communication is inevitably coming to make our lifespan longer and us cleverer! Fare thee well, Paradise! The pre-historyof Civilization starts in 500 AD!
The rising density of populations leads to the formation of social structures due to the selective competition between clans and tribes. The social structures of populations of deltas reached by 500 AD the level of the proto-states with centralized pyramidal governance. Proto-states compete with each other for space and resources. Now we have resources and spare time to fight our neighbors, to multiply and expand!
We are illiterate heathens and pagans as of yet. Multiple Little Ice Ages from 10 000 BC to 850 BC slowed the proliferation of homo sapience species in Northern and Central Europe but allowed for one in Southern Europe, North Africa, and Asia. Paganism rules. The Pre-history ends, and Civilization begins in 800 AD with the invention of hieroglyphical writing.
Critical Step: From Paganism, we move to Polytheism, AKA the system of dominant beliefs and worship practices that morph into structured religions.
Breakthrough: by 500 AD, humans invented and used non-metal basic instruments and simple weapons
Breakthrough: By 800 AD, we had just invented and started basic writing with hieroglyphs and cuneiforms that are difficult to learn and use, but they made registration of events, writing of, and control of execution of orders of the centralized authority feasible.
Critical Step: Proto-states in the Deltas of Nile and Euphrates rapidly grew into Kingdoms that expand to Mare Nostrum shores and Mesopotamia and fought with each other for space and resources. Civilization starts in 800 AD.
Critical Step: Proto-states in the Deltas of Nile and Euphrates rapidly grew into Kingdoms that expand to Mare Nostrum shores and Mesopotamia and fought with each other for space and resources. Proto-states in the Deltas of Ganges and the Yangtze rapidly grew into Kingdoms that expanded in India, Southeastern Asia, and China, competing for space and resources to turn into proto-empires. Civilization starts in 800 AD.
Breakthrough: Writing with hieroglyphs and cuneiforms on papyri, plaster, textile, clay, and stone supports make a centralized rule possible. Proto-states that appeared across Eurasia morphed at different speeds into kingdoms with pyramidal social structures.
The hieroglyphic and cuneiform writing is descriptive and unsuitable for the composition and communication of complicated phrases and long texts. It takes up to 10 years to learn, and it is difficult to teach and use. Nevertheless, it is sufficient for building a pyramidal social structure. Literacy is reserved for scribes and priests that serve the centralized authority.
Second Epoch: 800 – 1000 AD.
The Medieval Warm Period of 850-1350 AD begins in the Northern Hemisphere in 850 AD, therefore, the Kingdom of Egypt Kem expands further to the North, to the coastal Mediterranean and Minor Asia. Kem turns into Judea-Israel proto-Empire with the capital Yoros on Bosphorus and founds fiefs in Italy, Spain, France, England, Ireland, and Northern Europe.
Jerusalem of 1000 BC, Babilon of 2000 BC, Troy of 3000 BC, Constantinople of 500 AD, and Czar-grad of 1000 AD we told about in the consensual history are alleged and actually are the same placeholder Yoros in Byzantium. The Issue with Troy