Why weren’t there multiple | seasons of crucifixions?
Here are some reasons that AI quotes:
1. Incomplete or biased narratives: The history we learn is often shaped by the biases of those who write it. Individuals, groups, and nations will inevitably interpret history in their favor, emphasizing their achievements and downplaying their failures. This leads to incomplete and biased narratives that can overlook or delegitimize the experiences of other groups.
2. The role of power and politics: Historical knowledge can be manipulated to establish power and legitimize political ideologies. This means that the history we are taught can be shaped to reinforce the status quo and political agendas, excluding alternative perspectives or dissenting voices.
3. Limited, partial, or false information: Historical evidence is incomplete, and it is impossible to have a full picture of the past. Furthermore, historical documents could be falsified, destroyed, or purposely ignored, resulting in a limited or false representation of the past.
4. Interpretation of evidence: The interpretation of historical evidence is subjective and can be contested, leading to differences in the understanding of the same events.
AI concludes that, there are valid reasons for doubting world history as taught in schools and universities. Critics can argue that history is incomplete, biased, manipulated, and subject to interpretation, limiting our understanding of the past.
Long before AI, a group of mathematicians headed by Anatoly T. Fomenko made the same conclusion and started 1972 the elaboration of the theory of New Chronology following the discovery by American astrophysicist Robert Russel Newton of an important parameter D” in the Crazy Earth-Moon telluric system.
The remedy is the Theory of New Chronology: The problem with history being erroneous even on an academic level is that it is built in the XVI-XVII centuries on the popery chronology foundations laid by Scaliger and Petavious. The theory of the New Chronology has two parts: scientific and entertainment.
The first one proves irrefutably, on the basis of statistics, astronomy, and physics, that the chronology of world history is erroneous; btw, my books are banned by the Russian Orthodox church.
The second part lets readers sample chunks of the reconstruction of history (not irrefutable) as a way to relax from the difficulty of digesting the tables and charts, and to understand new methods derived from statistics and mathematics.
In my books, History is an Art of fiction; therefore, historians are not scientists but artists at the pay and agenda of powers. If the powers changed they rewrote history diligently to their taste.
To reconstruct world history, you need 100 scientists in exact science branches to check the authenticity and irrefutability of primary sources, and 10,000 historians working through mountains of documents who will not be ruled by pay or the agenda of the past and today’s powers.
At present, we have a new current of history buffs who accuse historians of silencing facts that prove that the civilization homo sapience originates from alien sapiences who morphed into homo sapiences. Too bad, the Anunnaki didn’t teach us not to lie. Moreover, the number of allegedly inexplicable Anunaki artifacts is growing daily. Check the new chronology with Chronoviser from the Vatican. Better yet, everybody is overwhelmed by intergalactic visitors to our Solar System: AI-guided scout 3I/ATLAS and Fortress SWNR2.